-X-
Medium-sized Lebowski
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
Yep. The great equalizer. But let's say, I don't know, 3 other players come out and say that the atmosphere at Rams Park was stifling or paranoid. What does it matter? Are we (or you) suggesting that it was those *things* that led to the demise of Spagnuolo/Devaney? If so, you pretty much have to discount every other variable. Or, at a minimum, assign a pretty high percentage of blame to his management skills (with players or otherwise). I dunno. Just doesn't seem like this is a productive conversation. We're now holstering Karney's comments in the hopes that someone else says something similar. To what end?squeaky wheel said:X said:Well, maybe they are - maybe they aren't. Like you said, it depends on circumstance. That said, has there been even one other player that has chastised Spagnuolo even remotely to the extent that Karney has? One? I think that's the crux of the issue here. We saw *several* players openly mock, decry, defy, and even flat out state that Linehan was out of touch with the team. I think that's the main point here.squeaky wheel said:X said:You're missing the point, Squeak. There are very real differences between what happened under Linehan, and what happened under Spagnuolo. Regarding your other posts, I think you're getting too hung up on semantics here. But that's just my observation.squeaky wheel said:Admit it....you've been caught doing your old schtick again and no amount of your posting pages per post of obfuscation will change the fact that you claimed "TEAM" yet can't provide more than two players.
Well those posts are now a heck of a lot of scrolling away....but at issue is his contention that players that speak out negatively in the press towards a coach are not ostracized. That's pure fantasy IMO. The example he gives is only 2 players, both the highest paid vets at that time and both out of reach of the coach.
Uh.... I think.
And as I've said earlier.....time will tell.
Meh. I'm more invested in analyzing what Fisher/Snead are planning to do, and following how THAT unfolds. Kind of the same thing I did with Spagnuolo/Devaney. They were going to install a system and team concept centered on the four pillars. Maybe if everything went according to plan, it would have been a success. We'll just never know. Now we're doing a 180 with these two new guys. They're going to put everyone on notice and dress everyone down in the hopes of fielding the most competitive and qualified group of guys. Obviously that's going to mean going away from the previous philosophy to an extent. Should be interesting to see how that works out. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. Just curious as to how it works out. And, of course, I'm behind it 100%.