Le'Veon Bell's holdout

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,836
.

http://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/...rade-rumors-update/1p34lelttymuo10kurrcc8c20i

Le'Veon Bell's holdout has reached point of career-damaging consequences
NFL
  • Jeff DiamondContributor @jeffdiamondNFL[/paste:font]


    Published on Sep. 21, 2018


    Le'Veon Bell's holdout from the Steelers, an illogical, costly and self-induced absence that's a major misjudgment of potential market value by the player and his agent, is one of the most ludicrous in NFL history.

    I saw a lot of holdouts during my NFL contract negotiating days and was a party to many. But the Pittsburgh running back, whose holdout dragged on through the preseason and is now into the third week of the regular season, has done major damage to his career just in the past two weeks.


    MORE: Explaining Le'Veon Bell's holdout

    For whatever reason — supposedly an unsatisfactory amount of guaranteed money — Bell in the offseason turned down a reported five-year, $70 million deal (with $33 million guaranteed) that would have made him the NFL's highest-paid back. After the July 15 deadline for franchise-tagged players to sign long-term deals passed, Bell's only option for this season became the one-year, $14.5 million franchise tender.

    I predicted in July that Bell would report to the team the week before the season opener, and that "no player is going to give up $853,000 per week."

    Wrong and wrong.

    I misjudged the ill-advised intentions of Bell and his agent, Adisa Bakari, who has been making inflammatory statements that Bell might wait until Week 11 to report in order to limit his exposure to injury prior to free agency and, in the process, forego $8.53 million.

    Bell and Bakari are living in a fantasy land if they believe the 26-year-old will make up that money in his next contract.

    MORE: NFL's highest-paid players

    Both the statements from the agent and Bell's absence into the regular season say several things to NFL team owners, general managers and coaches. As a former GM and team president, I first would consider the brain cramp that is Bell giving up so much money each week.

    Then I'd think about the lack of commitment. As Bell frolics in Miami Beach on jet skis and in album-recording sessions, his Steelers teammates are struggling through an 0-1-1 start highlighted by diva wide receiver Antonio Brown's truancy.

    Replacement running back James Conner produced Bell-like numbers in Week 1 against the Browns, but he was much less effective in last week’s loss to the Chiefs, in part because the Steelers fell behind 21-0 before Ben Roethlisberger rallied the team by air. Pittsburgh would love to have Bell and Conner as a one-two punch, but that’s not happening right now.

    Another problem: For a sixth-year player who has missed 14 games in his career due to injury (not to mention missed games for off-field issues), Bell’s questionable durability was already on the minds of GMs. Bell’s camp only amplifies the injury factor when it talks about his staying out of harm's way with a late-season return.

    Finally, I think it’s fair to ask the question: How much does this guy love the game?

    leveon-bell-071718-getty-ftrjpg_ycns0mfgq9hn11txmo74nn1vi.jpg


    The biggest mistake Bell and his agent are making is not realizing his best offer as a free agent in March likely would have come from the Steelers. But it appears too much damage has been done, and Bakari's July statement that 2018 is likely Bell's last year in Pittsburgh almost certainly will come to fruition.

    Given what has transpired this year, especially over the last two weeks, it's unlikely that Steelers owner Art Rooney and GM Kevin Colbert will franchise Bell again next year at $17.4 million. They instead are likely to let the RB depart via free agency in return for a third-round compensatory pick.

    That might be what Bell wants — a fresh start with a new team. He also wants to top Todd Gurley's new deal with the Rams, a reported four-year contract at $14.375 million per year with $45 million guaranteed.

    But I see Bell's market value dropping by the minute. He might have already devalued himself to the point where he could wind up with a one-year, "prove it" deal as his best option in the spring.

    Bell's absence in the days before the Steelers’ first game ignited a firestorm in the locker room, where offensive linemen Ramon Foster and Maurkice Pouncey ripped the three-time Pro Bowler. Foster said Bell "doesn't give a damn" about the team or his teammates. Added Pouncey: "Honestly it's a little selfish, I'm kinda pissed right now and it sucks that he's not here."

    It's extremely rare to hear players make those types of statements about a teammate. How awkward will it be when and if Bell walks into the Steelers' South Side facility at some point this fall?

    If Bell does report Nov. 13 — that’s the NFL deadline for franchise-tagged players to sign their tender and play in 2018 — keep in mind what he tweeted July 16: "To all my Steeler fans, trust me, 2018 will be my best season to date." He’ll need to average 317 yards per game (rushing and receiving) over the last seven games in order to top his 2,215 combined yards in 2014.

    Good luck with that.
    .
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
10,286
Why is this a dumb article? Makes a lot of sense to me. Bell badly misplaced his hand on this as far as I can see....
 

bubbaramfan

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
7,143
Kurt, you say this article is the dumbest ever written, but don't tell us why you think that.

I don't wholly agree with the article, but most of it has valid points.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,328
Name
Dennis
Well, the only thing going for Bell is the Steelers are 0-1-1 and hopefully on their way to 0-2-1 and then I believe something will happen with Bell, IMHO.
 

tempests

Hall of Fame
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
3,002
Can I say I'm grateful the Rams aren't dealing with this. Not too many times in the past, the Rams FO could be considered more forward thinking than the Steelers but in this case it's true. They saw this coming with Gurley and got out ahead of it, recognizing the RB market was about to be corrected, and became the league trend setters themselves. For the holdout they were dealing with, they did (and spent) whatever it took to make sure the Aaron Donald situation didn't bleed into the season.

Pittsburgh is rigidly sticking to the way they've structured contracts in the past, and they look like the stick in the mud franchise on this one. Bell is not interested in being the RB with the heaviest workload again without a long term commitment and the guaranteed money to match. He made clear his distaste for the franchise tag this past offseason, going so far to say he'd consider retiring before playing out another year on it. The Steelers didn't take him seriously.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,858
Well, the only thing going for Bell is the Steelers are 0-1-1 and hopefully on their way to 0-2-1 and then I believe something will happen with Bell, IMHO.

Are you thinking trade? They can't give him more money or a new contract.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,836
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Kurt, you say this article is the dumbest ever written, but don't tell us why you think that.

I don't wholly agree with the article, but most of it has valid points.

His belief that bell has ruined his career is preposterous. Bell will make exactly the same money in free agency that Gurley made this season. Maybe even more. To think otherwise is living in denial of reality.

Then to suggest he would have to take a prove it deal is laughable. Teams will be clamouring to sign him up.

This guy is just clutching at straws to fill out the article. The last paragraph is embarrassing.

.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,836
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
Are you thinking trade? They can't give him more money or a new contract.

They can't trade him either until he signs the franchise tag.

.
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,710
Well, the only thing going for Bell is the Steelers are 0-1-1 and hopefully on their way to 0-2-1 and then I believe something will happen with Bell, IMHO.
They aren't 0-1-1 because Bell isn't there.....unless he can play DB or replace the D.C....they know it and I would think he does as well.
His replacement is tearing it up.
Truth is Tomlin should have probably been replaced a couple of years ago. His team continually under perform.
If Bell is cut during a hold out does he still get paid by the Steelers?
 

RamsSince1969

Ram It, Do You Know How To Ram It, Ram It
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
3,745
More delicious tears as the tables have turned. Rams are doing everything right, Steelers going backwards.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,328
Name
Dennis
Are you thinking trade? They can't give him more money or a new contract.

Not sure Trade, although that might be good for all parties, but maybe the Steelers just admitting they can't win without him. Again, I liked nothing better then to see the Steelers win about 3 games this year and start a rebuild that takes them 30 years.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,328
Name
Dennis
They aren't 0-1-1 because Bell isn't there.....unless he can play DB or replace the D.C....they know it and I would think he does as well.
His replacement is tearing it up.

Agree that defensively the Steelers are in trouble, however, Connor only rushed for 17 yards against the Chiefs and granted they were behind, but that's not exactly tearing it up. Connor is not bell, Connor is a good running back, Bell is an elite running back....Eric Dickerson vs. Charles White or Greg Bell.
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,710
Agree that defensively the Steelers are in trouble, however, Connor only rushed for 17 yards against the Chiefs and granted they were behind, but that's not exactly tearing it up. Connor is not bell, Connor is a good running back, Bell is an elite running back....Eric Dickerson vs. Charles White or Greg Bell.
I know.
But he had about 150 total yards vs the Browns.
Bell could take a run to the endzone that Connor my gain 12 yards on.
Bell is unique and explosive player. But he's not a QB. For a team with issues Bell is t worth the head ache.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,858
For whatever reason — supposedly an unsatisfactory amount of guaranteed money — Bell in the offseason turned down a reported five-year, $70 million deal (with $33 million guaranteed) that would have made him the NFL's highest-paid back. After the July 15 deadline for franchise-tagged players to sign long-term deals passed, Bell's only option for this season became the one-year, $14.5 million franchise tender.

The guaranteed money is the important number. Seems like they were close enough to get a deal done. Why not 38 million? Maybe, the Steelers should have traded him if they didn't want to risk the money because of his injury history and/or they know their window to win is closing fast.

I misjudged the ill-advised intentions of Bell and his agent, Adisa Bakari, who has been making inflammatory statements that Bell might wait until Week 11 to report in order to limit his exposure to injury prior to free agency and, in the process, forego $8.53 million.

At this point Bell is losing money but, not taking a beating and not getting injured. Seems like a lose situation for both sides. He will be 27 in Feb. I guess next year a team could give him what amounts to a three year deal @45 Million with 40 Million guaranteed.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
For whatever reason — supposedly an unsatisfactory amount of guaranteed money — Bell in the offseason turned down a reported five-year, $70 million deal (with $33 million guaranteed) that would have made him the NFL's highest-paid back.

It was his decision, with advice from his agent, to do that. And it was a mistake. His agent said in an interview that he is a "once in a generation" and the Steelers responded with a statement that said they won't discuss it through the media and that his agent has their phone number. He's also said that this year will likely be his last as a Steeler. So you have an agent with an inflated sense of his client threatening the team.

That's not good.

He has an injury history and two strikes on the substance abuse policy. And he has a 14.5MIL payday for the season. Fully guaranteed.

One thing life has taught me. Never play a game of chicken you cannot win, and that is precisely what he and his agent are doing. If he sits until November's date where he has to sign to get the accrued year and the franchise money for remaining games he is going to give teams a real reason to think about passing on him.

He also wants to top Todd Gurley's new deal with the Rams, a reported four-year contract at $14.375 million per year with $45 million guaranteed.

If in fact this is true and he said it I'm letting him go and taking the 3rd rounder because he isn't interested in negotiating anymore. He wants to dictate the terms to the team and that's an untenable position for them.
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
18,385
Name
Haole
They need to trade him for a High School level defense. That would be a big improvement over what they are trotting out on the field right now.

LOLZ


Fuck the Kneelers.
 

RamInferno

UDFA
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
72
I think the article is spot on. If Bell tries to come back week 11, I predict the Steelers making him inactive and telling him to stay home. Why let your team be used as a showcase for his contract with his next team? Then see what kind of contract he gets after not playing an entire year and age 27.
 

Rams43

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
4,251
I think the article makes several valid points.

If I’m a GM, I have to think twice before acquiring a 27 year old self centered twice drug involved RB that is a locker room negative and foolishly demands an arm and a leg in salary compensation.
 

hotanez

NRA Member for Life
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
7,717
one of the best RB in the league, definitely top 3 if not the best will get paid extremely well in free agency. Look at this past free agency, Unproven players like Watkins still got paid. Steelers made a big mistake by not getting a deal done or trading him.They got greedy
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
18,000
This article doesn't exist if the Steelers won at least one game.

But they didn't. So media gonna drama.