- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,931
Agreed on JL. He looks like he is in slow motion out there . I like both of them , but it's time to move onIt's an easy decision for me to cut Chris Long at this point. He has no burst off the ball anymore IMO. I'd shock some and cut JL55 too. He's a liability in the middle of the field on passing plays and his run D is average to poor IMO. I'd give Hager a look in the middle as soon as he could make the calls and shifts.
It's an easy decision for me to cut Chris Long at this point. He has no burst off the ball anymore IMO. I'd shock some and cut JL55 too. He's a liability in the middle of the field on passing plays and his run D is average to poor IMO. I'd give Hager a look in the middle as soon as he could make the calls and shifts.
It's an easy decision for me to cut Chris Long at this point. He has no burst off the ball anymore IMO. I'd shock some and cut JL55 too. He's a liability in the middle of the field on passing plays and his run D is average to poor IMO. I'd give Hager a look in the middle as soon as he could make the calls and shifts.
I agree and when it happens I'm looking for the next can't miss 10 plug and play stud not a nice ST player with a little upside.You can't cut both guys in one off-season. You're losing too much leadership and there's no proof that Hager can do the job. I'm all for finding Laurinaitis's heir this off-season but he needs to be here for at least one more season.
You can't cut both guys in one off-season. You're losing too much leadership and there's no proof that Hager can do the job. I'm all for finding Laurinaitis's heir this off-season but he needs to be here for at least one more season.
Wow. So Gurley and Tavon do nothing for you? What about the fact that they have used more draft and FA capital on the offense than the defense?
#2 overall pick last year, trading up to 8 for TA, Gurley this year not to mention practically every other pick in this last draft went offense...
You don't have to like all the moves they have made, but it hasn't been an issue of "ignoring the offense".
It's an issue of coaching them.
Give me a good OC, get a new Oline coach because Paul Beaudreau hasn't been very good (cmon, he has been given a pass for too long) and get rid of Sherman for a better WR coach... just an all new offensive staff...
Yes, I want change, but not just extreme change just for the sake of it.
Fisher and Snead have given us Brockers, Ogletree, Austin, Donald and Gurley.
Whose picks over the last 4 years you would swap those guys for?
Remember what our drafts looked like before these guys got here (sure, we got Quinn on the slide.... but other than that???)
Where was all that offensive talent before they got here?
Like it or not, Snead/Fisher have provided us with the best offensive players since Vermeil left in 2000.
RE: Chris Long.
1. I don't think his replacement is under contract for 2016.
2. I don't think he is worth keeping at his current contract amount (salary $9.75 mil, roster bonus $2 mil, total cap hit of $14.25 mil).
3. Chris Long still has value as a player, probably more to us than most other teams.
4. Currently, the only DEs we have under contract for 2016 are Quinn and Long. Longacre is an ERFA.
5. Good starting DEs in FA command large salaries.
Therefore, I suggest our best course is to resign Long to a reasonable contract, resign Hayes, and draft a developmental/rotational DE in the mid rounds who you expect to be ready to start in 2017.
Hayes who was paid 4.5 million to be the back up to Chris Long this season is sure to want a nice pay increase since he has carried the starting load the last two seasons for Long. Are you suggesting that Hayes will sign for less ??? Hayes was already very well paid as a back up DE.