Picked4td
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2015
- Messages
- 1,568
Interesting, not sure how he'd fit here. Only off the top of my head thing I can think of that'd work is if we traded Barron to someone and signed Bowman to replace. But Mark Barron's dead money from releasing or trading is astronomical at $20 million last time I looked so that doesn't work. And I don't think Bowman would be a fit at olb'er. Sooooo, don't think signing him would work for us since Barron and Ogeltree's deals have pretty much handcuffed us to them for the foreseeable future.
I believe its closer to 15m dead money but 9m is for this year which is a roster bonus so its already paid. so either way that money is already accounted for and on the cap. so if they viewed bowman as a barron replacement, salary cap wise it would be like bowman is getting paid barrons money (obviously + whatever bowman signs for).
point being the dead money isnt as bad as it seems cuz its already accounted for and wouldnt hinder the team/cap situation any further this year, just the additional dead money that would be accounted for next year, which would happen if they were to move on from him at the end of the year anyway