OFFICIAL LA Rams 2025 Cut Thread

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
6,762
I am not sure where the regression narrative is coming from. He is still the back up C and probably the next in line to take over the position.
One guy reads into the fact that he is playing Guard and they have someone else at C and instead of assuming they are cross training and evaluating others, they jump to he is regressing. There is nothing that points to regression other than people on this board stating it as fact.
He didn't grade out as well in preseason games is where most folks tend to get it from. We shall see, maybe they like Limmer as the center down the road? Be nice to have him and Lampkin (practice squad st least) there as I don't see Shelton being here long.
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
7,259
Name
Jeff
Lampkin could be back. If he ends up on the Eagle's practice squad, and the Rams have a need down the road, they could poach Lampkin back.

Am I right on this?
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,839
Lampkin could be back. If he ends up on the Eagle's practice squad, and the Rams have a need down the road, they could poach Lampkin back.

Am I right on this?
They claimed him on waivers so he is on their 53 man. They would have to waive him in order to put him on their PS.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
7,954
Remember how many posters on here told us that we're crazy to think that anybody is going to claim our cuts?
And I don't think it's over yet. :)
well, not crazy but did not see this many claimed from our cuts, it speaks well for us and I was definitely wrong!
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
7,259
Name
Jeff
They claimed him on waivers so he is on their 53 man. They would have to waive him in order to put him on their PS.
Oh yeah...right.

All hope is lost then.

Dang it!
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,893
It’s always interesting how different ones decide who deserve to make the top 53 before the preseason even starts, and never change their mind.
Whereas the Coaches of said teams wait and see who shows they deserve to be on the team.
Then these coaches are viewed as idiots for not choosing somebody who didn’t earn a spot on the team.
Well, YouTube study everything I need to know! (Call me Sean)
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,839
But doesn’t that only apply if they poached him from our PS?
Philly claimed him on waivers, he's on their 53 man roster. He needed to clear waivers before the Rams (or any other team) could put him on a PS.
Conversely, if Philly wants to put him on their PS, they have to waive him, wait for waiver to clear and then he can go on PS (or any other team)
 

Alaskan Ram

Last Frontier Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
1,251
But I thought teams would be concentrating on their own guys and we shouldn’t worry about cut players making it to the PS. :eyeroll:
1) First risk was cut players not clearing waivers and going straight to a team's 53 Active Roster. (4 players in our case - highest in league)

2) Next risk was our cut players clearing waivers and choosing another team's practice squad over ours, if we offered.

3) Final risk is players accepting offer to our PS that can be poached to the new teams 53.