I've never been one to get overly committed one way or another about who they select, especially when it comes to tempering my own expectations, as through the years I've often been surprised. Like in the case of Donald, I was kind of surprised that they did pick him, and not in a negative way.
I was disappointed the Robinson pick, but I just figured that thew knew what they were doing. That said, I would have rather seen them spending a pick on the offensive line once a year to keep the overall level of competition high, as our current management team does, rather than being forced to reach on a pick in the first round that could turn out to be disastrous.
I was super nervous about a Fisher led team selecting a quarterback without having the offensive line or receiver problem solved, but I wouldn't have expected any coach to turn that all around in one year as McVay did, so what do I know? Then again, are we proving that McVay's philosophy is unsustainable?
I know that every management team is going to have their own philosophy, like picking offensive tackles later as an effort at efficiency with the idea that those who don't work out well can play at guard, but obviously you have to diversify that effect enough that you don't see someone like Noteboom struggle at the guard position.
In the end, I just try to enjoy the players they pick or sign, and no longer vex myself with apparent contradictions between player acquisition and system fit, or system/coach changes that turn personnel decisions upside down for that matter