Allen2McVay
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2020
- Messages
- 8,803
- Name
- Jim
Ummm ...I think that's a fair assumption. I'd put my guess at 65/45.
Ummm ...I think that's a fair assumption. I'd put my guess at 65/45.
Hahaha... I actually had it written right the first time... but I'll keep it, the 45 signifies my past wrong assumptions on JJ coming back!Ummm ...
It might be they just don't have any one who has the ability to make the calls right now. JJ might just keep the confusion facter down. Which will help them play faster.I love John Johnson but my concern is that the Rams may not have liked the guys they have in camp. I thought Quentin Lake and Russ Yeast were playing well and Fuller was almost assured to start. Perhaps not. Or maybe it was the depth behind those guys. All we know for sure is that Johnson will be starting.
Yeah I will agree that the other ILB role will end up being a safety and he'll get a ton of snaps. But one problem there is we don't really have a top SS type. Ironically enough Scott would have been excellent in that usage but the guys we have now I don't think are particularly good tacklers. Which is to say I'm sure they can tackle but the box safety type are generally guys who thrive on that shit.Rams base Defense will no doubt feature 3 safeties. 5 man front, Jones as the lone ILB, then one of the 3 Safeties playing in like a LB role. So basically top 3 Safeties are starters.
Yep, that would be interesting. I just remember when JJ left thinking that the Browns got themselves an excellent safety and now the Rams would have to try to fill a hole with, hopefully, a player of equal abilities.Will say though that I'd love to hear JJ speak on his usage with the Browns, because he was ascending as a player when he left us.