- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 3,817
- Name
- Eddy
For me it's Lawrence or bust at 31 and NT or DL. He is the piece that fits us perfectly. If he's gone, there are plenty of other options to include guys like Saunders and Wren plus some others later.
But yeah IMO Lawrence would be an impact addition. Him next to AD would be terrifying for opposing defenses from day one of preseason on. Most lines would struggle badly with those two next to each other.
And hope he doesnt end up like Dominic Easly.While it’s easy to make the argument that we should focus on immediate contributors, you have to remember good teams plan with the long term prospects in mind. Simmons when healthy is a top 5-10 pick in this draft. Imagine getting that value and steal potential at #31! Now imagine him fully healthy next year alongside AD- NASTY! I think we have the depth on the line bw returning starters and last year’s draft class to really fortify the DL. Maybe add a vet or undrafted rookie to the mix while we let Simmons heal, then release the demon next year after Brock walks.
I’ll take Simmons all day long and twice next Thursday!
I think Simmons is a better fit than Lawrence. He even played NT in a Phillips 3-4 variant in 2017.
And hope he doesnt end up like Dominic Easly.
Concerns over the severity of the knee injury could be a show stopper but waiting until he is ready should be low to no concern. Pretty sure if the Rams have Simmons graded significantly higher than Tillery - Simmons would be their choice. This is a 5 year commitment if it works out.Yep. But I want a starter day one in our push for home field in the NFC. Waiting on him plus a knee prob on the interior meh.
It's worth nothing that PFF grades on a play by play basis despite who you play against . I know nothing about Notre Dame and their competition though .Interesting that PFF has him rated number 7 overall
Finding a player that will take pressure off of Donald & stuff the middle of the D”Line could be priceless & not worth playing games.
I always like trading down, but not worth missing an elite prospect for.
For me, the real problem with not taking Simmons at #31 as opposed to a small trade down for an extra pick & Simmons, is about losing the 5'th year option on him. On a trade down, and with his lack of participation during the 2019 season due to the ACL injury, we are only guaranteed 3 more years out of him. With him at #31, we can extend his stay at least for 1 more year at a fairly reasonable salary, and with Donald in the line-up at top dollar, the Rams need all the financial breaks they can find for the guy playing next to him. jmo.
Writer's "truthfully not sure," then quotes Jeremiah on precisely why there's a distinct lack of hype. Too funny.
So why the distinct lack of hype? Truthfully, I’m not sure. The NFL Network’s Daniel Jeremiah notes that ‘he is a very streaky player on tape…he just needs to become more consistent’ as his biggest knock. Lance Zierlein notes that Tillery is ‘raw with his hands and hasn’t learned to properly weaponize them in his rush attack.’ Reading those criticisms only makes me like Tillery more. If Tillery truly is inconsistent and raw yet still produced at the highest level we’ve seen from a college interior defender, just think what he could become if coaches can fix those issues at the NFL level.
He’s not my ideal pick but if McVay and Wade want him who am I to argue?
Concerns over the severity of the knee injury could be a show stopper but waiting until he is ready should be low to no concern. Pretty sure if the Rams have Simmons graded significantly higher than Tillery - Simmons would be their choice. This is a 5 year commitment if it works out.
How dominate will Simmons be ? If injury is a concern? Why not draft a CB . I look at franchise tag as a value. The Rams paying Joyner vs Tru was a big difference in cap space.