- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 34,101
- Name
- Stu
And if my employees were being impetuous jerks on Twitter, I would likely lose customers. I would also not think too highly of how my employee holds my business (the team) and its success. The idea that it doesn't matter or shouldn't matter to the coach or team is frankly not based in any kind of business reality.That's my point. Customers always "pay for" the checks. Whether it's Publix, the Rams, or your restaurant. If nobody is buying, there's no business.
But that doesn't grant the customer/fans any powers or rights. It doesn't make you or Jenkins accountable to them.(a good business is going to want to make their customers happy but there's nothing forcing them to)
That is a red herring and no one has suggested it does excepting the fans' power to voice their opinion. The very fact that a good business is going to want to make their customers happy is part and parcel to this whole discussion. If a player is conducting himself contrary to the desired image of the team, or in a manner detrimental to the brand, it is counter productive to the ability of the team to do so. Are JJ's tweets all important toward that end? Of course not.
The fans have everything at stake in this arrangement. It is their fandom that the team is after and what makes the team money. If players ebb away at that fandom, it can hurt the team financially. The team doesn't have to agree with fans on particular points but the team is going to want its fans 100% in its corner as much as they possibly can. Going public with essentially calling the team cheap is detrimental to that end.And yes, the fans have nothing at stake in this arrangement. The money will come from the Rams. If the fans aren't happy with the deal, they can choose not to spend their money supporting the Rams.
They almost without a doubt would lose their job as demonstrated by Yelp the other day. It was almost identical to what JJ is pulling here. They fired her and rightfully so for conduct detrimental to the image of their company. Personally, I think Yelp is run by a bunch of sleaze ball extortionists but they were right in this case.As for whether or not a cashier would lose his job, I have no idea. I don't know if Publix would fire an employee for complaining about his wages on twitter.
And I'm still not talking about Jenks mailing it in. Not sure where you got that. I'm talking about how often players will be on their best behavior while playing on the cheap and hoping for that big payday only to either not be worthy of it after the ink dries or feel they are finally able to do what they always wanted cuz now they got the bank roll.As for your last point, we weren't talking about Jenkins mailing it in. We were talking about Jenkins's twitter habits. As Les pointed out, Jenkins has always been vocal on twitter. This isn't new. Every team that wants him is aware of it (including the Rams).
I realize JJ on Twitter is nothing new. You honestly think his twitter history has helped him in the eyes of the NFL check writers? I highly doubt it and this latest crap will only further that distaste. Coaches, GMs, and owners all want talented players. But let's not kid ourselves that they wouldn't pay more for or be more desirous of talent that came with good character. Otherwise players like JJ don't fall to us in the second round. Everyone knew his talent was 1st round worthy. It was his pea brain antics that dropped him. Why do you think his pay or other team's desire to have him join them would be affected any differently? Because he was a semi good boy for 4 years that only got suspended once and is a twitter nightmare? Yeah - I'm sure things like this make coaches and GMs sleep well at night.