- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 6,291
- Name
- Tim
They certainly did not lose because of him and that is saying a lot considering the decadeDid they win because of Keenum?
They certainly did not lose because of him and that is saying a lot considering the decadeDid they win because of Keenum?
You mean like on the practice field and class room where the coaches see them every day?And that's what I cant comprehend.
If Keenum outplayed him on a level playing field, I'd understand.
If Keenum was a solid pro, I'd understand
If Goff was drafted in the 2nd round, I'd understand
With Keenum playing with the 1's? Yeah, I ready said that's part of the problem...You mean like on the practice field and class room where the coaches see them every day?
They also beat Seattle and Arizona with Nick Foles at QB, guess we shoulda kept him?They certainly did not lose because of him and that is saying a lot considering the decade
The camp reports we have been saying say that all three of the QBs have been getting time with the 1s. Thinking that fans have a better idea of what is happening at Rams is ridiculous.With Keenum playing with the 1's? Yeah, I ready said that's part of the problem...
They also beat Seattle and Arizona with Nick Foles at QB, guess we shoulda kept him?
The old "coaches know more than us" conversation stopper.The camp reports we have been seeing say that all three of the QBs have been getting time with the 1s. Thinking that fans have a better idea of what is happening at Rams is ridiculous.
Works every timeThe old "coaches know more than us" conversation stopper.
The only people who give a rats ass about the stats are FF players. Bottom line, a WAnd Gurley of course, 90 total yards and a td, 50+ rushing in the 4th Q alone while Keenum was only able to compleye 3 of 6 for 10 total yards...
And that same Keenum promptly went out and lost to a San Fran team that had lost its last 3 games and 5 of its previous 6...So your answer is incorrect. The Rams did win in Seattle with Keenum playing QB and that was the first time since 2004.
Really? Did you watch that game? Gurley was the only offense because Keenum couldn't do a thingThe only people who give a rats ass about the stats are FF players. Bottom line, a W
Without Gurley and a bad kick by ZuerlinAnd that same Keenum promptly went out and lost to a San Fran team that had lost its last 3 games and 5 of its previous 6...
We can certainly discuss everything. W's matter more than stats, coaches know a hell of lot more than fans are just facts. No one cares that a QB with bad stats won the SB last year do they?Really? Did you watch that game? Gurley was the only offense because Keenum couldn't do a thing
So now we cant speculate because you pulled the coaches know everything" card and are following it up with "stats don't matter"
What's safe to talk about?
And only 16 points against a defense giving up almost 27 a game during their losing streakWithout Gurley and a bad kick by Zuerlin
Bad stats for his career? I don't think I need to look it up that Peyton Manning might just have a little edge on CK thereWe can certainly discuss everything. W's matter more than stats, coaches know a hell of lot more than fans are just facts. No one cares that a QB with bad stats won the SB last year do they?