I just watched the game again, and Goff did better than he gets credit for. Yes, he missed some receivers, but he did some good things too, but our receivers did not come through.
He made a perfect pass on 3rd and 10 with 8 mins left in the 2nd Q. If 83 Reynolds could have held on to this pass he made under pressure, then we would have had a 1st down on the 15 yard line.
In this next image below, you'll see the Cooks was very close to the first down when he caught the ball (another nice play by Goff),
but the refs gave us a bad spot. The ball is in his hand in this blurry image, which shows his forward progress.
It should have been 3rd and inches, but they made it 3rd and 2 and we didn't make it and had to punt.
In this next image you can see where they spotted the ball. I'm surprised McVay did not challenge the spot.
Next was a sack that could have been roughing the passer.
Pats' 54 picks up Goff's legs (see his left arm) and drills Goff into the ground. Goff took a beating, but he stayed in the pocket to make some good passes for much of the game.
In the next image you'll see a helmet/face mask tackle on Cooks that was not called. Why do the Pats consistently get treated differently than other teams? If you look at historical penalty data, they are not treated the same.
Next, you'll see Cooks' WTF reaction by the no-call, but ref just ignores him.
Then, we all know Goff made a great TD pass, but
#24, Gilmore again (same guy who face-masked Cooks earlier), holds Cook's arm. This pass would have tied the game.
So, Goff made some good passes to change the game, but our receivers did not come through. There was PI before Reynolds' miss, but he still got both hands on it. There was PI on Cooks TD pass too, but the point is, Goff made 2 great passes here. Either would have changed the game if caught or if the refs called the PI. Goff did his part in this game.
He still has a lot to learn and he'll do better as he gains experience, but he did pretty good for the youngest QB to play a Super Bowl.