I voted no but there is obvious bias that comes in to play in games every week.
So much frustration in this thread! Even the folks who voted "not fixed", it was with the caveat that somehow systematic personal bias is somehow ok. Imho, it is not ok.
I voted "yes, it is fixed". In the best case, the NFL is either ignoring or not publicly addressing an obvious issue of systematic personal bias and miserable inconsistency in how games are called. In the worst case, the NFL (does the N stand for Nefarious?) is behind these biases in an effort to either keep games competitive (entertaining), or to favor certain large market teams.
Have always thought so since Super Bowl XXXVI
After our Super Bowl against the patsies.
The league commissioner destroying evidence so it could never be seen by others.
It kinda goes without saying that the GSOT years were horrible years financially for the league.
ne - one - blown call should be a mandatory reassignment to the classroom for further scrutiny and education.
The lack of public accountability for refs is at the heart of the problem. The NFL wants to present the image of a fair and even playing field, perfectly officiated games. But they have ref meetings after every game where they review every play and every call / non-call. If only they would own up to their own imperfection, that would go a long way. If they (or some other 3rd party) could roll up those bad calls / missed calls into some statistical model, then at least we'd be able to comment on whether or not there was a systematic problem or not.
Basically, as long as games are close, the officials can sway the outcome. I don't think they do it every game, but I think they do it some games, and it's not beyond them to do it in a Super Bowl or the playoffs. I'm convinced we've actually seen it.
It would be interesting to study these games and see how many penalties were called once one team got way ahead, especially since the Goodell era began.
I tend to think of this as more of the refs covering their butts by trying to even out the penalties so there is not an obvious bias. I'm reminded of the New England / Rams game in London.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201210280ram.htm
Go through the play by play, it's not just the number of penalties called, but the critical nature of the penalties called and the subjectivity. They called all kinds of 3rd and X penalties on the Rams where they got the Pats off the field... except for the penalty called. They just kept calling penalties against the Rams until the game was out of reach. Then they called a few meaningless penalties against the Pats. Offsides on a kickoff. In the end, the penalties weren't even close, either in number called or in yards allowed. 8-42 for the Pats, 12-102 for the Rams, but that doesn't come close to capturing how badly the refs favored the Pats.
The Rams seem to seriously suffer in terms of penalties called that put the other team ahead, get big plays called back, extend drives for the other teams, kill drives for the Rams... and strongly disfavoring the Rams while they still have a chance in the game.
In the Dallas game, as a comparison point, the Rams kept themselves in the game despite all the favoritism the refs were showing to Dallas. The refs just didn't have a chance to even out the calls. Just crazy all the bias in that game.
The "tuck rule" being made up on the field is proof positive that the game is fixed. It was never used before that, and only a few times afterwards, and now it went away.
Seriously. How ridiculous was that, right?!?