ReekofRams
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 3,879
- Name
- Reek
That vid is a good watch, but it misses on Cooks a bit. His route running is very good, first off. He is fast in and out of breaks, and the analyst cherry picking a vid where he had to slow considerably and then assuming that Tom Perfect didn't underthrow him, that it was the wideout's fault, is bad analysis IMO.
The out pattern he showed was more demonstrative I think. It shows how the Pats value guys who are thinking/preparing with incredible detail, and the fact that Cooks wasn't in a damn mind meld with Brady means they didn't want to upset things in NE and pay him more than their future HoF tight end. But Cooks is going to get a similar next-level coaching here in LA to work on that, and hopefully he'll sign a damn contract and quit jumpin around so he can get settled in an offense and max his potential.
What you get with Cooks is a guy with elite speed and who can run the precise routes this offense requires. In that regard he is a better fit than Watkins (whose routes are good moreso than great), and while Watkins "ceiling" in this offense if he had signed might have been higher (he is a super rare athlete and strong as F both in traffic and vs the jam) I believe we'll get more production out of Cooks.
LOLI agree Champ but are you feelin ok my brother? You realize that you just ranked a slower wideout over a fast one! :eek:
Comfort in the same system, with the same O-coordinator/HC for two years in a row? lol. We should be BLOWN AWAY HAPPY about getting Cooks, and he's better than Watkins and I think works harder than Watkins....Ha!No....I didn't lay blame...I just posted an article....that was written by....IDK....it was pointing to targets....and completions....take from the numbers what you will....it just shows deep ball accuracy %%%.
We all know completions require QB, WR, lineplay...to be...in sync...cohesion...coordinated...
I get we're all HAPPY we got Cook....but we didn't utilize Watkins to his maximum...what is supposed to change? A couple extra months of camp? Cook is....smarter???? Jared is now a "sophomore"?
Just watch....the Falcons game...very good man to man corners...and safeties...and backers...that team is young like ours...pretty much the same players out there....what's gonna get a team that scored 13 points...AT HOME....better? Is it Cooks all by himself? Cause he's supposedly "better" than Sammy Watkins???? I don't think so.
Philly has Alshon Jeffery...he's targeted more than every other receiver...I'd call him a #1....Pats have Gronk (but when healthy I'd say Edelman)...he was hurt a bunch so I'd say that TB12 used Danny A (NOT Cooks) as HIS #1....Pitt has Antonio Brown...I'd guess we'd all call him a #1....Jags HAD Hurns....and Allen....not a true #1....but I'd still consider Allen a #1 type-ish player...
So 3 out of 4 teams in the AFC/NFC championships had #1 type receivers.....what's your point?
you bastid! ~Ron Jessie, Billy Waddie, and Flipper AndersonLOL
Everyone gets hung up on my lust for speed....I do love speed....put Torry's speed on Bruce!....But Bruce was special...So was Ellard...Harold Jackson. And their speed was enough.
oh boy.....Watkins isn't as hard a worker as Cooks....that's your opinion....curious how that came about but, oh well...Comfort in the same system, with the same O-coordinator/HC for two years in a row? lol. We should be BLOWN AWAY HAPPY about getting Cooks, and he's better than Watkins and I think works harder than Watkins....Ha!
Waddie had me curious....damn he'd drop a bunch of passes ...but he was OPEN!you bastid! ~Ron Jessie, Billy Waddie, and Flipper Anderson
Loved me some Ron Brown....now...that's a ST's ace! A weapon....shoulda moved his ass to RB! Didn't use him hardly enough.check out my speed, LACHAMP46! ~Ron Brown
....what's your point?
Because Cooks is known as being a gym rat, film junkie. A friend of my son’s covered OSU and UofO sports and said she had never seen anyone work harder and train more. She said that a few weeks before the trade.oh boy.....Watkins isn't as hard a worker as Cooks....that's your opinion....curious how that came about but, oh well...
Let's not forget about the tight ends. I still have faith in Higbee and Hemingway, and I think Everett is going to take the next step.
I think the number 1 receiver thing is overrated. How many teams have a true number one? And how many teams have 3 receivers in the class of Cooks, Woods and Kupp?
The point I'm making is what is a true number one? Opinions vary. Is it a guy who defenses have to account for? Rotate more guys towards his side? Double team him most plays? Sacrifice elsewhere to keep him from making the big impact?
Or is it the guy a team targets the most? A particular favorite a QB likes to go to. If suppose if thats the case then 32 teams have a number one. Woods or Kupp would probably be our number one. But are either of them considered a true number one?
This seems to be the narrative around the web...all Rams sites....Sammy loafed...Sammy dogged it....Sammy didn't finish plays...I do know it seemed like he coulda caught a couple more deep balls with more effort. And his impact was not what we hoped for.
Both....targets are said to show a QB's level of comfort with a wr....I kinda like that...Defenses game planning to take a target away....shows what the enemies think our most dangerous weapon is....Imagine Gurley. In some respects, Gurley is the weapon teams game plan against. Even his receiving game....Atl. was aggressively taking the Gurley screen and option passes away....and it killed our 3rd down offense.The point I'm making is what is a true number one? Opinions vary. Is it a guy who defenses have to account for? Rotate more guys towards his side? Double team him most plays? Sacrifice elsewhere to keep him from making the big impact?
Or is it the guy a team targets the most? A particular favorite a QB likes to go to. If suppose if thats the case then 32 teams have a number one. Woods or Kupp would probably be our number one. But are either of them considered a true number one?
Meh....Cleveland has one of the most awesome 3-somes on paper...Josh Gordon, Landry, Coleman.....on paper...It's all about utilization at this level.As for the trio... none that I can think of off the top of my head.