I suspect that Cooks is being underestimated by some...

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

ReekofRams

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
3,788
Name
Reek
Try to pick whom to double team when the Rams have the ball, and pick whom to try and block with a double team when the Rams are on defense. Oh the economic offensive and defensive coordinators, and the knee knocking of opposing quarterbacks.:seizure:
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,628
That vid is a good watch, but it misses on Cooks a bit. His route running is very good, first off. He is fast in and out of breaks, and the analyst cherry picking a vid where he had to slow considerably and then assuming that Tom Perfect didn't underthrow him, that it was the wideout's fault, is bad analysis IMO.

The out pattern he showed was more demonstrative I think. It shows how the Pats value guys who are thinking/preparing with incredible detail, and the fact that Cooks wasn't in a damn mind meld with Brady means they didn't want to upset things in NE and pay him more than their future HoF tight end. But Cooks is going to get a similar next-level coaching here in LA to work on that, and hopefully he'll sign a damn contract and quit jumpin around so he can get settled in an offense and max his potential.

What you get with Cooks is a guy with elite speed and who can run the precise routes this offense requires. In that regard he is a better fit than Watkins (whose routes are good moreso than great), and while Watkins "ceiling" in this offense if he had signed might have been higher (he is a super rare athlete and strong as F both in traffic and vs the jam) I believe we'll get more production out of Cooks.

I figured Jones picked the bad routes. I do think there is something here that shows some limitations to Cooks route running. He could be coached up some to make the transition faster. I could see McVay and Goff making a slight adjustment on the timing. I expect he will have enough cushion after going by a few DBs for TD bombs that he could slow down a tad before making the comeback.

He looks fluid with fakes on the long passes while running by defenders.
He goes over the middle a lot too.
He can jump and make catches.
I think he will help Goff in the scramble drills with his quickness to find open space.
Can do the Jet sweeps or fakes.
Good on smoke screens.

Cooks is a very exciting WR that can do so many things. In the Rams offense he will be the speed guy. Rams have Kupp and Woods as more possession guys and third down targets. It will be interesting to see how McVay uses Cooks. He will be more involved in the offense than Watkins was. I was wanting the Rams to find a speedy WR that could do what Austin does but, also be involved in the passing game. Cooks does that in spades.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,948
Name
Stu
McVay said what position he expects Cooks to play. Call it a number one if you want but it’s more of a role than a numbers game. Cooks will command doubles and take the safety with him. Proof will be in the pudding but I expect that Cooks simply makes this entire offense better. And yes - he will likely improve Goff’s game as he tends to be able to read what the defense is doing better than Watkins ever has. Add Woods’ ability to come back to the QB and it could be a very smart offense as well as talented.
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,478
And @Merlin
Bruce better than Holt (just a lil:p)....damn similar to Julio...Ellard...Jackson....

I agree Champ but are you feelin ok my brother? You realize that you just ranked a slower wideout over a fast one! :eek:
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
I agree Champ but are you feelin ok my brother? You realize that you just ranked a slower wideout over a fast one! :eek:
LOL

Everyone gets hung up on my lust for speed....I do love speed....put Torry's speed on Bruce!....But Bruce was special...So was Ellard...Harold Jackson. And their speed was enough.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,675
No....I didn't lay blame...I just posted an article....that was written by....IDK....it was pointing to targets....and completions....take from the numbers what you will....it just shows deep ball accuracy %%%.

We all know completions require QB, WR, lineplay...to be...in sync...cohesion...coordinated...

I get we're all HAPPY we got Cook....but we didn't utilize Watkins to his maximum...what is supposed to change? A couple extra months of camp? Cook is....smarter???? Jared is now a "sophomore"?

Just watch....the Falcons game...very good man to man corners...and safeties...and backers...that team is young like ours...pretty much the same players out there....what's gonna get a team that scored 13 points...AT HOME....better? Is it Cooks all by himself? Cause he's supposedly "better" than Sammy Watkins???? I don't think so.
Philly has Alshon Jeffery...he's targeted more than every other receiver...I'd call him a #1....Pats have Gronk (but when healthy I'd say Edelman)...he was hurt a bunch so I'd say that TB12 used Danny A (NOT Cooks) as HIS #1....Pitt has Antonio Brown...I'd guess we'd all call him a #1....Jags HAD Hurns....and Allen....not a true #1....but I'd still consider Allen a #1 type-ish player...
So 3 out of 4 teams in the AFC/NFC championships had #1 type receivers.....what's your point?
Comfort in the same system, with the same O-coordinator/HC for two years in a row? lol. We should be BLOWN AWAY HAPPY about getting Cooks, and he's better than Watkins and I think works harder than Watkins....Ha!
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,675
LOL

Everyone gets hung up on my lust for speed....I do love speed....put Torry's speed on Bruce!....But Bruce was special...So was Ellard...Harold Jackson. And their speed was enough.
you bastid! ~Ron Jessie, Billy Waddie, and Flipper Anderson
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,675
check out my speed, LACHAMP46! ~Ron Brown
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
Comfort in the same system, with the same O-coordinator/HC for two years in a row? lol. We should be BLOWN AWAY HAPPY about getting Cooks, and he's better than Watkins and I think works harder than Watkins....Ha!
oh boy.....Watkins isn't as hard a worker as Cooks....that's your opinion....curious how that came about but, oh well...

That system comfort works two way bro.....I still was amazed that Chip Kelly made Foles and Vick monsters...still don't know what happened the next season? Got rid of too much talent...or....did DC's adjust??? That's were I'm at....I love McVay...and his ideas...
View: http://www.therams.com/videos/videos/Burleson-McVay-is-Most-Important-Part-of-Rams-Success/4db1f250-beec-4556-9631-c622c3b5d3a3


But players ultimately win games...
you bastid! ~Ron Jessie, Billy Waddie, and Flipper Anderson
Waddie had me curious....damn he'd drop a bunch of passes ...but he was OPEN!
Flipper converted me.....if you don't have speed at wideout, you can be easily replaced.
I met Ron Jessie....dude didn't even look like a football player.
check out my speed, LACHAMP46! ~Ron Brown
Loved me some Ron Brown....now...that's a ST's ace! A weapon....shoulda moved his ass to RB! Didn't use him hardly enough.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
10,893
Name
Charlie
....what's your point?

The point I'm making is what is a true number one? Opinions vary. Is it a guy who defenses have to account for? Rotate more guys towards his side? Double team him most plays? Sacrifice elsewhere to keep him from making the big impact?

Or is it the guy a team targets the most? A particular favorite a QB likes to go to. If suppose if thats the case then 32 teams have a number one. Woods or Kupp would probably be our number one. But are either of them considered a true number one?
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,948
Name
Stu
oh boy.....Watkins isn't as hard a worker as Cooks....that's your opinion....curious how that came about but, oh well...
Because Cooks is known as being a gym rat, film junkie. A friend of my son’s covered OSU and UofO sports and said she had never seen anyone work harder and train more. She said that a few weeks before the trade.

I saw where Brees said essentially the same thing.

Have you seen anything on Watkins that says that? I haven’t but I’m also not saying it isn’t possible.

But I am going to go with Cooks being a harder worker. And watching Kupp lining Watkins up over half way through the season tells me he sure didn’t have the offense down at that point. From all accounts, the alignments and plays are not complicated in McVay’s offense. Let’s see if Cooks needs the same help.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
10,893
Name
Charlie
I don't know who's the harder worker, Cooks or Watkins. Seems like by most accounts Cooks works as hard as anyone. But thats not really the point. Watkins was never considered a slacker when it comes to working at his craft.

I do know it seemed like he coulda caught a couple more deep balls with more effort. And his impact was not what we hoped for. I'll just chalk it up to not being with the team until mid preseason. Cooks will be able to work with them from the start.
 

LARAMSinFeb.

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,449
Let's not forget about the tight ends. I still have faith in Higbee and Hemingway, and I think Everett is going to take the next step.

Yep, this is another exciting possible angle for 2018--Jordan Reed was killin it for McVay.... I think Gurley took on this role a bit last year though.
 

OnceARam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
3,372
I think the number 1 receiver thing is overrated. How many teams have a true number one? And how many teams have 3 receivers in the class of Cooks, Woods and Kupp?

I think Cooks would fall under the category of a #1 receiver by any standards. And there aren't many of them. 10? As for the trio... none that I can think of off the top of my head. But, Woods, Kupp and TA/Reynolds is not comparable to what the addition of Cooks brings to the WR group.
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
6,734
Name
Jeff
Who would you give up last out of Cooks, Woods, Kupp, TA. Whoever that is, he's your #1.

You can choose from speed, possession, etc.

I'm gonna pick Cooks. A speed receiver that can catch. Easier to replace the others, not that I don't love the others.
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,554
The point I'm making is what is a true number one? Opinions vary. Is it a guy who defenses have to account for? Rotate more guys towards his side? Double team him most plays? Sacrifice elsewhere to keep him from making the big impact?

Or is it the guy a team targets the most? A particular favorite a QB likes to go to. If suppose if thats the case then 32 teams have a number one. Woods or Kupp would probably be our number one. But are either of them considered a true number one?

Jared: "My #1 WR is the guy who is the most open on any given play. My #1 varies from play to play."
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
This stat shows Brandin Cooks has trouble beating press coverage
By: Cameron DaSilva


https://theramswire.usatoday.com/2018/04/10/nfl-los-angeles-rams-brandin-cooks-press-coverage-stats/

Since coming into the NFL in 2014, Brandin Cooks has been one of the best deep threats in all of football. That shouldn’t surprise anyone after he ran a blazing 4.33 40-yard dash at the combine, turning a lot of heads in Indianapolis.

There’s no denying his speed or big-play ability, but given his size, he doesn’t win 50-50 balls the way Sammy Watkins does. Cooks often relies on separating enough to break away from the defender deep down the field.

As good as he is when it comes to breaking open deep, he does struggle against press coverage. Matt Harmon of Next Gen Stats charted his stats when pressed at the line of scrimmage, and needless to say, he hasn’t been good.

Brandin Cooks' success rate vs. press coverage (and attempts) in #ReceptionPerception

2014: 49.3% (73)
2015: 52.7% (110)
2016: 31.7% (41)
2017: 40.8% (98)
NFL avg: 66.5% (68)

— Matt Harmon (@MattHarmon_BYB) April 7, 2018


Of course, this isn’t the end-all, be-all factor when it comes to beating press coverage, but the fact that he’s below average suggests he struggles more than most receivers. That hasn’t prevented him from remaining as one of the best deep threats in the league, however. No receiver caught more passes 20 yards downfield than Cooks, who hauled in 16.

He also led the league with 55.5 percent of his yardage total coming on deep passes, which is obviously impressive.One way to combat press coverage is by moving a receiver into the slot, which you should expect the Rams to do on occasion. Cooper Kupp typically occupies that spot, but when Sean McVay goes to four-WR sets, Cooks can kick inside.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
I do know it seemed like he coulda caught a couple more deep balls with more effort. And his impact was not what we hoped for.
This seems to be the narrative around the web...all Rams sites....Sammy loafed...Sammy dogged it....Sammy didn't finish plays...
OK
Biggest game of the year...Sammy sees 2 passes...maybe one...until the 4th quarter.
Think we only had 7 points total at that point.
#1 scoring offense in the league.
Much like I question Belichick's decision to sit Butler....I question the decision to NOT target Watkins until the game was almost lost...I question the lack of use of Tavon...I question the reliance on the screen plays to Gurley...instead of some sort of decoy type thing...in the biggest game of the year...At home. That's not a Sammy issue. That's a game plan thingy.
Players are human...it's hard to continually run full speed down the field, when you're only involved in 2% of the plays as a primary target. It is....Is it right? No....But that's human nature...If Cooks is running constantly down the field without any looks, I'm sure his effort too...will wane.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
@BonifayRam

Would those numbers suggest he needs a bunch formation? Is he really just a slot receiver? You can't be holding the ball waiting for this guy to get free....

Oh...I wonder where Sammy ranks?
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
The point I'm making is what is a true number one? Opinions vary. Is it a guy who defenses have to account for? Rotate more guys towards his side? Double team him most plays? Sacrifice elsewhere to keep him from making the big impact?

Or is it the guy a team targets the most? A particular favorite a QB likes to go to. If suppose if thats the case then 32 teams have a number one. Woods or Kupp would probably be our number one. But are either of them considered a true number one?
Both....targets are said to show a QB's level of comfort with a wr....I kinda like that...Defenses game planning to take a target away....shows what the enemies think our most dangerous weapon is....Imagine Gurley. In some respects, Gurley is the weapon teams game plan against. Even his receiving game....Atl. was aggressively taking the Gurley screen and option passes away....and it killed our 3rd down offense.
As for the trio... none that I can think of off the top of my head.
Meh....Cleveland has one of the most awesome 3-somes on paper...Josh Gordon, Landry, Coleman.....on paper...It's all about utilization at this level.