steferfootball
Starter
Peyton Manning: PLEASE RETIRE!
I mean he is one of my favorite QBs, but I will like him more if he is retired.
I mean he is one of my favorite QBs, but I will like him more if he is retired.
@richeisen
Just had chat with Rams GM Les Snead. Sure sounded like he wants 3 first-rounders for #2 pick. Podcast will post later iTunes/NFL.com
MerlinJones said:Yamahopper said:What I'm questioning on trading the 2nd pick is where is the offers for Kalil? A elite LT is a rare commodity, they have always been targets of teams trading up like the Rams did for Pace. Either the RGIII talk has blurred this or maybe he's not viewed as elite.
But still I think there might be a team or two willing to step up for him.
Do you think that the value of Kalil and Grffin would be the same in regards to what the Rams could expect in return for the opportunity to draft either?
I still think you're going to get more from someone looking for a "franchise" QB.
bluecoconuts said:So what happens if Manning stays with the Colts? I know it's basically done that he is out of Indy, but I heard that the Colts are debating restructuring his contract and keeping him, so what if? Then they take Kalil at #1.
So does the #2 pick value go up because there is Luck sitting there? or down because teams know that there is still RG3 on the board?
He's not.bluecoconuts said:So what happens if Manning stays with the Colts?
X said:That 1997 draft that had the Rams jump from 6 to 1 to get Pace has all sorts of really interesting angles.
1. They could have stayed right where they were and picked Walter Jones (some say equally as good as Pace)
2. Jets wouldn't have traded that pick if Peyton Manning didn't decide to go back to Tennessee instead. And Peyton would have been a Jet.
3. The only QB drafted in the first round in 1997 was Jim (lol) Druckenmiller. And he 'fell' to 26.
4. You have to wonder where Pace would have been ranked in the *1998* draft with Peyton and Leaf there. Yeah, Leaf turned out to be a dud, but he certainly wasn't projected to be a dud.
Yep. It's kinda cool to go back and see how things *could* have worked out. A few years ago I did a re-draft of the Rams from 1993-2009 and listed all the guys they could have taken instead of who they actually did. It was a sick, sick roster. But that's not to say that they screwed up ALL the time (except 2005-2008). Sometimes needs had to be taken into account. Other times, they absolutely could have taken Marvin Harrison instead of Eddie Kennison.Yamahopper said:X said:That 1997 draft that had the Rams jump from 6 to 1 to get Pace has all sorts of really interesting angles.
1. They could have stayed right where they were and picked Walter Jones (some say equally as good as Pace)
2. Jets wouldn't have traded that pick if Peyton Manning didn't decide to go back to Tennessee instead. And Peyton would have been a Jet.
3. The only QB drafted in the first round in 1997 was Jim (lol) Druckenmiller. And he 'fell' to 26.
4. You have to wonder where Pace would have been ranked in the *1998* draft with Peyton and Leaf there. Yeah, Leaf turned out to be a dud, but he certainly wasn't projected to be a dud.
Kinda like if Bradford would have stayed in another year. Or if they wouldn't have fired Linehan and the Rams lost out and was able to grab Stafford.
Puzzling it is.
It wasn't a good deal know what we now know, but Pace was one heck of a prospect.X said:That 1997 draft that had the Rams jump from 6 to 1 to get Pace has all sorts of really interesting angles.
1. They could have stayed right where they were and picked Walter Jones (some say equally as good as Pace)
X said:He's not.bluecoconuts said:So what happens if Manning stays with the Colts?
You know, that's one I always wonder about. Marvin Harrison and Bruce together for ten years. What would have happened with GSOT? I think it's obvious that Holt would have never been drafted. If that's the case and we still had the #6 pick that year, we could have drafted Champ Bailey. How do you think that would have worked out? I love Torry, but having Harrison instead and Bailey is a much better situation. I've always wondered about that. Of course if we had Bruce and Harrison, we may have never fired Brooks in the first place. Or Banks may have done enough to get another year, and the Rams don't end up signing Green and having Warner as the #2. They may have never traded for Faulk, though I don't know how the two would be related.X said:Yep. It's kinda cool to go back and see how things *could* have worked out. A few years ago I did a re-draft of the Rams from 1993-2009 and listed all the guys they could have taken instead of who they actually did. It was a sick, sick roster. But that's not to say that they screwed up ALL the time (except 2005-2008). Sometimes needs had to be taken into account. Other times, they absolutely could have taken Marvin Harrison instead of Eddie Kennison.Yamahopper said:X said:That 1997 draft that had the Rams jump from 6 to 1 to get Pace has all sorts of really interesting angles.
1. They could have stayed right where they were and picked Walter Jones (some say equally as good as Pace)
2. Jets wouldn't have traded that pick if Peyton Manning didn't decide to go back to Tennessee instead. And Peyton would have been a Jet.
3. The only QB drafted in the first round in 1997 was Jim (lol) Druckenmiller. And he 'fell' to 26.
4. You have to wonder where Pace would have been ranked in the *1998* draft with Peyton and Leaf there. Yeah, Leaf turned out to be a dud, but he certainly wasn't projected to be a dud.
Kinda like if Bradford would have stayed in another year. Or if they wouldn't have fired Linehan and the Rams lost out and was able to grab Stafford.
Puzzling it is.
I tend to agree for a couple of reasons.MerlinJones said:I still think that with all of the needs that the Rams have trading the pick is the teams best option.
In regards to picking Matt Kalil at number 2;
Look at the teams that have won the Super Bowl the last several years. How many of them had "elite" left tackles? You have to go back to the Ravens and Jonathon Ogden in 2001.
Now, that's not to say that the other SB teams didn't have very good left tackles (as most had at least one pro bowl to their credit). If OL is the way they want to go they could still trade down a bit and be able to draft Reiff from Iowa or Martin from Stanford.
It would be nice to have an elite LT, but it's not absolutely necessary to win in the NFL. If the Rams could get a very good LT via free agency and use their high picks on impact "skill" position players (Claiborne, Blackmon, etc...) I think that would be a better way to go. Just my opinion.