Greg Robinson Declares For 2014 Draft

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Again, I think the addition of another quality OT hurts our chances for a trade down but increases our chances of drafting a good one.
 
Alan - I get where you are going with this but what if Bortles puts up combine / Pro Day performances that has a QB needy team just "have to have him"? All we need is one to be willing to overpay.
 
PhxRam said:
Max that was some fine twitter embed skills. You be leet.
Click to expand...
These old bastages and their protests when we first switched software...

NOW look at 'em. :heh:
 
BigRamFan adding to the mix:
Alan - I get where you are going with this but what if Bortles puts up combine / Pro Day performances that has a QB needy team just "have to have him"? All we need is one to be willing to overpay.
Click to expand...

I think you're right about that BigRam but there are two issues here. There are a bunch of teams that need a QB but there is another group of teams who desperately need a LT. His decision doesn't effect the first group but I think it has a big effect on the second group. Not for the better I would think.
 
Hey, I heard that! :mad: :razz:

I prefer the term curmudgeon.
 
PhxRam said:
I am sure one of the grumpy old men is stilling holding a grudge
Click to expand...
He'll get over it.

DIAx7bk.jpg
 
Alan said:
I think you're right about that BigRam but there are two issues here. There are a bunch of teams that need a QB but there is another group of teams who desperately need a LT. His decision doesn't effect the first group but I think it has a big effect on the second group. Not for the better I would think.
Click to expand...
But, for my liking at least, the QB needy teams are right in the wheelhouse of where I'd hope we'd be drafting. I hope we don't trade down too far. I also think QBs fetch a better asking price.

In another post you had suggested the possibility of 2 trade downs. That would be best case scenario, IMO as well. We trade with CLE to get to 4 so they get their choice of QB by leapfrogging JAX then we swap with ATL to 6 so then can prevent OAK from taking Clowney, all the while stockpiling early 2nd round picks. We could, theoretically at least pick 1-6 then 2-4 (CLE), 2-10(ours) and 2-12 (ATL). That would be 5 picks in the first 44!
 
Nice! You captured my best side. :woot:
:buttkisser: I'm adding this for old times' sake.
 
BigRamFan thinking clearly:
But, for my liking at least, the QB needy teams are right in the wheelhouse of where I'd hope we'd be drafting. I hope we don't trade down too far. I also think QBs fetch a better asking price.

In another post you had suggested the possibility of 2 trade downs. That would be best case scenario, IMO as well. We trade with CLE to get to 4 so they get their choice of QB by leapfrogging JAX then we swap with ATL to 6 so then can prevent OAK from taking Clowney, all the while stockpiling early 2nd round picks. We could, theoretically at least pick 1-6 then 2-4 (CLE), 2-10(ours) and 2-12 (ATL). That would be 5 picks in the first 44!
Click to expand...

Love it!

Yep, that was my dream too.

As for the first part though, I always like to keep all options open.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
We know better max. You're always coming up with good stuff like that and it's no accident.
 
LOL!

Be careful, I know where you get your burgers CGI. (insert our old smiley with the threatening bat that I was promised we'd get back :sad:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back