I want to see is Shula scrap this zone coverage and man up.
No one plays exclusively "man defense" any more. Defenses are more sophisticated in scheme. The flat fact is against the 9ers, the Ram defense was pretty confused with all the motion they had in their offensive scheme. It's more about discipline and tackling on defense because you're not gonna stop the offense every time. Take a look at a replay of the game. The Rams were not exclusively zone.All this talk about Puka is fine but the thing I want to see is Shula scrap this zone coverage and man up.
Not a fan of Ingle either as he cannot cover a bed, however, he is supposed to be great on special teams, but he was responsible for the punt block last year as he totally did not touch the guy across from him and ran down field and it was his guy who blocked the punt.Not a big fan of S Tanner Ingle. In preseason TI was often late to the party on all run & pass downs, when he was on time he whiffed on the tack. However he has played in 3 NFL gms & has 3 NFL preseasons under his belt. We should see TI see him playing up close to LOS in action this upcoming gm. with both safeties not running in full operation. Appears to me Rams like TI as a ST sorta ace. Rookie UDFA Safety Nick Anderson seriously outplayed him in pre season.
I would guess that veteran DL'er Larrell Murchison might get the callup to try to have a little extra pass rush out of the DL. We certainly need to see much better results from Branden Fiske & Desjuan Johnson. Will DJ officially start in place of MG opposite B.Young on that DL? Or will OLB'er Josaiah Stewart ?
DJ had 0 QB pressures/ 1 assisted tackle & no sacks on 15 snaps. DL BF - 2 QB pressures both were hurries, with no sacks/ 2 tackles 1 solo and 1 assist on 29 snaps. Seriously I expected so much better. UDFA Rookie DL'er Jaxson Moi was resigned to PS-16 in place of SS Tanner Ingle.
Not gonna happen against dart.All this talk about Puka is fine but the thing I want to see is Shula scrap this zone coverage and man up.
All this talk about Puka is fine but the thing I want to see is Shula scrap this zone coverage and man up.
I was confused about press coverage, man-to-man, and zone. Defenses can play press coverage with CBs close to the line of scrimmage. They can stay man-to-man or switch to zone coverage. I posted a video that goes over Spag's blitz packages and shows how they move the players around, in this thread.No one plays exclusively "man defense" any more. Defenses are more sophisticated in scheme. The flat fact is against the 9ers, the Ram defense was pretty confused with all the motion they had in their offensive scheme. It's more about discipline and tackling on defense because you're not gonna stop the offense every time. Take a look at a replay of the game. The Rams were not exclusively zone.
www.sharpfootballanalysis.com
"You know what's better than blueberries? Bananas."
We didn't have Puka last year against Jacksonville, and McVay's plan was masterful. I have confidence in a similar result. GO RAMS!
Only thing I see positive from this is that Stafford will actually distribute the ball more amongst the other offensive weapons which I am ok with if its going to help us win.We didn't have Puka last year against Jacksonville, and McVay's plan was masterful. I have confidence in a similar result. GO RAMS!
We thought we'd take advantage of the 49ers health issues. So I wouldn't get overly excited about this.That is one beat up secondary. Like seriously. On ESPN their LCB position is completely wiped out. In fact, the ONLY CB without a injury designation or IR is Colton Hood and 3 nicklebacks; Dru Philips, Nic Jones, and Nikko Reed. If we don't take advantage of this, I don't know what we are doing.
I was confused about press coverage, man-to-man, and zone. Defenses can play press coverage with CBs close to the line of scrimmage. They can stay man-to-man or switch to zone coverage. I posted a video that goes over Spag's blitz packages and shows how they move the players around, in this thread.
Here is a website that lists the man-to-man and zone for teams in week one. It's too much to post. The Rams were on the lower side, tied at #24 lowest at 9.4% just below the Whiners at 10.5%. The numbers may not be completely accurate. Teams do change week to week depending on opponents. The highest numbers were 46.9 to 26.9 for the top 5 man-to-man. Colts on top of the list.
![]()
NFL Secondary Statistics: Coverage Scheme Stats & Rates
Explore 2025 NFL coverage scheme data. See which defenses rely on man or zone coverage with our team-by-team percentage breakdown.www.sharpfootballanalysis.com
Another site has 13.9 man coverages.
View: https://x.com/QBsMVP/status/2098265575029870616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2098265575029870616%7Ctwgr%5E40cb1a26fc56e232df1c036864396955b7b8bdbf%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheramswire.usatoday.com%2Fstory%2Fsports%2Fnfl%2Frams%2F2026%2F09%2F17%2Frams-sean-mcvay-49ers-week-1-trent-mcduffie-jaylen-watson%2F91800350007%2F
I was pointing out that press coverage can be either man or zone. The Rams did see some blitzes and some press coverage. They couldn't cover Mike Evans, who got away with some push-offs. Hard to blame Lake, but a quicker CB could help. The Jet lag, first game , Garrett being hurt effected the Rams. I rewatched the condensed video. The Rams did have poor execution.Some teams that played good defense weren't in man coverage that much. Mostly zone. Seattle at 6 percent dominate the Patriots offense. I guess its not so much the scheme as it is executing. Rams have some talented players on defense. Why was the execution so poor? Coaching? Jet lag? No cohesiveness with the new guys? All of the above? If its a problem with the cohesiveness I wonder how long it will take to get there?