G Jonah Jackson and his salary traded to the Bears for 2025 6th rd pick

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,219
sounds tempting but who at 3 would we like? My money would be an OT.
Honestly I'm thinking one of the QB's and Travis Hunter would be available.

I'd love Travis but we could hold a team over the barrel to trade up for a QB like the Jets at 7. With the aim to be able to upgrade 3-6 positions to league wide starting caliber this draft.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,219
Yes, but I'd never pay that much if I were the Giants.
I don't think some people understand the entire Giants FO and coaching staff jobs are on the line by Thanksgiving if they don't win. I think they'd do that for sure getting back a 1. That also fills 2 of there big 5 holes.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
42,419
If somebody gives us a pick then great otherwise I'm keeping him. Also stealing this from another site.
9llyet.jpg
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,219
How the cap looks if we trade Kupp, Stafford, and Jackson who each three have a potential to be moved before free agency.
Screenshot (2).png
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,219
There's potential there to really cook something up.
There really is. Trading those three isn’t the end of the world but I’m feeling Stafford and a deal gets done. 90% ✅. I’d be very surprised if it doesn’t.
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
5,307
There's potential there to really cook something up.
I think this is why Darnold is still an option for us. We will have the cap room to sign him. I'm not saying I would, but if McVay likes him, we could get it done.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,940
I don't think some people understand the entire Giants FO and coaching staff jobs are on the line by Thanksgiving if they don't win. I think they'd do that for sure getting back a 1. That also fills 2 of there big 5 holes.
I think people understand their jobs are on the line AND giving up the 3rd is immediate grounds for dismissal.

A healthy package of other picks and possibly next years 1 is definitely out there.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,862
Name
Scott
I think people understand their jobs are on the line AND giving up the 3rd is immediate grounds for dismissal.

A healthy package of other picks and possibly next years 1 is definitely out there.
I would take 2 and a 4, and a conditional 2 next year that could elevate to a #1. Maybe you give them back a 6 next year. We have multiple 6's again next year.
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
6,495
There really is. Trading those three isn’t the end of the world but I’m feeling Stafford and a deal gets done. 90% ✅. I’d be very surprised if it doesn’t.
How much if we only trade Kupp and Jackson?
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
6,495
I think this is why Darnold is still an option for us. We will have the cap room to sign him. I'm not saying I would, but if McVay likes him, we could get it done.
I think we could be competitive with him. I just don't think we'd win a super bowl. I'm still one of the few sickos who would swallow the pill and let Aaron Rodgers join the team.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,219
I think people understand their jobs are on the line AND giving up the 3rd is immediate grounds for dismissal.

A healthy package of other picks and possibly next years 1 is definitely out there.
Has terminating a GM/HC ever happened here in late February/March? Especially with getting Stafford they’d have a minimum time frame of Thanksgiving, and probably by then they’d be at least .500 if not winning record.

Nope. I 100% think their current staff would.

However I think it’s a moot point since I think Stafford and them will work a deal for a minimum of two years.
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
6,122
I don't think we make a pick at 3. We'd trade down for a haul. No chance I'd take Sanders there. If Ward was there, perhaps.
That's what I'd do. That's why I keep thinking Stafford is possibly gone as the desperation of ine team is what it takes.
 

XXXIVwin

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Messages
5,170
I think this is why Darnold is still an option for us. We will have the cap room to sign him. I'm not saying I would, but if McVay likes him, we could get it done.
No chance McVay likes Darnold...or at least I hope not. McVay praised MS by saying something like, "he brings out the best in the biggest moments."

I watched Darnold in 3 games last year-- vs. the Rams in season, vs. Detroit at end of season, and vs. Rams in playoffs. 3 big games, and Darnold was terrible in all 3. Especially the last 2, 2 HUGE games. Darnold was just AWFUL in our playoff game, like a deer in the headlights.

This board would go nuts with disappointment if we signed Darnold. I can't imagine McVay is considering him.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
42,419
No chance McVay likes Darnold...or at least I hope not. McVay praised MS by saying something like, "he brings out the best in the biggest moments."

I watched Darnold in 3 games last year-- vs. the Rams in season, vs. Detroit at end of season, and vs. Rams in playoffs. 3 big games, and Darnold was terrible in all 3. Especially the last 2, 2 HUGE games. Darnold was just AWFUL in our playoff game, like a deer in the headlights.

This board would go nuts with disappointment if we signed Darnold. I can't imagine McVay is considering him.
Kevin O'Connell likes Darnold there's a very very good chance that McVay does as well. And Darnold IMO wouldn't be a long term signing just a bridge guy, we'd draft a guy as well.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,760
Way we're going we probably couldn't afford Darnold. Of course Rams could bend it how they need to but still damn.
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,385
Name
Desmal M
Has terminating a GM/HC ever happened here in late February/March? Especially with getting Stafford they’d have a minimum time frame of Thanksgiving, and probably by then they’d be at least .500 if not winning record.

Nope. I 100% think their current staff would.

However I think it’s a moot point since I think Stafford and them will work a deal for a minimum of two years.
If I was an owner and the GM and HC were on a short leash, I'd make them consult me before any big trades or moves. You can't risk them being desperate and mortgaging multiple future years to save their jobs in the present.