Eagles at Bears

[Rainram]

That was a rough half of football.

 

[Oregonram]

Trubisky should have at least 3 INT’s in the first half. And if the official hadn’t blown his whistle after that completed pass/fumble Chicago would not have 6 points right now. Will this catch up to Chicago in the second half, or are the Bears going to be this years version of Forrest Gump luck merchants.

 

[Loyal]

But if the Bears aren't the 2017 Rams who were those Rams? and who are the Bears? perhaps the Lions of 2006?

One helluva lot better offense than the sucky 2018 Bears. I know you've heard the stupid comparisons...

 

[Oregonram]

I will laugh so hard if the Colts beat the Chiefs next week. I don’t care how many no look passed Mahomes throws.

 

[RhodyRams]

and I took the over

:rant:alm:

 

[Mackeyser]

Chargers and Colts looked really good. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if one or both win on the road...

 

[Q729]

I thought the new NFL was high scoring. This is more like the old high school football.

Exactly.

 

[LesBaker]

In hindsight the ref calling the pass incomplete is understandable. He didn't have the angle.

Now as far as it being a fumble, technically it wasn't because he blew the whistle and called the pass incomplete. So the play is over as he called it and the review angles prove that it was a catch and fumble, but the call on the field was backed by the replay ref.

But that was a legit fumble other than the whistle making it not a fumble.

So. It was a catch and a fumble without factoring in the whistle.

But the call was incomplete pass and the whistle said so.

 

[hotanez]

I will laugh so hard if the Colts beat the Chiefs next week. I don’t care how many no look passed Mahomes throws.

I would be surprised if they did but it would be funny as hell

 

[Q729]

Exactly. Didn't they used to have some kind of "inadvertent" whistle ruling somewhere before?
"...therefore the previous play is not reviewable."

 

[RhodyRams]

In hindsight the ref calling the pass incomplete is understandable. He didn't have the angle.

Now as far as it being a fumble, technically it wasn't because he blew the whistle and called the pass incomplete. So the play is over as he called it and the review angles prove that it was a catch and fumble, but the call on the field was backed by the replay ref.

But that was a legit fumble other than the whistle making it not a fumble.

So. It was a catch and a fumble without factoring in the whistle.

But the call was incomplete pass and the whistle said so.

:seizure: :seizure: :seizure: :seizure: :seizure: :seizure: :seizure:

 

[LesBaker]

Bellamy of the Bears big time hold he got away with there

 

[hotanez]

which team has a better chance at beating the Saints? Eagles or Cowboys?

 

[Ramrocket]

which team has a better chance at beating the Saints? Eagles or Cowboys?

I'm not sure either can after what I've seen yesterday and today but if I had to pick one, I'd say the Cowboys, just.

 

[swmizzou83]

which team has a better chance at beating the Saints? Eagles or Cowboys?

I would say the cowboys. They can run the ball and keep it away from Brees. Plus they have a pretty decent defense

 

[RamBall]

which team has a better chance at beating the Saints? Eagles or Cowboys?

That would go the cowboys, but I believe it will be the Rams that knock off new orleans.

 

[Loyal]

Chicago's best QB in the last 10 years

 

[RamBall]

These defenseless receiver penalties have gotten out of hand. What are you supposed to do just let the guy make a catch and hope somebody tackles him?