E TU WARNER???

[Corbin]

@Merlin great thread name!

 

[Merlin]

@Merlin great thread name!

Thx lol. I was laughing when I posted it.

 

[Merlin]

It's ettu

Where is my facepalm button???

 

[RamsFan4Life]

It's ettu

You sure?

HS Latin is a long way in the rear view mirror but I thought "et tu" meant "and thou"......what I miss?

 

[Merlin]

Looks like Et tu is the right version. Whoops!

< highschool dropout.

 

[coconut]

Kurt can do whatever he wants
#13

What's that Kurt, you want to go in the HOF as a Cardinal and kick DtB in the nuts?

 

[rams1fan]

Looks like Et tu is the right version. Whoops!

< highschool dropout.

E tu would be "from you". I could see that working.

 

[norcalramfan]

It's ettu

I thought it was eff u.

 

[TK42-RAM]

Something about Cam Newton reminds me of Kurt Warner -- just some of his mannerisms are very similar.

Anyone else see it or do I need to adjust my helmet?

 

[Legatron4]

My top 10 QB list

1. Tom Brady
2. Drew Brees
3. Aaron Rodgers
4. Patrick Mahomes
5. Jared Goff
6. Russell Wilson
7. Andrew Luck
8. Phillip Rivers
9. Matt Ryan
10. Ben Roethlisberger

Any top whatever list should be based off 2 years of play. It doesn’t matter what Russell Wilson did 5 years ago. He hasn’t won more then 10 games since the Super Bowl season. I base rankings off healthiness, production and wins. Regardless of your environment.

 

[Elmgrovegnome]

You sure?

HS Latin is a long way in the rear view mirror but I thought "et tu" meant "and thou"......what I miss?

Looks like Et tu is the right version. Whoops!

< highschool dropout.

I'm just going by my crossword puzzles. It's always ettu in them.

 

[Memento]

That is why I only see Kurt as a Cardinal. Goff easily ranks above most of the guys on the list.

 

[rams1fan]

Mahomes is the only young QB on the list. Seems Kurt is just favoring vets.

 

[snackdaddy]

Everybody's got their opinions about quarterbacks. Really means nothing. Looks like Warner's list is mostly established veteran quarterbacks aside from Mahomes who was the MVP. If he's got Cam Newton on that list he's definitely using using past accomplishments. Because today I don't think he's top 15.

 

[RamsFan4Life]

I thought it was eff u.

for a minute there I thought X had hit up the college for some perfessers!! You have restored my faith!!!

 

[bluecoconuts]

This is America, Warner has every right to be wrong, and wrong he is.

 

[ScotsRam]

There is no way I would rank Newton in the top 10. Hell Goff is better and should be in the rankings if you are going to include Newton. Mahomes!!?? He's only had one year! No body of work to show he can play at that level consistently. Pre-injury Andrew Luck and you would have no argument from me. But he hasn't proved he's all the way back. He was a great QB pre-injury and right now he's a good QB, who has a long way to go to get back to where he was.

Sorry Kurt but too many assumptions about the future.

I strongly disagree with this. Mahomes was so unbelievably transcendent last year that you have to have him on this list. Even if he doesn't perform at that level consistently, if he comes down a notch or even two he's still as good as anyone else.

Andrew Luck had statistically his best season last year for an impressive squad that won a playoff game. He should actually be higher imo.

Newton is the only one I would disagree with. Goff is probably in that 10th spot sort of range for QBs at this point - which is still really pretty good.

 

[KNUCKLEHEAD]

It's ettu

Literally the first time I have seen it written that way.

 

[Merlin]

I strongly disagree with this. Mahomes was so unbelievably transcendent last year that you have to have him on this list. Even if he doesn't perform at that level consistently, if he comes down a notch or even two he's still as good as anyone else.

Andrew Luck had statistically his best season last year for an impressive squad that won a playoff game. He should actually be higher imo.

Newton is the only one I would disagree with. Goff is probably in that 10th spot sort of range for QBs at this point - which is still really pretty good.

What cracks me up about any list like this is they never start with the order of things. Before they start ranking they should identify what the most important measurables are and prioritize them, then order them however they feel is best. THEN crunch the QB numbers and see how things look.

Most of these clowns start with Super Bowl wins or Playoff appearances etc. Then get into use of yards or TDs or passer rating to try to backup their biased BS.

 

[rams1fan]

Literally the first time I have seen it written that way.

It is really two words. Et is "and" and Tu is "you". So literally "and you".