- Joined
- Aug 7, 2010
- Messages
- 12,111
- Name
- Rambeau
Love it.
The thing is, the other side of the coin, just like all the differing opinions of our posters, all have their own validity. It's what makes for great conversations. Other than great sex, is there anything better than good intelligent conversations among friends?
I was talking in this FA period. We're just bringing the same people back. Dunbar wasn't very good last year. He is limited in what he can do. Was looking for a upgrade. Treading water.
He's a good two down LB. As long as we don't expect him to play pass coverage we're fine.
Armstrong could play passing downs, or at least you'd think he could, since he's a converted safety. If they do try to work him in more, having him come in on obvious passing situations could be a good place to start.
That stuff looks like a lot of fun and if I could do it in 80F weather I'd be right there. How about water skiing in the Bahamas?OnceARam liking that cold weather:
Skiing. Skiing is def up there.
Makes you jealous doesn't it? It can be a curse you know.PhxRam showing wisdom beyond his years:
Lmao.. notch like a forked tongue?
Ogletree would be my guess. I read one of the talking heads saying that too but I'm gonna say Ogletree anyway.Ramsey thinking blitz:
Gregg Williams love to have a blitzing OLB. Whose that guy? Ray Ray? Olgetree? Dunbar? 2014 Draft Pick?
Sometimes treading water on a position that is not a huge need for a scheme is a good thing. I personally like what Dunbar brings. I don't view anything this new regime has done as being just bringing the same people back. They've allowed certain people to test the market and then been able to keep the scheme fits. Let's not throw babies out with bath water and assume that is a good move. We actually DO have some pretty good players here. Returning to OUR system is not by default a bad thing. And I think GW is good indicator of what THIS system wants. I don't think Dunbar is someone we couldn't replace in the draft but there are still a lot of other holes to fill with other cheap contracts. Dunbar's seems pretty cheap to me.I was talking in this FA period. We're just bringing the same people back. Dunbar wasn't very good last year. He is limited in what he can do. Was looking for a upgrade. Treading water.
You've just described a large portion of the Rams roster.Yeah - that will be interesting. I think he has a lot of talent but can he really harness it?
Sometimes treading water on a position that is not a huge need for a scheme is a good thing. I personally like what Dunbar brings. I don't view anything this new regime has done as being just bringing the same people back. They've allowed certain people to test the market and then been able to keep the scheme fits. Let's not throw babies out with bath water and assume that is a good move. We actually DO have some pretty good players here. Returning to OUR system is not by default a bad thing. And I think GW is good indicator of what THIS system wants. I don't think Dunbar is someone we couldn't replace in the draft but there are still a lot of other holes to fill with other cheap contracts. Dunbar's seems pretty cheap to me.
He wasn't sure what the definition of the word "the" is.Who are you? Bill freakin Clinton? Oral is sex! So Al's got it covered.![]()
Makes you jealous doesn't it? It can be a curse you know.
Good deal for Rams, frees Snead to do what he does best, move and improviseIan Rapoport @RapSheet 4m
LB Jo-Lonn Dunbar agrees to terms on a 2-year deal with the #Rams, per source. It can be worth up to $3.5M