It's understood that it's always stupid to throw the ball from inside the 5.When we were debating the San Diego call, it was brought up there was a similar call vs. Dallas, it worked, and no one said a word then.
Yeah, but I'm thinking he would of scored the first time. Then this thread wouldn't exist. We'd all be choking on that hideous combo of greens and blues they got going on in Seattle until draft day.But you've said 100 times out of 100, you would run Lynch. That kind of predictability WOULD be noticed and played to. That's why an OC *has* to be unpredictable, and why being unpredictable and it not working is not a bad call.
Now, could Lynch score even if the Patriots were totally keyed to the run? Possibly. I don't agree that's 80% though, and the fickle fans will still hate you and say it was a bad call even if it didn't work.
I would have too.Yeah, but I'm thinking he would of scored the first time. Then this thread wouldn't exist. We'd all be choking on that hideous combo of greens and blues they got going on in Seattle until draft day.
And I'm all for the unpredictable. I may have called a fake to Lynch and let Wilson bootleg it to the corner or loft it to a TE in the corner. It still would of been a run call first though. The 100 out of 100 comment is just my confidence of Lynch caving somebody's sternum in to cross the goal line in that situation.
Didn't look like they played the pass to me.The pass would have been understandable if it wasn't an empty backfield set, once Lynch motioned out the defense knew they didn't have to worry about a run. Then they knew they could defend the pass 100%, awful call motioning your star RB. You could use Marshawn as a decoy to throw the defense off to benefit the pass but to essentially show the defense your hand, in the super bowl, on the final drive/play of the game, straight stupid.
Of course. In our mind (and I'm including myself in this too), our after the game coaching ALWAYS would have worked. And we can never be proven wrong in that. And no call that works (pass or run) is ever going to be questioned, so of course this thread wouldn't exist.Yeah, but I'm thinking he would of scored the first time. Then this thread wouldn't exist. We'd all be choking on that hideous combo of greens and blues they got going on in Seattle until draft day.
Like -X-, I probably would have run myself too. I just don't agree it was some obvious bad call to pass.And I'm all for the unpredictable. I may have called a fake to Lynch and let Wilson bootleg it to the corner or loft it to a TE in the corner. It still would of been a run call first though. The 100 out of 100 comment is just my confidence of Lynch caving somebody's sternum in to cross the goal line in that situation.
Isn't that exactly what we did in the SD game? I seem to remember Cunningham being the back and motioning out the same way??The pass would have been understandable if it wasn't an empty backfield set, once Lynch motioned out the defense knew they didn't have to worry about a run. Then they knew they could defend the pass 100%, awful call motioning your star RB. You could use Marshawn as a decoy to throw the defense off to benefit the pass but to essentially show the defense your hand, in the super bowl, on the final drive/play of the game, straight stupid.
Yes, bad call, but Hill (and Wilson) didn't execute, and NFL qb has to know if slant is not there. . . .throw it awayI was at that San Diego game and I couldn't freaking believe we blew it like that. At least it wasn't the Super Bowl in front of a billion people. The Seacunt fans have go to be suicidal. Between all the rain and now this. Look out.
One guy to beat. Probably looked like a sure-thing to Wilson.Yes, bad call, but Hill (and Wilson) didn't execute, and NFL qb has to know if slant is not there. . . .throw it away
I don't know how obvious of a bad call it was but a pass just wouldn't have come up as an option in my thinking, not with two downs and a TO in my pocket. Of course, before the play, like I'd think NE would too, I fully expected a Lynch run but it is the NFL and you have to be prepared for both. NE was obviously prepared for both so I guess they didn't sell out on stopping Lynch.Of course. In our mind (and I'm including myself in this too), our after the game coaching ALWAYS would have worked. And we can never be proven wrong in that. And no call that works (pass or run) is ever going to be questioned, so of course this thread wouldn't exist.
Like -X-, I probably would have run myself too. I just don't agree it was some obvious bad call to pass.
WHY are you unhappy that the seahawks lost?Awful. Game was in hand. No doubt PC wanted to prove some kind of point by passing it there. rather than play it safe and run the clock and punch it in. Dumbazz. Why put the ball in the air? Run it 4 times if you have to. aaaauuugggghhhh
Didn't look like they played the pass to me.
If we had S-Jax and we did that on first down . . . I'd be furious. With Shaun Hill and whoever we had in backfield,. I was ticked at that, and Stacy or Mason are not S-Jax . .If I'm Lynch I'd get out of Seattle because they didn't trust him with the ball at the one yard line to get in. His whole entire career in Seattle they relied on him for the big play and when the Superbowl was on the line, Seattle didn't give it to him. Monster deal or not, I'd be pissed.
But congrats to the Seacocks for chocking away their victory. A 'classy' organization like yours deserves a painful loss. Hopefully some of these a-holes will jump of the bandwagon.
Otto Graham.
And nobody else is in the conversation if your going to go "old school" mkay.