It may seem obvious, but let's dial back the cynicism to ask one question:
Are there any teams in the NFL in the past 10 years that essentially will chose to live and die by their starting QB no matter HOW BAD they play?
The answer is an unqualified yes.
Not every team is willing to bench a starting QB, especially if they are considered one of the best in the NFL.
Ben Roethlisberger could have back to back 6 INT games... and other than reporters wondering if he had a concussion or other injury, nothing would change. His play would have to be so outrageously bad over an extended period before Mike Tomlin would even consider a change.
So... what this story may be referring to is that Goff simply IS NOT one of those QBs to this organization. He won't have an unlimited leash.
I expect great things from young Goff. I said that we was only a mistake in the context that Fisher would misuse and underdevelop him, but put in an offense like Asshole Face's, he would thrive. Well, I think McVay's offense may just be as good or better for Goff than Payton's WCO.
That said, if he struggles, which I don't expect...at all... seems the leak is stating that the organization is committed to winning, not individual people.
After all we've been through, that's a good sign.
That we have someone who is developing BOTH Goff and Mannion (because QBs never get injured in this league...ever) is an even BETTER sign.
Yes, obvious is obvious, but it's not universal. The Pats, Steelers, Falcons, Chargers, Raiders (presuming they quit farting around and sign Derek Carr), and Saints certainly aren't in this category and their may be others.
It only means that Goff is gonna have to earn it. And I know no one has a problem with this team FINALLY becoming a full meritocracy where the best guy PLAYS.
I don't care if it's Goff, Mannion or some camp arm.
It's TIME to get back to our formerly winning ways, Rams brothers. And while I expect it to be Goff at the helm, I just want to us to WIN.