Clemens was solid but uneven when we needed him most and that fumble did cost us the game.
I don't put a loss on any one player, but his turnover at the end of the game resulting in the game winning TD sure didn't help us win.
Much like last week. If he doesn't turn the ball over twice last week, we most likely win.
POINT: Clemens does nothing to win a game for us.... Usually breaks down at some point and (other players mistakes also count...) does something to cost us the game.. e.g. fumble, int., or bad pass...
Well- Foles is a backup and threw for 7 TD's today.
Backups are still professionals.
POINT: No one knows how a young player will perform in a game situation until put into that situation. Up until one mediocre pre-season game this year Davis was thoughT to be our #2. Davis appeared to have even out performed Clemens during the pre-season,
PRESEASON #s per ESPN
CLEMENS------------ 23/44 --- 349 yds ---- 2 TDs ---- 4 Ints
DAVIS--------------- 28/54 --- 305 yds ---- 3 TDs ---- 0 Ints
other than Schotty feeling MORE COMFORTABLE with the VETERAN Clemens. If the Rams are happy with just finishing out the season and being happy with the CHANCE of Clemens NOT LOSING a game for us, then I guess He is our man. But if we want to try something different with a chance to see what the unknown is capable of, I wish they would give Davis a try. Worst case, we lose, he crashes, and we move on and look for someone in the draft. Best case, Davis turns out to be good enough to keep and we use that pick on another position. If not for Trent Greene's injury, we would possibly have never seen Kurt Warner's potential. Without Don Majkowski's injury, we would never have known Brett Favre's potential. I could go on and on, but fact is that we will never know Davis' potential if not given the chance.