No doubt i agree, but in no way shape or form are they going to even consider taking a DT high when you got a DT2 in Langford that is getting 4 mill i believe it is, if we draft a DT high he'll be a starter IMO.We need the depth.
No doubt i agree, but in no way shape or form are they going to even consider taking a DT high when you got a DT2 in Langford that is getting 4 mill i believe it is, if we draft a DT high he'll be a starter IMO.We need the depth.
No doubt i agree, but in no way shape or form are they going to even consider taking a DT high when you got a DT2 in Langford that is getting 4 mill i believe it is, if we draft a DT high he'll be a starter IMO.
You know that argument assumes all receivers are the same, and that that's not really the case... right? Of that group, only Quick was projected to be a possible #1 type, and it was known he'd be a project for that.Snead & Fisher in 2012 & 2013 have had ten draft selections in day 1 & day 2 of both drafts. Only ONE of the TEN premium draft picks invested into Ram lineman. We took a WR with the first pick in 2013, first pick in the 2nd rd. in 2012 & the 3rd pick in 2013 & now more of my ROD friends want to continue with this pattern with another WR with the overall #2 pick in the draft....made very little difference in the Rams having a winning season
. I think Snead knows this & he is smart enough to break this playtoy draft selection pattern he & Fisher have found themselves in.
I agree with you actually I just don't see us drafting Donald to be a rotational player especially if it's going to take the 13th pick which i believe is around where he should be selected. I just think Snisher wants to improve the back end of the defense to fit Gregg Williams scheme to a tee.They better consider it. Donald is special. 6'1" 285-290 with dominant film and now he's tearing up the combine. Allow him to develop a year behind Langford while rotating, playing on passing downs and adding weight in a NFL S&C Program then cut Langford at 2014.
Guy ran a 4.65 40 at 285 pounds. He won every major national award in 2013 that a college DL could win. He was the best player at the Senior Bowl.
This is the type of guy that you regret passing on a few years down the road. This is a John Randle type talent. And I know that's crazy high praise. Putting him on a DL with Brockers, Long and Quinn is straight up unfair.
I'm not trying to win. I'm trying to convert more Donald believers! :wink:
Just can't agree Jerry. The first 2 minutes I watched the OG pushed HIM back.He looked average in that game? Man, you have impossibly high standards for DTs if that's average.
Wasn't strong enough against FSU? He put their OG on his behind or on skates at least a few times in that game. How many times was he blown off the ball? Very rarely.
You know that argument assumes all receivers are the same, and that that's not really the case... right? Of that group, only Quick was projected to be a possible #1 type, and it was known he'd be a project for that. Plus, the argument does ignore that the biggest free agency signing of Snisher-dom has been a Left Tackle. There's wanting your man, and then there's the "My way is smart, your way is something else." approach. The former is fine, the latter... let's just say you wouldn't appreciate it directed at you. Also, Bailey was the 4th pick by the Rams in 2013, after Austin, Ogletree and McDonald.
Not sure why you think he directed that at you or your position. I think Bonifay is just voicing his view. And it doesn't go along with needing another flashy player. I wouldn't go the personal route because I don't think he meant it that way.You know that argument assumes all receivers are the same, and that that's not really the case... right? Of that group, only Quick was projected to be a possible #1 type, and it was known he'd be a project for that.
Plus, the argument does ignore that the biggest free agency signing of Snisher-dom has been a Left Tackle.
There's wanting your man, and then there's the "My way is smart, your way is something else." approach. The former is fine, the latter... let's just say you wouldn't appreciate it directed at you.
Also, Bailey was the 4th pick by the Rams in 2013, after Austin, Ogletree and McDonald.
Don't really need a PM. Look at the quoted message.I was under the impression that we were discussing the draft Boffo97. You might want to help me out in understanding fully the below comment in a PM. "There's wanting your man, and then there's the "My way is smart, your way is something else." approach. The former is fine, the latter... let's just say you wouldn't appreciate it directed at you." I really do feel that this Rams teams needs a heavy dose of lineman both sides & it would be very smart to draft the Rams some.
Don't you see an implication there regarding the opposite opinion?now more of my ROD friends want to continue with this pattern with another WR with the overall #2 pick in the draft....made very little difference in the Rams having a winning season
. I think Snead knows this & he is smart enough to break this playtoy draft selection pattern he & Fisher have found themselves in.
I'm in the getting great players camp. Donald is almost as can't miss as any player in this draft.I'm just not in the DT early camp. I'm sure this guy will be very good. I just think we are in pretty decent shape there and would rather work on positions that will get us more points. I'd put Evans and Watkins ahead of Donald with any pick we would have in the top 15. I want top talent on the O-line first and foremost and wouldn't be the least bit upset if we took a OT with our first pick and a Guard with our 1st pick of the 2nd round.
But at least Donald can run faster than Suh. So when Suh comes off the bench to kick Donald, he won't be able to catch him.
Not to argue, but watching that video against FSU (I didn't watch ALL of it) he looked like he got handled pretty well by the OG.
It's just a small sample of course but I don't see what you do. He's doesn't look any better than what we already have a DT. JMO
Maybe you're right. Personally, I doubt that very much. As great as he is in college and as impressive as his numbers are in the Combine, I'm not convinced he will be able to burst through NFL O-lines. Aside from ours of course if we don't spend some capital and beef up.I'm in the getting great players camp. Donald is almost as can't miss as any player in this draft.
Maybe you're right. Personally, I doubt that very much. As great as he is in college and as impressive as his numbers are in the Combine, I'm not convinced he will be able to burst through NFL O-lines. Aside from ours of course if we don't spend some capital and beef up.
Also, I prefer making it more difficult to throw over your interior line. I wouldn't doubt that he would be an upgrade over Langford but a can't miss player? I don't put him in that small group.
His first step and initial quickness is absurd and insane. Combine that with a strong swim move and elite closing speed and this guy's going to burst through some NFL O-lines and make plays. Dominated the senior bowl practices and the game against future NFL O-linemen.Maybe you're right. Personally, I doubt that very much. As great as he is in college and as impressive as his numbers are in the Combine, I'm not convinced he will be able to burst through NFL O-lines. Aside from ours of course if we don't spend some capital and beef up.
Also, I prefer making it more difficult to throw over your interior line. I wouldn't doubt that he would be an upgrade over Langford but a can't miss player? I don't put him in that small group.
I recommend watching all of it. I can't believe a guy was handled in a game where he could have realistically sacked the QB 5 times.