- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 11,350
- Name
- Scott
I'd rather pick up Morgan Fairchild.I'd rather pick up Morgan Freeman.
I'd rather pick up Morgan Fairchild.I'd rather pick up Morgan Freeman.
He couldn't beat out McCown who they just cut so not seeing the starter you are but fair enough.Because I don't see the three Is.
I see a guy who would be a starting caliber backup that still has potential. IMO, he's proven he can be a Kyle Orton type QB. And that's easily the best of anything on the market but is still young and has upside. Would be the best of a bad situation to hedge our bets behind Bradford.
I'd rather pick up Josh Freeman
And yet I'd still prefer her.Both Morgan Fairchild and Morgan Freeman are waaaaaaaaaaaaay past their prime.
I'd rather pick up Morgan Freeman.
No thanks to McCown. Hopefully the Bucs are still willing to deal Glennon.
He couldn't beat out McCown who they just cut so not seeing the starter you are but fair enough.
Unlikely now. They'll want a vet QB that knows their system to ease in a rookie QB. I'm thinking Glennon might be staying now.
Brett Favre apparently couldn't beat out Chris Miller and Billy Joe Tolliver. How did he end up in the HOF?
Hard to beat a player out when there isn't a fair competition for the spot.
6'7" prototypical?Boasting prototypical size and a strong arm, though, Glennon is sure to attract suitors willing to gamble on a bounce-back season with better coaching and consistent blocking.
I'd rather pick up Morgan Fairchild.
Come on jrry, I don't think that was the issue in GB back in the day. Different era. Guys were brought along much slower and Favre did not look good when he stepped in for those guys initially but that was a really small sample size. Favre had done things in school that Glennon could only hope to have done. Favre was also not a statue. I don't think Favre was in a situation where there wasn't a "fair" competition, per se.
And I'm not sure there was an issue of fair competition with Glennon, he got chances to play last year. Is it at all possible that you've gone all in on Glennon because he's really the only other option beside Bradford to lead the Rams next year? Is it possible you're only looking for the positives with him or only looking for reasons that he was held back?
I'm not arguing that we shouldn't pick up Glennon, actually for the right price, I think he could be an intriguing option - the most intriguing option when you take in the crap QB class in the draft this year. I liked the NFL.com write up I just pasted above in that I think it's got a fair assessment of Glennon. If a team picks him up, I think you work hard to coach him up and hope that better coaching and a stable oline improves his play to something akin to 2013. He's a risk with some strengths and some warts.
I'd rather pick up Morgan Fairchild.
I'm not talking GB, I'm talking Atlanta. Glanville did not like Favre. Favre partied too much back then. Going to Green Bay was good for him because had he stayed in Atlanta, I don't think he would have gotten a chance to shine until Glanville was gone.
There wasn't going to be a fair competition there because Glanville didn't like Favre. As for what Favre did in college...I gotta disagree:
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/brett-favre-1.html
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/mike-glennon-1.html
There's no doubt Favre was more mobile and more talented than Glennon. That wasn't my point. Although, Glennon isn't a guy that I'd call a statue. He has good functional mobility in the pocket and enough athleticism to scramble out of it.
Nope. That's not it at all. I've been frank and honest with Glennon's negatives and what I expect him to be(which isn't a superstar).
Glennon got a chance to play last year while McCown was injured...and then McCown became the starter again when he was healthy...despite the fact that he got outplayed.
I don't think either of us would call that fair competition. It would have been like demoting Zac Stacy for Daryl Richardson in 2013 when Richardson got over his foot injury and claiming that Stacy "lost" a "fair" competition.
I think we can all agree on that. And if he only rises to his 2013 level, we're going to need to look for a QB of the future if Bradford isn't it.
Because 2013 Glennon isn't enough for me either. Still, the guy right now offers about what Kyle Orton offers(but much younger with upside)...a starting caliber game manager. And that's likely the best of a bad situation for us...unless we can grab Winston/Mariota or a better veteran QB.
Regardless, Glennon is just a backup QB option to Bradford, in my mind. But he's the best one I've seen out there in terms of price.
Dammit, jrry, when you're this thoughtful and reasonable... it just doesn't feel like a message board!