Brandin Cooks Traded to Houston Texans

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamnSD

Rookie
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
144
Name
RamnSD
Too bad the Rams signed him to an $81 million contract in 2018. Cooks is costing them $21.8 million in dead money this year.
 

thirteen28

I like pizza.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
8,406
Name
Erik

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
14,470
I do think that TGs goal line talent will be missed. He has been incredible at getting into the End Zone.

That is real true. He also loved to stay in bounds & come up short of scoring to win a game which was cool to see.When his head was in the game he could take over. I think he could have been used better in basic 3rd down situations. Mcvay could have done a better job at that. Cooks was good with the Jet sweeps.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
17,508
Name
Jemma
Counterpoint to the enemy propaganda: You guys are paying Jimmy Garrapolo to be your starting QB.

Touche'

The thread winner goes to the counterpoint. The Whiners fans can go fuck themselves with their original nonsensical point.
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
10,875
Name
Scott
This move helps The Rams moving forward. This draft has some nice talent.
I wonder if that Wisconsin LBer falls to The Rams ? I keep looking back at The Rams 2017 draft. A RB is of need instead of a TE. Kittle was a steal for the 9ers, but I could see a trade back. Still think a WR can be had in late 3rd. Like Kupp & Reynolds were.
We now have 3 picks in the top 100.
We should be able to grab some solid prospects on Oline, Wr, lb or even rb
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
10,875
Name
Scott
That is real true. He also loved to stay in bounds & come up short of scoring to win a game which was cool to see.When his head was in the game he could take over. I think he could have been used better in basic 3rd down situations. Mcvay could have done a better job at that. Cooks was good with the Jet sweeps.
I don't know what was going on with Gurley, but he had some issues with drops in the passing game last season.
Up until the Super Bowl, he was steller in the passing game.
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,608
After the Cooks trade, I jumped into evaluating the second round WRs. I hadn't spent much time on them before because we weren't going to take a WR there. Now, it's possible we do. There are four names who stood out to me as guys I'd consider taking:
Tee Higgins
Denzel Mims
K.J. Hamler
Laviska Shenault
I realize you just threw some names up there but those guys are all over the map in their strengths and I expect the Rams to be very selective in bringing in the next wideout with an eye towards "making the offense great again."

The Rams do have the opportunity here to take a guy who needs a little work on the technical aspect of the position, i.e. route running, and prioritize explosiveness a bit thanks to JRey being on the roster and in a contract year where he should play well.

But... I still think McVay is going to target a route runner. If I had to guess what his directive to the scouts looks like...

1. Route running. Not a surprise of course by any stretch. But you don't want to get some dude who is so used to beating DBs with his athletic ability that he's going to take 3 years to get the route tree and even then can't sell every direction off the top of the stem. I am certain this is going to remain a priority.

2. Intelligence. McVay is a windfall for wideout types and QBs with his creative scheming and marrying run/pass but on the wideout side I think there's room to improve our offense with more optioned routes and adjustments as Goff keeps growing, which are going to require smart players. Kupp & Woody both are fantastic fits for this, Cooks was smart too in this offense. I think it's critical to the staff that whichever wideout they take impresses in interview.

3. Explosiveness. Wanted to put hands & catch radius here but as I look at what this WR corps actually needs it is not good hands. It's explosiveness. That's not to say I think they take a guy who has bad hands. They wouldn't of course. But I think they are looking for a field stretcher as part of that priority list.

So my question for you here is if you were to prioritize the three things above in every round (let's say McVay gave you those 3 things as the priority) how does that affect your list. I've been stacking things and gettin my film on since that trade but definitely curious to see your and the rest of the board's take on that. (y)
 

Liberator

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
1,375

The below is from enemy territory propaganda machine read @ own risk!:censored:

Which is going to make it even more embarrassing when we sweep them this season
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,837
I realize you just threw some names up there but those guys are all over the map in their strengths and I expect the Rams to be very selective in bringing in the next wideout with an eye towards "making the offense great again."

The Rams do have the opportunity here to take a guy who needs a little work on the technical aspect of the position, i.e. route running, and prioritize explosiveness a bit thanks to JRey being on the roster and in a contract year where he should play well.

But... I still think McVay is going to target a route runner. If I had to guess what his directive to the scouts looks like...

1. Route running. Not a surprise of course by any stretch. But you don't want to get some dude who is so used to beating DBs with his athletic ability that he's going to take 3 years to get the route tree and even then can't sell every direction off the top of the stem. I am certain this is going to remain a priority.

2. Intelligence. McVay is a windfall for wideout types and QBs with his creative scheming and marrying run/pass but on the wideout side I think there's room to improve our offense with more optioned routes and adjustments as Goff keeps growing, which are going to require smart players. Kupp & Woody both are fantastic fits for this, Cooks was smart too in this offense. I think it's critical to the staff that whichever wideout they take impresses in interview.

3. Explosiveness. Wanted to put hands & catch radius here but as I look at what this WR corps actually needs it is not good hands. It's explosiveness. That's not to say I think they take a guy who has bad hands. They wouldn't of course. But I think they are looking for a field stretcher as part of that priority list.

So my question for you here is if you were to prioritize the three things above in every round (let's say McVay gave you those 3 things as the priority) how does that affect your list. I've been stacking things and gettin my film on since that trade but definitely curious to see your and the rest of the board's take on that. (y)

I didn't just throw names out there. I made a list of all the guys expected to go from the late first to early third, watched them, and narrowed the list to the guys I liked. I didn't consider any guys who couldn't make plays down the field or run the routes asked of the player in Cooks's role (mainly vertical and speed cuts). Taking them one by one:

1. Tee Higgins - Long strider with sneaky vertical speed and contested catch dominance. Needs to improve his releases against press coverage. If he lasts to our first second round pick, we should sprint to the podium. He's a first round talent. I've seen comparisons to A.J. Green. They are justifiable.

2. Denzel Mims - Very physical with great athleticism and a massive catch radius. Has the speed to separate vertically, the quickness and physicality to uncover underneath, and the catch radius to be a red-zone threat. He also needs to improve his releases against press coverage. Unlikely to make our pick. Ultimate upside is Michael Thomas esque. DeVante Parker might be a more realistic expectation.

3. K.J. Hamler - Explosive speed reminiscent of DeSean Jackson. You can't teach his acceleration, explosive cuts, or top-end speed. Needs to polish up his routes, lacks size and play strength, and has average hands. Major vertical threat, can do damage on returns and jet sweeps/reverses, and could play inside or outside. Not going to make many contested catches. Upside seems to be DeSean Jackson, but may end up more like Ted Ginn Jr. with the Saints.

4. Laviska Shenault - Plays the game like Anquan Boldin and Juju. Built like a power HB, runs like a power HB, and uses his size and strength to bully CBs in his routes. Strong hands. Huge YAC threat. Needs to polish his route running (tips route depth based on tempo) and show better effort as a blocker. Has durability questions due to his physicality. Explosive acceleration allows him to separate, but his top-end speed isn't special. Will separate vertically because of his acceleration but fast defenders can recover to contest catches because he lacks the extra gear. Boom/bust prospect with MASSIVE upside.

On the guys I eliminated, Michael Pittman is a contested catch monster and very physical, but I think he's too tightly wound to run our route tree effectively. He's more of a linear athlete. Brandon Aiyuk is talented, but he makes more sense as a Woods replacement and needs a lot of development. Jalen Reagor is lethal with the ball in his hands, but he's small and not fast enough to play the role we want. Chase Claypool is super talented but too raw. I think he makes more sense as a guy who plays as sort of a TE/big slot hybrid. Devin Duvernay seems like a bad fit for our scheme, and his skill-set is kind of one of mismatched parts.
 

RamsFanCK

HAIL ME
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
6,034
I don't know what was going on with Gurley, but he had some issues with drops in the passing game last season.
Up until the Super Bowl, he was steller in the passing game.
Yeah, that was crazy how his hands went from as soft as a fine woman’s tail to bricks over night
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,608
I like creamy thighs. He'll be back one day.

.
Yeah that new avatar has been throwing me lol. Some posters I am so used to seeing the same avatar that when they change it it's like crossing the streams or something. :ROFLMAO:
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
17,508
Name
Jemma
I didn't just throw names out there. I made a list of all the guys expected to go from the late first to early third, watched them, and narrowed the list to the guys I liked. I didn't consider any guys who couldn't make plays down the field or run the routes asked of the player in Cooks's role (mainly vertical and speed cuts). Taking them one by one:

1. Tee Higgins - Long strider with sneaky vertical speed and contested catch dominance. Needs to improve his releases against press coverage. If he lasts to our first second round pick, we should sprint to the podium. He's a first round talent. I've seen comparisons to A.J. Green. They are justifiable.

2. Denzel Mims - Very physical with great athleticism and a massive catch radius. Has the speed to separate vertically, the quickness and physicality to uncover underneath, and the catch radius to be a red-zone threat. He also needs to improve his releases against press coverage. Unlikely to make our pick. Ultimate upside is Michael Thomas esque. DeVante Parker might be a more realistic expectation.

3. K.J. Hamler - Explosive speed reminiscent of DeSean Jackson. You can't teach his acceleration, explosive cuts, or top-end speed. Needs to polish up his routes, lacks size and play strength, and has average hands. Major vertical threat, can do damage on returns and jet sweeps/reverses, and could play inside or outside. Not going to make many contested catches. Upside seems to be DeSean Jackson, but may end up more like Ted Ginn Jr. with the Saints.

4. Laviska Shenault - Plays the game like Anquan Boldin and Juju. Built like a power HB, runs like a power HB, and uses his size and strength to bully CBs in his routes. Strong hands. Huge YAC threat. Needs to polish his route running (tips route depth based on tempo) and show better effort as a blocker. Has durability questions due to his physicality. Explosive acceleration allows him to separate, but his top-end speed isn't special. Will separate vertically because of his acceleration but fast defenders can recover to contest catches because he lacks the extra gear. Boom/bust prospect with MASSIVE upside.

On the guys I eliminated, Michael Pittman is a contested catch monster and very physical, but I think he's too tightly wound to run our route tree effectively. He's more of a linear athlete. Brandon Aiyuk is talented, but he makes more sense as a Woods replacement and needs a lot of development. Jalen Reagor is lethal with the ball in his hands, but he's small and not fast enough to play the role we want. Chase Claypool is super talented but too raw. I think he makes more sense as a guy who plays as sort of a TE/big slot hybrid. Devin Duvernay seems like a bad fit for our scheme, and his skill-set is kind of one of mismatched parts.

I'd add Aiyuk or Claypool to the list. I think Claypool could definitely play at a big slot level or move to the outside and be our contested catch/redzone threat. Aiyuk has speed to burn, and while he's been compared to Woods, I think he's faster and could serve adequately as a deep threat.

And that's not even mentioning Tyler Johnson, who is absolutely my receiver crush. Maybe you trade one of those seconds for a third and a fourth and grab him?
 

Ram Ts

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
2,133
With our 2020 WR depth, Tyler Johnson might be perfect as a guy who can learn for a year before truly being needed in 2021. I just can’t see how any rookie WR gets big playing time with woods, CK, Reynolds and our new found two TE set.
 

SuperMan28

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Messages
2,509
Cap move and combined with a strong draft class. But why now and not before free agency?
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,837
I'd add Aiyuk or Claypool to the list. I think Claypool could definitely play at a big slot level or move to the outside and be our contested catch/redzone threat. Aiyuk has speed to burn, and while he's been compared to Woods, I think he's faster and could serve adequately as a deep threat.

And that's not even mentioning Tyler Johnson, who is absolutely my receiver crush. Maybe you trade one of those seconds for a third and a fourth and grab him?

Johnson is a Woods or Kupp replacement (I love Johnson, but he's not a Cooks replacement). He doesn't have vertical speed. Aiyuk also isn't a burner, needs development with his route running, and doesn't dominate in the air. I don't think he's a bad prospect, but he's not the right fit. Claypool, while super athletic for his size, is more of a TE mismatch than a WR mismatch imo. He's a mechanical mover and doesn't separate easily from DBs.