BRADFORD TRADED FOR FOLES (IN SUPER UPPER-CASE TO DETER DUPLICATE THREADS)

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

TheBunk

Rookie
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
315
Not even sure what to think about this. Good to have the extra space I guess.
 

ZigZagRam

Pro Bowler
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
1,846
I liked Sam a lot, but I also like Foles. If this cap relief allows us to be major players in free agency, I'm a fan.
 

V3

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
3,848
Seems like multiple sources are reporting this. I don't like this trade. I'd rather have an injured Bradford over a healthy Foles
The most underrated ability is availability. Bradford simply can't stay healthy. Just hope Foles can.
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,754
I have two feelings about this.

One - great trade as it frees up space, gets us a draft pick, and we get a less injured QB who has produced more.

Two - if something is too good to be true, it usually is. My guess is we'll look back on this years later and Bradford will have had a better career than Foles.
 

jsimcox

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
1,378
Name
Jamie
If this is true, and I hope it's not, it would be the first time that I have ever truly questioned the Rams current FO.
 

JoeBo21

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
2,547
2622421-7192296625-26224.gif
 

Big Game

Living The Dream
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
1,044
wow i wanted to see Bradford come back and do well but Man you gotta love the trade especially since we get a draft pick as well.
 

Varg6

Starter
Joined
Aug 23, 2014
Messages
926
Name
Jake
Wow. What is the benefit for the Eagles exactly? They, I assume get to eat Bradford's contract, what's the catch?
 

OJM

UDFA
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
42
I love this move. I've said for many months that I felt it was best for the rams and Bradford to part ways. Sam's had too much bad luck here. If I were him, I'd want a change in scenery. They still need to draft a quarterback though.
 

V3

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
3,848
I have two feelings about this.

One - great trade as it frees up space, gets us a draft pick, and we get a less injured QB who has produced more.

Two - if something is too good to be true, it usually is. My guess is we'll look back on this years later and Bradford will have had a better career than Foles.
Nah, I won't be regretting this even if Bradford does well. It's impossible to know if Bradford can stay healthy and I sure as hell don't want to give Bradford a new contract next year. I just will never trust him to stay healthy. Bradford is going to want a big contract if he plays even decent next year. I just can't give him a long term contract. Not anymore.
 

bwdenverram

Legend
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
5,519
Name
BW
Seems like multiple sources are reporting this. I don't like this trade. I'd rather have an injured Bradford over a healthy Foles

I know how you feel man but as much as we want Sam to come back it's a big IF.

Real question is will we get the Foles of 2013? If so I'm on board. If we get the injured 2014 version then it's a bad trade.