With some guys, there comes a point where they're willing to sacrifice some money for winning and legacy purposes. Bobby may or may not be one of those guys. But if he's willing to give us a bit of a discount, we can compensate him plenty well.The we have something they don't cliche is overused imo.
Too many people think this way.
The Rams might be the modern-day popular choice that screams come play for us and our awesome new SoFi stadium, amazing culture and super cool head coach, but the willing to accept less perception is way overstated.
I don't buy into the hype that the Rams current culture and success is as persuasive as a lot of people on this forum think.
Money will always have more power than championship status (I want to win a ring) cliches'.
cliché
NOUN
clichés (plural noun) · cliches (plural noun)
- a phrase or opinion that is overused and betrays a lack of original thought.
The we have something they don't cliche is overused imo.
Too many people think this way.
The Rams might be the modern-day popular choice that screams come play for us and our awesome new SoFi stadium, amazing culture and super cool head coach, but the willing to accept less perception is way overstated.
I don't buy into the hype that the Rams current culture and success is as persuasive as a lot of people on this forum think.
Money will always have more power than championship status (I want to win a ring) cliches'.
cliché
NOUN
clichés (plural noun) · cliches (plural noun)
- a phrase or opinion that is overused and betrays a lack of original thought.
No for sure I agree. Von #1 no doubt. I'm assuming OBJ is already signed based on his twitter posts this week. We'll likely structure an incentive based deal for 1-2 years since he'll miss half of next season. But I bet there is a way to sign all 3 if we really want to. If not then Wagner should become a priority if we lose out on Von. But pass rusher is much more important to our team given we already have Ernest Jones who should be a big playmaker for us next year.Would love to have him on the squad but not at the expense of von Miller or OBJ. Those are more important players to our team. He would have to take a deep discount to play with us a I haven't heard that in the cards for him yet
With some guys, there comes a point where they're willing to sacrifice some money for winning and legacy purposes. Bobby may or may not be one of those guys. But if he's willing to give us a bit of a discount, we can compensate him plenty well.
Sure there are some guys that back up your thinking. The percentage is extremely low and always has been.
Money will persuade the majority of the some guys willing to sacrifice some money for winning and legacy purposes as you stated.
Your argument has little merit and I've been following the NFL for several years.
Winning and Legacy rarely trumps a bigger paycheck in the NFL. Not knocking you, but I've seen enough dollars change a players decision regardless of the winning and legacy intangibles.
Sure there are some guys that back up your thinking. The percentage is extremely low and always has been.
Money will persuade the majority of the some guys willing to sacrifice some money for winning and legacy purposes as you stated.
Your argument has little merit and I've been following the NFL for several years.
Winning and Legacy rarely trumps a bigger paycheck in the NFL. Not knocking you, but I've seen enough dollars change a players decision regardless of the winning and legacy intangibles.
Incentive based contracts from moss and dillon to gronk and brown, have shown that many, if not most players in those circumstances, will take a cut to get that ring. How much is the question. The main reason the percentage may be low is because there just hasnt been a lot of players with those specific circumstances and talent. Many players who may be a year or 2 away from a hall of fame career look at their final contract differently and as many have said, money is not the deciding factor at that point.
Well, I certainly don't know how to "multi reply" on this site!
-Wolf, you just named all Pats. Who are the Ram players who have taken below-market deals to join our culture?
To multi quote, hit the ”+quote" button on a few posts, then hit "insert quotes" button on the reply box. It will prompt you asking if the shown quotes are what you wanted. You just hit yes or whatever and then it dumps them all in there.Incentive based contracts from moss and dillon to gronk and brown, have shown that many, if not most players in those circumstances, will take a cut to get that ring. How much is the question. The main reason the percentage may be low is because there just hasnt been a lot of players with those specific circumstances and talent. Many players who may be a year or 2 away from a hall of fame career look at their final contract differently and as many have said, money is not the deciding factor at that point.
Well, I certainly don't know how to "multi reply" on this site!
-Wolf, you just named all Pats. Who are the Ram players who have taken below-market deals to join our culture?
I doubt we would see Wagner being dragged 5 to 10 yards by DeeboRams brothers, can you imagine Wagner replacing Reeder and somehow the Rams keep Von Miller?
Heck, I think (honestly) the Rams should go "all in" again for 2022 and try to win it all again.
Can you imagine our defense with Wagner instead of Reeder and most of the key pieces returning?
That'd be a dream. Only real question mark would be CB and S.Rams brothers, can you imagine Wagner replacing Reeder and somehow the Rams keep Von Miller?
Heck, I think (honestly) the Rams should go "all in" again for 2022 and try to win it all again.
Can you imagine our defense with Wagner instead of Reeder and most of the key pieces returning?
Not at all. Suh was cut by Miami and had little interest since he had another issue on field in '17. He got paid handsomely for a 1 year prove it deal at 14 mill which was higher than the Franchise tag figure for DT that year. Hasnt sniffed that much $$ sinceSuh came on a one year $10M deal that was considered a discount at the time.
Give that shit a rest, dude. You're not the only person who has followed the NFL for a long time. You can disagree without being condescending.Sure there are some guys that back up your thinking. The percentage is extremely low and always has been.
Money will persuade the majority of the some guys willing to sacrifice some money for winning and legacy purposes as you stated.
Your argument has little merit and I've been following the NFL for several years.
Winning and Legacy rarely trumps a bigger paycheck in the NFL. Not knocking you, but I've seen enough dollars change a players decision regardless of the winning and legacy intangibles.