Black Monday- Coaching Turnover Time

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
So who's going to be looking for a QB next year?

Washington?
Tampa Bay?
NY Jets?
Cincinnati?
Indianapolis?

Can you imagine a creative offensive mind with Daniels?
Daniels who?

QB needy teams now and this year for me are:

Miami
Jets
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Raiders (solve this year)
Eagles maybe?
Vikings likely?
Panthers are probably good?
Atlanta if Penix gets hurt again otherwise good
Cardinals
Hesitate to say Texans but man has Stroud been shit the last year or two

With aging QBs other than Steelers
Rams if Stafford retires.
 
Yeah pretty much half the NFL teams need & want a future QB. Doesn’t mean they will get it. But the need/desire is always there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSchool
I keep seeing this caveat of "if they offer him play calling duties" in the Scheelhaase debate. I've never seen this outside of this thread. Where does it state this? I've seen HCs do both many times. Some times they do the play calling, other times they relinquish the play calling duties to their coordinators, sometimes they split those duties, sometimes they take them over mid-season. I don't recall anything stating that in a job description. Of course I could be wrong - no doubt about that. But can someone show me where that is some kind of rule? I think it's more likely that he couldn't be blocked from interviewing for a coordinator job because he is NOT our OC and interviewing for another OC job would indeed be a promotion. How is play calling duties detailed in a manner that differentiates from one OC to another? Edumacate me.
 
I don't know if it's in the rules or not. May be an unwritten rule. But the Fudgepackers didn't let Fisher have Van Pelt back in the day, they blocked his interview for OC when he was a QB coach. Which I still hate those fucks for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
I don't know if it's in the rules or not. May be an unwritten rule. But the Fudgepackers didn't let Fisher have Van Pelt back in the day, they blocked his interview for OC when he was a QB coach. Which I still hate those fucks for.

This guy?
1770074239956.webp
 
You would think he'd be a good play designer with that cranium size. :laugh3:
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: RamFan503
Daniels who?

QB needy teams now and this year for me are:

Miami
Jets
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Raiders (solve this year)
Eagles maybe?
Vikings likely?
Panthers are probably good?
Atlanta if Penix gets hurt again otherwise good
Cardinals
Hesitate to say Texans but man has Stroud been shit the last year or two

With aging QBs other than Steelers
Rams if Stafford retires.
I meant who will be looking for a head coach nexr year. My bad.
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: OldSchool
I meant who will be looking for a head coach nexr year. My bad.
Well shit.....

Jets
Commodes

Those 2 are the only ones I'd say are really really good chance.

Long shots?
Eagles
Chiefs (only if Big Red retires)
Texans if they regress and Stroud regresses further?
Packers if they don't win the division and go deep in the playoffs
Bengals if they suck again this year


There's my guess :D
 
I keep seeing this caveat of "if they offer him play calling duties" in the Scheelhaase debate. I've never seen this outside of this thread. Where does it state this? I've seen HCs do both many times. Some times they do the play calling, other times they relinquish the play calling duties to their coordinators, sometimes they split those duties, sometimes they take them over mid-season. I don't recall anything stating that in a job description. Of course I could be wrong - no doubt about that. But can someone show me where that is some kind of rule? I think it's more likely that he couldn't be blocked from interviewing for a coordinator job because he is NOT our OC and interviewing for another OC job would indeed be a promotion. How is play calling duties detailed in a manner that differentiates from one OC to another? Edumacate me.
The Rams can’t block Scheelhaase from interviewing for an OC job because it’s a promotion. The Rams can’t just name him as OC. The calling plays sitch would only be an issue if LaFleur offered his OC position with the opportunity to call plays (which is why Matt
LaFleur left the Rams to go to the Titans)
Scheelhaase may not even care about calling plays, it’s just mentioned because he definitely won’t in LA
So it’s not about any rule, it’s just if given a choice he may prefer it
 
The Rams can’t block Scheelhaase from interviewing for an OC job because it’s a promotion.
This is all I was getting at. He is not currently our OC so a job as an OC would be a promotion - thus he could not be stopped on that premise. Others kept saying if he was offered play calling duties, he couldn't be blocked. I couldn't see how that was in play with him. If he actually was our OC, I don't see how saying he'd have play calling duties would prevent us from blocking it. Would an OC maybe prefer to go somewhere he is offered play calling duties? Maybe. Would that be grounds for saying he couldn't be blocked if he's looking at going from OC of team A to OC of team B? I don't know that is the case as seems to be bandied about here by others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
  • Like
Reactions: Merlin
Had to google it out of curiosity. Looks like a 2020 rule change. Also didn't realize that Ratboy blocked two of his assistants. The dick.

Yeah, cant block an assistant from interviewing for a coordinator position. Or anyone who wants to interview for a "promotion"
Its all black and white now, there are 3 designations: HC, coordinator (OC/DC/STC), and everyone else is an "assistant"
 
  • Like
Reactions: den-the-coach