@Memphis Ram Why do you insist on pigeonholing Michael Sam as a purely an LDE? That's just belligerently wrong. It's not even remotely close to a matter of opinion. Michael Sam's a DE just like Ethan Westbrooks is a Defensive Lineman who plays all 4 spots. It'd be just as wrong to call Westbrooks or Sims or Hayes just LDEs or RDEs. Factually wrong. He played from BOTH sides during the preseason and produced from both sides. Had the Rams kept him, he would have filled on both sides because that's the scheme.
Continuing to call him an LDE and then quote his weight is if the two amount to a prima facie case for why teams should be able to dismiss him amounts to nothing more than finding an excuse.
Now, why have I posted so much about Michael Sam? Emphatically at times? Well, I passionately believe in meritocracy and that the best should make it by the fruits of their labor. I do NOT believe that has been the case with Michael Sam. There have been PLENTY of players whom I have rooted for who I have to acknowledge simply have no place in the NFL. Michael Sam is not one of those.
If Michael Sam's orientation never mattered, his draft stock never would have changed after his announcement (it plummeted even though he hadn't played a down or done a single Combine drill) and he would have remained a 3rd to 5th round draft pick with a mediocre Combine and a really solid Pro day and likely would have been a Day Two pick who solidly ended up on some team's roster. Michael Sam is AT LEAST as talented as Cassius Marsh who was drafted by the Seahawks in the 4th round and Michael Sam was MORE productive in the preseason. Cassius Marsh is a DE who is 6'4" 254 for the Seahawks from their site, so the weight is current. Cassius Marsh not only made the 53, but will be part of the regular rotation for the World Champion Seattle Seahawks!!! And as a "born Bruin", I rooted for this kid and know his rep as a head case.
Now, unless you mean to tell me that Cassius Marsh is all of a sudden worlds better than Michael Sam in a few weeks, then all this "tweener" stuff just doesn't pass the smell test. Seattle is looking at having a top 5 defense...again... and Someone NOT AS GOOD as Michael Sam was made part of that rotation. Granted, they want him around 270 or so and want to use him inside a bit, but they've used him at 254. The point is that teams have had choices all along and walked away time and again, even if it meant less production.
I find that... on principle... inexcusable. I refuse to accept excuses for it, however intricately they are contrived or concocted. If Sam couldn't play, I could accept that. That he can play and he's denied the opportunity, that I can't accept.