Arch Manning and Matt Stafford: Rams succession plan

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,656
You have no idea what the negotiations were, but sure how I would assume both sides have no problem with going a year at a time right now. Hell they are essentially doing that with Stafford.
You keep talking in circles.
Exactly, the Rams plan is to look at backup QB on a year to year. They arent committed to Garoppolo long term, if they did, they'd have signed him to loner than a 1 year deal
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
24,029
Name
mojo
More bright side on our Garappolo…he doesn’t have a ton of mileage for a 33 yr old QB.

Paul Rudd Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
8,347
Name
Scott
The Patriot and Niner stink is just way too strong for me to make an unbiased eval of the guy
True, you are biased and it shows. I am not saying he should be the starter next yr if Stafford hangs it up. Just saying I can see it as a definite possibility for him to be the guy for a year or two until they can develop a kid, or find another high value vet castoff.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,656
True, you are biased and it shows. I am not saying he should be the starter next yr if Stafford hangs it up. Just saying I can see it as a definite possibility for him to be the guy for a year or two until they can develop a kid, or find another high value vet castoff.
Glad you do, but the Rams dont.
Otherwise he wouldnt be on a 1 year deal.
My bias has nothing to do with the common sense of the situation that you fail to grasp. If the Rams thought of him in any way as a successor of any type, he wouldnt be on a 1 year deal. You seriously embarrass yourself with the lack of logic here
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
8,347
Name
Scott
Glad you do, but the Rams dont.
Otherwise he wouldnt be on a 1 year deal.
My bias has nothing to do with the common sense of the situation that you fail to grasp. If the Rams thought of him in any way as a successor of any type, he wouldnt be on a 1 year deal. You seriously embarrass yourself with the lack of logic here
There is no reason at this point for either side to go beyond a 1 yr deal....especially Garoppolo if he wants to be a starter. Why lock yourself into 2 yr deal if there is a chance Stafford plays 2 more years? You are placing way too much on the length of the contract. Both parties need to agree.
 

Steve808

Hall of Fame
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
2,069
Name
Steve
Umm… maybe just one against Brady

I don't consider that a choke. The Rams never had the lead in super bowl 53. I consider that a learning experience as McVay was a young head coach and only 38 years old.