I graduated HS in 2001. Became a fan in 2006. And as stated in my previous post, didn’t watch Faulk play. But all that is irrelevant...
What is relevant is what I responded to. Faulk wasn’t way better than Gurley.
Now, if you say that Faulk was better because he sustained it over a long time, then that’s clearly obvious. But for one to say that Faulk is way better than Gurley, that’s where I have an issue.
Marshall was, WAY better than Todd. Not even close man.
Faulk is a top 3 RB all time in my book....even if some people rated him lower, it should be top 5 at worst.
He's one of the best elusive backs of all time. The best receiving back of all time. The best pass protecting back of all time. He's 7th all time in TDs.
Todd is a special player, but think about this: Todd is on pace for 2000 yards and 20 TDs...in an offense where he's the focal point.
Marshall's numbers for his first three years with the Rams:
2429 total yards, 12 TDs
2189 yards, 26 TDs
2147 yards, 21 TDs
And Marshall did this averaging over 5 ypc, playing for an OC that wanted to pass on every play.
Steven Jackson once had this season:
2334 yards, 16 TDs
But he was nowhere near Marshall either. You probably have to have watched Marshall play. He's one of the best football players of all time.