Annual Bad Pre-Training Camp Roster Prediction

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Memphis Ram said:
Not for me as I really believe it depends upon the actual player, his position and his situation with the key being how easy it would be to replace said player (Admittedly that is easier for some organizations than others).

That's why I said that most solid veterans are also JAG.

For example. Ernest Jones was a solid LB. He was easily replaced by JAG Nate Landman.

IMO, it's far more difficult with QBs and far easier with other positions like WRs. Don't get me wrong, talent is important at WR. But a lesser talented WR who is merely on the same page with a good/great QB can still put up numbers do wonders on offense.
Click to expand...
Seems to me that these are two Different Topics.

One is simply player-evaluation-opinions ... which vary. One person may view a player as a Solid Veteran, while someone else may view that same player as a JAG. Just varying opinions that are subject to debate.

The second topic is one of objective classification of the terms Solid Veteran vs. Just-a-Guy.
To describe a player as a Solid Veteran is to state that he is More-than, or Better-than Just-a-Guy.
The terms are simply not synonymous. I just don't see that as debatable.
 
Allen2McVay said:
Seems to me that these are two Different Topics.

One is simply player-evaluation-opinions ... which vary. One person may view a player as a Solid Veteran, while someone else may view that same player as a JAG. Just varying opinions that are subject to debate.

The second topic is one of objective classification of the terms Solid Veteran vs. Just-a-Guy.
To describe a player as a Solid Veteran is to state that he is More-than, or Better-than Just-a-Guy.
The terms are simply not synonymous. I just don't see that as debatable.
Click to expand...
If one were speaking in general I would agree with you. But, I'm not sure anyone was doing that until you jumped in. At least I wasn't.
 
Memphis Ram said:
If one were speaking in general I would agree with you. But, I'm not sure anyone was doing that until you jumped in. At least I wasn't.
Click to expand...
I was focusing on your comment that ...
'most solid veterans are JAGs ... . Sure some may be more experienced, but they are still JAGs.'

I strongly disagree with that statement.


However, I did jump-in to the exchange late ... so, I will now jump-out ...
1779064653747.webp
 
  • HaHa
  • Like
Reactions: den-the-coach and WestCoastRam
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back