- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 25,973
Yeah, I'd be very intrigued with Chase Daniel...but I wouldn't sink any hope into a backup that performs well in a few spot starts. We've seen that go poorly too many times.I'm comfortable saying Chase Daniel probably isn't going to save our season if Sam Bradford gets hurt again.
I'd rather have Colt McCoy.
Yeah, I'd be very intrigued with Chase Daniel...but I wouldn't sink any hope into a backup that performs well in a few spot starts. We've seen that go poorly too many times.
McCoy is intriguing to me...simply because he has much more starting experience and looked quite a bit better his second time around. I don't think I'd sink much hope into him either, but I'd be happy with bringing him in. Is he a free agent?
McCoy would seem to fit what Schottenfisher likes to do. I could easily see them not offering Hill a contract and going after McCoy.Yes, McCoy is a free agent.
I don't think anybody can back Sam and write off a guy like McCoy who was faced with the same issues Sam had when Colt was in Cleveland. I was very impressed with what he did this season. I think he's a very underrated QB and still think he has a chance to start for somebody.
Because there are no other practical options.I dont understand how by comparison Sam is the "best option" when his inability to stay on the field is the main reason the Rams need to look elsewhere
It would depend on money to me. I don't see McCoy as an improvement. He is younger by a large margin which would be good.McCoy would seem to fit what Schottenfisher likes to do. I could easily see them not offering Hill a contract and going after McCoy.
Chase is signed until 16If I'm throwing $$$ around, I don't do it on OL. I draft OL and throw the $$$ on someone like Chase Daniel as a backup QB. Someone who can throw and is mobile to survive behind this OL. I draft OL heavily then. This OL is quite embarrassing. Just saying.
Even if Sam comes back I wouldn't call him long term or franchise. I would still draft Qb in first 3 roundsBecause there are no other practical options.
If the team is interested in winning soon. The Rams have the D and special teams, the O line we will have to see about, but, one can see a plan to fix that. A different starting QB who is a long term answer/franchise guy?? I don't see an option.
What makes Sam a practical option if the liklihood of him getting injured is very high?Because there are no other practical options.
If the team is interested in winning soon. The Rams have the D and special teams, the O line we will have to see about, but, one can see a plan to fix that. A different starting QB who is a long term answer/franchise guy?? I don't see an option.
I dont disagree with this. It would not be my top priority (as I don't like any of the top rated QBs in this draft so far) but I would be happy getting a guy in the 3rd round.Even if Sam comes back I wouldn't call him long term or franchise. I would still draft Qb in first 3 rounds
They are seperate issues I agree.What makes Sam a practical option if the liklihood of him getting injured is very high?
My point is that I dont see where the talent level available has anything to do with Sam's injury potential. Seems like a "walk to school or take your lunch" kind of deal