- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 39,678
Demoff said that they don't see eye to eye on how much Donald should be paid.
Last edited:
Demoff said that they don't see eye to eye on how much Donald should be paid.
Donald talk starts at 13:50
Demoff said that they don't see eye to eye on how much Donald should be paid. Still trying to find a solution. Said that they want to preserve their young talent, mentioned Peters and Goff, that they want to build for the long term instead of the short term.
Doesn't sound too promising. I REALLY hope they find that solution.
Demoff said that they don't see eye to eye on how much Donald should be paid.
I'm already coming to terms with the idea of AD being traded for a king's Ransom . And honestly, the idea of keeping our offensive line and defense in tact as opposed to losing guys to pay Donald isn't that unappealingListening to Demoff - sounds to me like we are looking at an extended holdout. Deadlines spur action - I wouldn’t count on seeing AD’s deal done in August. I hope the Rams don’t blink - but I do hope they come away with a done deal eventually. If AD misses a few in order for the Rams to be able to extend the core talent, then so be it.
Can anyone provide me with some examples of a team or teams under the current CBA that have been crippled by handing out too many fat contracts? Crippled as in having to let elite players walk in FA or get traded away for peanuts because they couldn't make it work?
Reasons for optimism: Demoff says that the reports of “posturing” in the media are inaccurate. (My interpretation: reports of France being “insulted” are overblown). Demoff says negotiations are polite and professional, and that he enjoys working with them. Shockingly, at one point Demoff even defends A.D.’s agents, explaining that he does not think they are wrong in any way— they just have a different opinion about the numbers.
I'm already coming to terms with the idea of AD being traded for a king's Ransom . And honestly, the idea of keeping our offensive line and defense in tact as opposed to losing guys to pay Donald isn't that unappealing
Pretty clear here that nothing will get done til that Aug 7 date.
I've avoided jumping to any conclusions until I heard something straight from the horses mouth.
While this information isn't new, it certainly doesn't present a picture of harmonious negotiations.
Maybe Demoff is tired of being asked the question, maybe he's annoyed with the situation, I don't know. But he does seem agitated.
At least they are still talking
Saying that they don't agree on what he should be paid is not harmonious. I've always felt the public opinion intimated that they were close (Snead and McVay comments), this sounds entirely differentI'd say its pretty harmonious - but it is a negotiation - of course they don't agree otherwise a deal would be done. He was very complimentary (they have been all along) - he was just stating the obvious. They want AD, they love AD, they understand AD's position, but they have an obligation under the cap. I would suspect that nothing said in this interview was news to AD's team.