5th Rd / Pick #172 - Chris Paul Jr, LB, Ole Miss

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
6,450
This draft looks really strong overall with only one potential complaint, that being no CB. Rams obviously like their boys back there.
Think that's a huge mistake unless they actually trade for Ramsey, uncover some hidden UDFA gems, or if we have a surprise current player that improves by leaps and bounds. At least one player there would have been nice.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,382
Yeah I really liked this dude's games. Wanted Nick Martin but have to admit that Chris Paul is a better prospect, better drops and a bit stronger in his tackling.

This is a really good player for round 5 man. Figured he was gonna go round 3-4.
 

AZRams

What, we're all thinking it...
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Messages
3,838

Did he really pull an RB down with one hand with a blocker still on him?!

HOLY SCHNIKEES

Keanu Reeves Reaction GIF
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,382
What about OLT2?

BC
I suppose best way to summarize that is you can't solve everything in one draft. Every team has those areas of weakness. Ours is gonna be that Jackson has to stay healthy or we fucked.
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,717
Name
Desmal M
This draft looks really strong overall with only one potential complaint, that being no CB. Rams obviously like their boys back there.
I didn't expect much at CB. Where I'm concerned is the lack of OT. I don't know what the plan is for OT3. Really felt we needed to upgrade.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
43,328
I suppose best way to summarize that is you can't solve everything in one draft. Every team has those areas of weakness. Ours is gonna be that Jackson has to stay healthy or we fucked.
Still a couple vet free agents out there that wouldn't be bad as 1 or 2 year rental swing tackles. Also a couple draft picks who could be interesting.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,382
Still a couple vet free agents out there that wouldn't be bad as 1 or 2 year rental swing tackles. Also a couple draft picks who could be interesting.
Yeah I'd be calling Smith's agents.
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
5,618
Think that's a huge mistake unless they actually trade for Ramsey, uncover some hidden UDFA gems, or if we have a surprise current player that improves by leaps and bounds. At least one player there would have been nice.
Former 1st round pick Forbes. He puts it together then season (I hope).
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
8,193
Name
Scott
I suppose best way to summarize that is you can't solve everything in one draft. Every team has those areas of weakness. Ours is gonna be that Jackson has to stay healthy or we fucked.
True, but I can say if Jordan Mailata goes down or Lane Johnson, and the Eagles will have issues. Hurts us more with an inmobile QB, but not many teams can lose a LT and survive.
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,698
Former 1st round pick Forbes. He puts it together then season (I hope).
The Horns have to first feed Forbes intravenously until he actually looks like a primetime NFL starting CB. Scarecrows won't get the job done against some of the beefy WRs, TEs, & RBs he will face.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,382
True, but I can say if Jordan Mailata goes down or Lane Johnson, and the Eagles will have issues. Hurts us more with an inmobile QB, but not many teams can lose a LT and survive.
Agreed. But until you're out of cap space trying to get that roster as good as possible is the goal. So it's a fair point that swing OT is a potential target for us.