- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 25,109
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b6ad/3b6adb3c89a53aa4873b721210c18b1cb5100ffa" alt="Mood: Skow"
A bit high, but Everett should have had that one.
But we are playing some starters, as I saw Barwin and Quinn in at the game..both of which who are older and probably more prone to injury..expendable I guess. As for football being a dangerous game, I remember Carson Palmer getting injured in a game, blowing out a knee after having not being hit; That injury could have happened walking around his house.Or logical. Football is a dangerous game with physical consequences. Walking around your house usually isn't. Ask the Raiders if they would rest Carr in that game last year if they knew the outcome ahead of time.
Playing starters in a meaningless game is stupid. Just treat it like the bye week the top two seeds get.
No, he shouldn't have had. It was a bad throw to a wide open TE.
TA is gone. Dude sucks more than dyson vacuum cleaners!
If Goff was there, we're in the redzone after Everett is tackled.
My new years resolution is not to dwell in the past after tonight that man is nothing.Thank Fisher for leaving the roster in such good shape!
What an asinine argument. So what your trying to convey is that it's just as Likley to get hurt walking in their house as playing full contact football ok keep telling yourself that. I get it you don't like it just leave it a at that and quit making yourself look foolishAnd I can't say they won't get injured walking around their house, nor can you. These are professionals that play every week and if they played as if the game decided everything, I doubt there would be any serious injuries...Thinking otherwise is magical thinking.
Hating the 49ers is never stupid.