Stock market made me feel better today.
That’s exactly why the world leans on the healthcare of the USA. The free market here develops medicine more than anywhere else.
its Just another hoax.
hollar when a large percent of healthy people start dropping dead.
it’s mostly hitting those with compromised immune systems.
Uh...which first world nations AREN'T involved, exactly?
That’s exactly why the world leans on the healthcare of the USA. The free market here develops medicine more than anywhere else.
its Just another hoax.
hollar when a large percent of healthy people start dropping dead.
it’s mostly hitting those with compromised immune systems.
Wow!
Did you really just post that.
A fucking Hoax.
I suggest you get your info from more reliable sources.
More than the flu.
(12k - 61k deaths annually)
3,000 is a lot less than 12-61,000. That’s also largely based on data from China and their initial response to it was horrid. But let me get to my point using influenza as the example. In the early 19th century, when it was first discovered that influenza was a *thing*, (then, the Spanish flu) it killed millions globally. Now it continues to kill tens of thousands annually. Scientists - in this age - have already replicated this virus making identification and treatment possible. Unfortunately, it may kill many thousands more in impoverished Countries, and the already vulnerable (compromised immune systems) will likely fall victim around the world as well. BUT. Are we, globally, equipped to face this new iteration of influenza? The answer is yes. Even in the infancy of this outbreak, Scientists took all of a couple of months to identify it, replicate it, and develop a treatment plan.Well, using your figures, we may already be there.
What's it been, 3 or 4 months since this has gone public ? Over 3000 reported dead now with several Chinese border countries not reporting.
And of course, you have to compare apples to apples. 3000 is a global number, 12k-61k is a US number. The global number to compare is 600k. So 3000 in 3 months vs 600,000 in 12. And then you have to realize the 3000 is really a subset of the 600,000. (Flu related deaths)3,000 is a lot less than 12-61,000. That’s also largely based on data from China and their initial response to it was horrid. But let me get to my point using influenza as the example. In the early 19th century, when it was first discovered that influenza was a *thing*, (then, the Spanish flu) it killed millions globally. Now it continues to kill tens of thousands annually. Scientists - in this age - have already replicated this virus making identification and treatment possible. Unfortunately, it may kill many thousands more in impoverished Countries, and the already vulnerable (compromised immune systems) will likely fall victim around the world as well. BUT. Are we, globally, equipped to face this new iteration of influenza? The answer is yes. Even in the infancy of this outbreak, Scientists took all of a couple of months to identify it, replicate it, and develop a treatment plan.
We have infectious disease centers and Scientists adept in genomics, microbiology, and immunology working around the clock to develop ways to keep it from replicating. Yet the media will only tell us that people are dying from it. Well no shit. That's what viruses do. That's what the flu does. There are already 14,000+ *flu* deaths in the U.S. this flu season alone. That aside, how about a little air time for Andrzej Joachimiak or Karla Satchell and the work they're doing to help put a lid on this thing? Nah. That doesn't sell. Order and calm don't sell clicks and they don't pump up the value of advertisement. And that's the reason I pay zero attention to what the media is trying to sell me - on ALL fronts. That's also why I may seem unfazed by the panic surrounding this latest "existential threat to humanity" - in an endless stream of existential threats. Largest market point loss, followed by the largest recorded gain, tells me people are way too reactionary, and that’s fueled by the media.
That ^^. If is bleeds it leads and in this new 24/7/365 "news" and social media onslaught, it's all about the clicks. Responsible journalism and reporting has for the most part been relegated to the back page....3,000 is a lot less than 12-61,000. That’s also largely based on data from China and their initial response to it was horrid. But let me get to my point using influenza as the example. In the early 19th century, when it was first discovered that influenza was a *thing*, (then, the Spanish flu) it killed millions globally. Now it continues to kill tens of thousands annually. Scientists - in this age - have already replicated this virus making identification and treatment possible. Unfortunately, it may kill many thousands more in impoverished Countries, and the already vulnerable (compromised immune systems) will likely fall victim around the world as well. BUT. Are we, globally, equipped to face this new iteration of influenza? The answer is yes. Even in the infancy of this outbreak, Scientists took all of a couple of months to identify it, replicate it, and develop a treatment plan.
We have infectious disease centers and Scientists adept in genomics, microbiology, and immunology working around the clock to develop ways to keep it from replicating. Yet the media will only tell us that people are dying from it. Well no shit. That's what viruses do. That's what the flu does. There are already 14,000+ *flu* deaths in the U.S. this flu season alone. That aside, how about a little air time for Andrzej Joachimiak or Karla Satchell and the work they're doing to help put a lid on this thing? Nah. That doesn't sell. Order and calm don't sell clicks and they don't pump up the value of advertisement. And that's the reason I pay zero attention to what the media is trying to sell me - on ALL fronts. That's also why I may seem unfazed by the panic surrounding this latest "existential threat to humanity" - in an endless stream of existential threats. Largest market point loss, followed by the largest recorded gain, tells me people are way too reactionary, and that’s fueled by the media.
3,000 is a lot less than 12-61,000. That’s also largely based on data from China and their initial response to it was horrid. But let me get to my point using influenza as the example. In the early 19th century, when it was first discovered that influenza was a *thing*, (then, the Spanish flu) it killed millions globally. Now it continues to kill tens of thousands annually.
And of course, you have to compare apples to apples. 3000 is a global number, 12k-61k is a US number. The global number to compare is 600k. So 3000 in 3 months vs 600,000 in 12. And then you have to realize the 3000 is really a subset of the 600,000. (Flu related deaths)
That's a 3% lethality rate Les, and when you consider numbers coming from China it means we don't know how many were infected (probably far more) which would lower that rate considerably.Over 88,000 infected and over 3,000 dead.
No one is arguing about the dangers of influenza, it's been around for a long time and most people now accept its menace. Coronavirus is relatively new, only months old to much of the human population, science still can't provide the answers people seek on preventative care or how soon before a vaccine becomes readily available. While some rail on about media saturation or over-coverage, others believe they are just trying to do their jobs in keeping us informed about a new virus which has killed thousands in a relatively short time span. No one knows the end result of all the speculation, only that it's spreading rapidly and people are dying.
You gave the 12,000 annual as the low number for a willingness to call this thing a pandemic, i'm just saying we have likely reached that figure considering 3000 are already dead in 3-4 months while many countries bordering China like No.Korea, Russia, India & Southeast Asia haven't provided numbers as their societies & media are either far more closed off than our own or that they haven't the resources to test properly. China itself has been accused of sending artificial counts, so without outside sources we have little choice than to accept the figures already given.
If a vaccine is truly 12 to 18 months away, a lot can happen between now and then, expecting people not to show concern over their family's well being seems short sighted. Some may choose to label the run on grocery shelves as a sign of panic, I see it as a natural progression for those wishing to be prepared, ... real panic is when people are so desperate that they resort to violence. I just hope the manufacturers on the supply side can keep up with the demand.