I think they might throw in 93 to move to a few spots to get him.If Love makes it to 13 he will 100% be the BPA. And the Rams will either take him or take a trade down.
I think (sometimes) that the Rams would only move down is if it is a position of need, which it is not.I think they might throw in 93 to move to a few spots to get him.
They did try to move up last year for McMillan and tried to move up the year before for Odunze. So they might move up if they love the player, even if the need isn't immediate.I think (sometimes) that the Rams would only move down is if it is a position of need, which it is not.
In that 6 range I think it was the points line up for them to give up 13 & 29 for it and get back a round 3 pick. Which in this draft isn't too bad.I think they might throw in 93 to move to a few spots to get him.
I 100% believe they would take him.If Love makes it to 13 he will 100% be the BPA. And the Rams will either take him or take a trade down.
I like him more than I liked Gibbs. And I liked Gibbs a lot.I 100% believe they would take him.
Look at what Gurley was in a McVay offense.. Love would be transcendent.
But..... no effing way he lasts that long. Maybe I'm wrong. Gibbs went 12.
For a true gamebreaker, 3 down potential back... I'd do it.
I could see taking Love because he's a gamebreaker, but it wouldn't be related at all to this being a weak class. I'd hope for a 4th for Corum.Tangentially related... if you believe as does Solak and many others that the RB draft class is pretty meh, do you take Love if available and turn Corum for some draft capital. I doubt you'd get a lot but maybe a 5th with possible change. You'd basically being paying two rounds for his services over two years.
Both were receivers. And it can be argued we have a need.They did try to move up last year for McMillan and tried to move up the year before for Odunze. So they might move up if they love the player, even if the need isn't immediate.