I think you meant Watson ... not Johnson.Mu understanding is that the rams run a lot of dime defense, which is 6 defensive backs. So currently it's Mcduffie, Johnson, Lake, Kinchens, Curl and (?) . Is it Forbes currently?
I think you meant Watson ... not Johnson.Mu understanding is that the rams run a lot of dime defense, which is 6 defensive backs. So currently it's Mcduffie, Johnson, Lake, Kinchens, Curl and (?) . Is it Forbes currently?
Yeah good catch. Thank you!I think you meant Watson ... not Johnson.
I think that Forbes could fit in well as a different role player now, instead of being a starter at CB. He had 3 picks last year and was #29 of 144 CB's in the receptions allowed stat line.Mu understanding is that the rams run a lot of dime defense, which is 6 defensive backs. So currently it's Mcduffie, Johnson, Lake, Kinchens, Curl and (?) . Is it Forbes currently?
In addition to the 3 picks, Forbes had 18 passes defensed, which tied for 2nd in the league. We can certainly do a lot worse for a 3rd CB.I think that Forbes could fit in well as a different role player now, instead of being a starter at CB. He had 3 picks last year and was #29 of 144 CB's in the receptions allowed stat line.
Not being paired up against the opposition's top or next best receiver next season should help improve these stats.
Ick on Branch
Los Angeles Rams
Round 1: No. 13 overall: Spencer Fano, OT, Utah
Round 2: No. 61 overall: Zachariah Branch, WR, Georgia
I’ve had some pushback on my "Fano at 13" suggestion, and I get why, to a certain degree. The Rams don’t need to sacrifice everything to come out with a right tackle, and there has been a lot of receiver buzz there lately. But Fano is a quality athlete and blocker who some teams believe can play all five positions -- and the Rams are thin up front. Branch could be a dynamic option if he’s there, especially with Los Angeles losing Tutu Atwell in free agency and lacking big-play options lower on the depth chart.
But like, if we had won the superbowl, no then?They almost have a 100% success rate with those 1st round picks they've traded. I say almost because Cooks could arguably be called a failed trade.
Tano: totally justifiable pick. Athletic, talented and position flexibility makes for great OL selection.
Los Angeles Rams
Round 1: No. 13 overall: Spencer Fano, OT, Utah
Round 2: No. 61 overall: Zachariah Branch, WR, Georgia
I’ve had some pushback on my "Fano at 13" suggestion, and I get why, to a certain degree. The Rams don’t need to sacrifice everything to come out with a right tackle, and there has been a lot of receiver buzz there lately. But Fano is a quality athlete and blocker who some teams believe can play all five positions -- and the Rams are thin up front. Branch could be a dynamic option if he’s there, especially with Los Angeles losing Tutu Atwell in free agency and lacking big-play options lower on the depth chart.
That's why I said an argument can be made either way.But like, if we had won the superbowl, no then?
Los Angeles Rams
Round 1: No. 13 overall: Spencer Fano, OT, Utah
Round 2: No. 61 overall: Zachariah Branch, WR, Georgia
I’ve had some pushback on my "Fano at 13" suggestion, and I get why, to a certain degree. The Rams don’t need to sacrifice everything to come out with a right tackle, and there has been a lot of receiver buzz there lately. But Fano is a quality athlete and blocker who some teams believe can play all five positions -- and the Rams are thin up front. Branch could be a dynamic option if he’s there, especially with Los Angeles losing Tutu Atwell in free agency and lacking big-play options lower on the depth chart.