OFFICIAL 2026 combine

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Sorry, I disagree that's not a great safety room at all (more average imo) and could use an upgrade/competition although you did forget Kichens lol
Until we see an expanded roll we don't really know. Wallace filled in well when Lake went down. He also lined up at safety and nickel
 
IMO, in order for the selection to make the most sense at #13 the Rams would have to use him the same way I envisioned Bowers a few years back.

And that is as a potential Kyle Juszczyk, Sam Laporta, and Debo Samuel rolled into one that leans more towards a positionless football ideology on offense. He'd be a FB, H-Back, Slot, TE, X, Y, Z...12345. depending upon the play.

That would be a matchup nightmare for opposing defenses not only due to the confusion and his physical attributes, but most importantly because he blocks so darn well.

Without that creativity the Rams should probably just pass on him.
Do you consider Sadiq to be as good of a prospect as Brock Bowers?
 
Until we see an expanded roll we don't really know. Wallace filled in well when Lake went down. He also lined up at safety and nickel
Nah we know, the secondary overall needs an overhaul and that includes adding any talent. You mean to tell me if a lets say a safety like Caleb Downs fell, the Rams would be silly to draft him because we need corners? When Lake went down, our defense eroded into a shittier defense. Can't go wrong going after better talent.
 
Do you consider Sadiq to be as good of a prospect as Brock Bowers?
Season 1 Episode 24 GIF by Martin
 
So tell me how he did in the college playoffs against better competition? Not great but hey, he's number 1 lol...... sorry but I believe there's just better players available at 13.
IMO, we shouldn't get too caught up on the specific pick number 13, 29, etc. Snead targets players they like and then moves around for appropriate value.

If they like Sadiq maybe they trade back and take him around 20th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dang
Until we see an expanded roll we don't really know. Wallace filled in well when Lake went down. He also lined up at safety and nickel
Wallace 2025 snaps: 206 slot, 31 free safety.

He probably should be labeled a CB.
 
Feels like we're at a win-win at both 13 and 29. We can trade up a tiny bit if we want someone who might go 8-12 or we can stay put and take the gem who falls. Same with 29.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Badfinger
Nah we know, the secondary overall needs an overhaul and that includes adding any talent. You mean to tell me if a lets say a safety like Caleb Downs fell, the Rams would be silly to draft him because we need corners? When Lake went down, our defense eroded into a shittier defense. Can't go wrong going after better talent.
I mean it depends on where we pick safety really. If we got a good safety in the 2nd id be ok w that. Depends on who falls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Chapo Jr
So tell me how he did in the college playoffs against better competition? Not great but hey, he's number 1 lol...... sorry but I believe there's just better players available at 13.

Weak argument. Puka had 4 catches for 36 yards against ranked teams in college. If you have a coach that can utilize your skill sets appropriately, you perform. McVay would go wild with him on the team.
 
Sorry, I disagree that's not a great safety room at all (more average imo) and could use an upgrade/competition although you did forget Kichens lol
The Rams need an overhaul of the entire DB room. Need some sticky, strong, physical dogs. IMO other than Lake we have 0 that fit that bill. Maybe McCreary can rise to that level with some help but didn’t see that in his limited time last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Chapo Jr
IMO, we shouldn't get too caught up on the specific pick number 13, 29, etc. Snead targets players they like and then moves around for appropriate value.

If they like Sadiq maybe they trade back and take him around 20th.
That I'd get, but not first pick. But maybe that's just me hahaha
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: DzRams
Weak argument. Puka had 4 catches for 36 yards against ranked teams in college. If you have a coach that can utilize your skill sets appropriately, you perform. McVay would go wild with him on the team.
Weak rebuttal, Puka got drafted way late so much so that the Rams brass and fans didn't know he'd be this good. You're not even making an apples to apples comparison but thanks for playing lol.....TEs take time to come along. Ferguson did more than Sadiq and even he couldn't get on the field or have an impact right away. TE is a notoriously hard position to come in and do well right away, but we've been spoiled with some of the college ones recently.
 
I'm no mathematician but...

Let's say we play 13 personnel 50% of the time like we were trending last year and 11 personnel the other 50%. Obviously there would be some 12 personnel sprinkled in but I'm going to try and make this simple.

The average game has a little more than 60 snaps on offense. That means 30 snaps in 13 personnel and 30 snaps in 11 personnel. So 120 snaps total for your TEs.

In theory with the hypothetical 4 TEs we would have, that would mean you could play your star TE Sadiq 45 snaps (75%), Ferguson and Parkinson 30 snaps each (50%), and Davis Allen 15 snaps leftover (25%). If it pans out like that, Sadiq would be well worth the first round investment and Ferguson and Parkinson would still be worth the 2nd round and FA cash investments we've made in those guys, respectively. And of course this is assuming no injuries and we're likely late into year 1 or in year 2 of the Sadiq experiment and he's proven himself capable of handling that much PT.

After crunching those numbers I looked at last year's TE snaps and you had Colby with 54% of the snaps, Davis Allen with 51% of the snaps, an injured Higbee with 32%, and Ferguson with 31%. And that's after playing 13 personnel 30% of the time last year.
I think you may have UNDER-sold yourself sir ...
1772308627642.webp
 
Id rather get dean and not have to give up draft picks and salary vs just salary.
Or Watson, but yes. Rather then giving up a pick we could grab another young defensive contributor. Watson/Dean & EMW/Theineman > McDuffie
Wow... this kid looks like he could be a stud at RB. If he fell to 8 or 9 would you trade both #1 picks to get him?
No way.
 
  • Cheers
  • Like
Reactions: Ram Ts and RamDino
The Rams need an overhaul of the entire DB room. Need some sticky, strong, physical dogs. IMO other than Lake we have 0 that fit that bill. Maybe McCreary can rise to that level with some help but didn’t see that in his limited time last year.
We don't even have McCreary ATM. He's a free agent.
 
Weak rebuttal, Puka got drafted way late so much so that the Rams brass and fans didn't know he'd be this good. You're not even making an apples to apples comparison but thanks for playing lol.....TEs take time to come along. Ferguson did more than Sadiq and even he couldn't get on the field or have an impact right away. TE is a notoriously hard position to come in and do well right away, but we've been spoiled with some of the college ones recently.

But Sean McVay was on record for having Puka targeted because he had a specific plan for him, and look how that turned out.

So exactly as I said before, if a coach can utilize a players skill sets appropriately, they will produce. This comes back to coaching…and we have the best in the biz.