- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 35,325
- Name
- Stu
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecb15/ecb15ae6afdff0466a647e2bbcfa59d84d9d211e" alt="Mood: Youngblood"
You really can't blame him. That organization is such a shit show. Thing is, he'll possibly go to a contender and STILL make bank. It just won't be with us.
He's going to make bank no matter where he ends up. I would never say never on an elite player like him as we have so many unknown things that can happen that it can't be completely ruled out. Yes the chances are slim but with Snead at the helm, its all we need to be caught off guard if he makes a big ass move like that. I'd be stoked but I'm also not holding my breath on it either lolYou really can't blame him. That organization is such a shit show. Thing is, he'll possibly go to a contender and STILL make bank. It just won't be with us.
Interesting, be curious how the Jaguars respond. If this is straight from Jaguars mouth only reason they'd leak this now is to see if other teams would go bigger.
View: https://x.com/RyanBurr/status/1890026847645434086
View: https://x.com/RyanBurr/status/1890032612963762612
Giants as well. If they don't win game early Daboll and the GM will be unemployed by Halloween.If Steelers are being aggressive in upgrading the QB, talks with the Rams have to be a legit conversation
Oh no doubt, I was referring to the Steelers interest in Lawrence. Was speculation but now seems apparent.Giants as well. If they don't win game early Daboll and the GM will be unemployed by Halloween.
Me too, trade our next two firsts and maybe a couple other lower ones then trade Stafford to Steelers or Giants or whoever for a 1st back.If the Jaguars trade Trevor Lawrence, they're very dumb. If they're being dumb, I'd love for us to capitalize on the stupidity.
Yep. If they're willing to deal this year's #1 & #2 for Lawrence, what would they be offering for Stafford?If Steelers are being aggressive in upgrading the QB, talks with the Rams have to be a legit conversation
I imagine quite a bit lessYep. If they're willing to deal this year's #1 & #2 for Lawrence, what would they be offering for Stafford?
Me too. Probably would not include that #2 pick. I suggested a week ago the Steelers might be willing to offer their 1st for Staff.I imagine quite a bit less
IMO I'd be all for the Rams trading a first round pick for the chance to win the Super Bowl now. The Giants would have to recreate 1999 (they won't) for a chance to win in a Super Bowl. The Steelers, hmmm. They have more parts in place.Oh no doubt, I was referring to the Steelers interest in Lawrence. Was speculation but now seems apparent.
Heck if the Rams open conversations with both the Giants and Steelers they could end up in a competitive bid situation
Its not what I want, but if they were to move Stafford I would surely hope for the best deal imaginable
I know there are fans who don't like Lawrence. He is younger than Wilson and more talented than Fields and Wilson. Wilson (IMO) is the Jeff Fisher of QBs now- not the young Seattle QB.Steelers are finally acting with aggression at QB. If they keep this up it will likely pay off for them.
He’s a UFAHeh - would be funny if the Jets traded for Darnold from the Vikings
He’s a UFA
Vikings can’t trade him or Daniel Jones. Neither one is under contract.
We could also throw in Eric Weddle...Yeah but what if the Rams throw-in Joe Noteboom?!?