OFFICIAL 2020 cuts, trades, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
oldnotdead

oldnotdead

Legend
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
5,406
OldSchool said:
Curious but where did the idea we'd switch to a 4-3 come from in this thread?
Click to expand...


In one of the early responses, someone asked if Staley had said if he was going to switch to a 4-3. Actually, both Staley and McVay have said they will remain playing the 3-4 hybrid scheme.
 
dieterbrock

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,705
Just don't understand not franchising either Littleton or Fowler, just for tag and trade purpose
 
Akrasian

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,943
dieterbrock said:
Just don't understand not franchising either Littleton or Fowler, just for tag and trade purpose
Click to expand...

Perhaps they put feelers out, and decided that there weren't really teams willing to give up picks AND to pay those players what they'll get.
 
OldSchool

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
41,502
Yes right free he was hired.
 
OldSchool

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
41,502
OldSchool

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
41,502
LoyalRam said:
who are we gonna get with that 1st round pick for The Archer?!?!
Click to expand...
I know Silver is reporting we’re shopping him but with a dead money total of almost $30 million I can’t see it happening.
 
Ram65

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,848

I did misread the contract details. I did not realize that the roster bonus was guaranteed. Now I understand it has no barring cap-wise when he could be cut because it's already been accounted for. I mentioned the Rams could trade Matthews later on. Even with this new understanding of his contract, I don't see the Rams letting Matthews go if they haven't already.




Matthews did get a higher offer for what it's worth.


Once free agency began, Matthews had his sights set on L.A., even though the Rams weren't offering nearly as much money as he'd hoped to earn on the open market. Though the Ravens offered more, Matthews ultimately favored the Rams' two-year, $9.25 million deal, which includes $5.5 million in guarantees and, with incentives, could be worth as much as $16.75 million. His previous deal with the Packers, which expired after 2018, averaged $13 million a year over five seasons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom