I am grateful for Jourdan and she is the most in depth journalist we Rams fans have enjoyed.
With that said, her long, meandering monologue about the terrible QB plan left me irritated. She acknowledges they drafted Bennett to be their backup but since he's not available, they were somehow supposed to have a crystal ball telling them this would happen. The only thing that makes sense to me is that she knows what happened and can't say but that the Rams should've known better. Otherwise, why criticize the plan?
To me, it was obvious from the Jump that either Stafford stayed healthy and we could sneak into the playoffs or he didn't and the slimmest 2% chance of being the healthiest team in the playoffs would vaporize. This was always a transition season. Rypien knew the system and was an emergency vet hire. But even a healthy Stafford wasn't enough for this team. It's a rebuild, Jourdan. You can't fix every weaknes every year and MOST teams don't have a backup QB that moves the needle in the right direction.
Now, if the criticism is an inability to identify the Brock Purdys of the world, well...welcome to the NFL where everyone struggles to know why CJ Stroud wasn't the first QB chosen. Sean somehow knew Matthew was an upgrade to Goff at that stage of their careers so...he knows something, no? What happens to KC, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Jacksonville, or even Dallas or Philly if their QB gets injured? Oh, Matthew is older and is injury prone. Yes, I understand the argument. What I don't understand is how they were expected to make a significant investment in the expensive QB position when the only affordable path for victory this year was put as many good players around Stafford as possible and hope for the best. Even Sean seems to be saying Wentz isn't a long term plan and we hope he isn't needed.
All processes have flaws, so Jourdan is technically right. I just don't think it deserves that much attention because the big picture is the puzzle they are solving now.