Why Was Langford Cut?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Amitar

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,096
Name
Amitar
Maybe I'm missing something but I do not understand why Langford was cut.
 

Afro Ram

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,005
We had too much depth at the position and they thought he was making to much.
 

Jorgeh0605

You had me at meat tornado.
2023 ROD Fantasy Champion
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,792
Maybe I'm missing something but I do not understand why Langford was cut.
He was being paid starting DT money and was demoted to a backup role on the team. He is also a starting caliber DT on some teams, so the cut was probably mutual (which would be why he got cut before the other decisions were made). He wants a starting position, and that spot isn't open on this team.
 

thirteen28

I like pizza.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
8,336
Name
Erik
Too much in salary for a rotational DT. I'd take him back in a heartbeat at a salary commensurate with his role. But with the emergence of Donald, Langford's role was reduced to a point where it no longer matched his salary.
 

Sum1

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,604
Because he was an expensive backup. If he was still the starter it would have been a different story.
 

Ramsey

Starter
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
Messages
610
Name
Ramsey
It's just business...Nothing personal.
Langford cost too much. He was fat on the lamb...err the Ram.

Most Sack City fans like Langford, but as you know we have a top tier defensive line, with or without Langford... But alas , we have weak offensive line.

You and I both wish we had a plethora of top tier all-pro WR's, TE's, LB's, and defensive backs, but we don't.

Everybody on ROD wishes we had an inexpensive, less injury prone, top 10 quarterback, but we don't!... Instead we got a QB, who has the Ram's front office over the salary barrel...So we must cut solid football players like Langford. I'm sad, your sad, we're all sad that we cut Langford... That's business.
 

rams24/7

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
1,870
Name
Nick
Langford was making too much, but imo its a much bigger crime that Long and Wells are on the roster
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
iopFTh8.jpg
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,923
Fisher, being the loyal guy he is probably wanted to give Kendall the best shot he had at finding another team, and cut him early.


I don't know why Wells and Long were not cut too, but I guess they retire once they are, so no rush till it gets down to the wire.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,657
Fisher, being the loyal guy he is probably wanted to give Kendall the best shot he had at finding another team, and cut him early.


I don't know why Wells and Long were not cut too, but I guess they retire once they are, so no rush till it gets down to the wire.
Sometimes I wonder how old people think Long is, dude's only 29...
 

Debacled

Starter
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
571
Simply paid too much to be a backup. You may see them try to bring him back at lower cost, but he is almost guaranteed to get more money from someone else than what the Rams will offer as non-starting pay
 

CodeMonkey

Possibly the OH but cannot self-identify
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
3,449
Seems such a waste. He was a great unheralded (excepting here if course) team player. So much depth on dline and such a dearth on O. Hopefully we can convert those assets to a high quality guard or center.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,923
Name
Stu
I really think this was a mutual decision. Langford was making too much money for his role here and the best way for him to get on as a starter somewhere was an early cut. He was probably wanting more playing time and with Brockers and Donald ahead of him, that just wasn't going to happen. Hate to see him go but I think most people assumed it was going to happen.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,923
Name
Stu
Cuz this.


What a freaking beast! I had barely even heard of this guy when @jrry32 started talking about him. Of course I dismissed it right away as he was small and we already had some pretty decent DTs. I prove my worth as nothing but a fan on a regular basis.
 

bluecoconuts

Legend
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
13,073
What a freaking beast! I had barely even heard of this guy when @jrry32 started talking about him. Of course I dismissed it right away as he was small and we already had some pretty decent DTs. I prove my worth as nothing but a fan on a regular basis.

Yup, I was way wrong. Its not that I didn't like him, I just didn't think he was worth the pick, I wanted to go Safety instead I believe.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,936
Name
mojo
Hearing on local radio that Darnell Dockett could land in either SF, Seattle or with the Rams. Probably nothing to it but SF makes sense.
Chance to play the Cards twice a year, they run a 3-4 defense.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
11,185
Langford was making too much, but imo its a much bigger crime that Long and Wells are on the roster
Don't even think about cutting Chris Long!