We Need a Different Stat

[Loyal]

Lets get some things clear.

1. I never said Stafford was a reckless Gunslinger. He is a Gunslinger that I freakin' love, but I don't like the adjective. He had a purpose with every decision he made.

2. The stat I proposed in the OP, was a stat called the RFU (Receiver Fuck Up) that puts blame where it belongs, instead of on Matthew..

3. At this point, I think Matthew Freakin Stafford is better than Kurt Warner was and I loved Kurt Warner too.
"Oh no you dint!" ~ @XXXIVwin

 

[Allen2McVay]

Lets get some things clear.

Not Necessary. Your post was straight-forward and clear.

A poster just got confused. He made a good point but made it in the wrong thread.

 

[Londoner]

At this point, I think Matthew Freakin Stafford is better than Kurt Warner was

And you were doing so well…

 

[VegasRam]

I suppose I could have toned it down a bit.
My bad.

And it certainly was not directed at you @Loyal.

 

[NJRamsFan]

I agree with @Allen2McVay …you can’t have one without the other. Removing INTs Bc the reciever dropped it but not counting ones the defender drops? Seems inconsistent.

Also this is WAYYY too subjective to ever be considered. Take the Van play for example, I know everyone is going off of what Sanchez said, but is any of the blame on Stafford? Should he have seen Vans leverage and not thrown it or just say hey he ran a shit route not my fault?

There is no way to objectively enforce fault in football.

 

[Allen2McVay]

I agree with @Allen2McVay …
There is no way to objectively enforce fault.

And I agree with this statement.

That’s why, it’s a good rule-of-thumb, when fault can not be objectively enforced, just blame @Loyal

It’s not always fair but it’s a lot of fun.