Strauss: Rams are taking a chance on receivers/PD

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Strauss: Rams are taking a chance on receivers
• Joe Strauss

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/colu...cle_8f1f00fd-39b4-57eb-abfc-94c29e695d31.html

Jeff Fisher insists the Rams don’t have a gambling problem, but I wonder.

This isn’t the sort of issue that leads to a family intervention, a frantic call to 1-888-GAMBLER or self-exclusion from local casinos. The Rams aren’t risking their rent money. Then again, given the lack of progress regarding a new playing facility, maybe they are. A franchise frequently criticized about its paucity of playmakers on offense has opted to double down on virtually the same group of receivers. What’s next, splitting sixes against an ace?

The Rams last month abstained from selecting Clemson wideout Sammy Watkins with the draft’s No. 2 overall pick.

Actually, the Rams abstained from drafting any receivers with their 12 selections.

This seems a bit odd five months after the Rams ranked 29th in the league in receiving yards, 26th in yards per catch and tied for 20th in receiving touchdowns. Tight end Jared Cook led the roster with 671 receiving yards. The number ranked 59th in the league. Chris Givens failed to catch a touchdown pass.

The Rams, however, insist it isn’t odd in the least.

“I don’t see it as a gamble at all,” Fisher said.

The Rams used a first- and a third-round pick on West Virginia teammates Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey in 2013. They spent second- and fourth-round selections on Brian Quick and Givens in 2012. Including Austin Pettis and tight end Lance Kendricks, the Rams have dedicated six top-100 picks to receivers the last three drafts. (Since Fisher and general manager Les Snead weren’t in Earth City for the crime, we can’t hold them responsible for Mardy Gilyard in 2010.)

The upcoming season will bring one of two verdicts: The Rams are rightly waiting on a gifted young receiving corps to develop, or they’re guilty of compounding reaches in the draft with a stubborn refusal to concede a misstep or two.

The Rams prefer not to describe Givens and Quick as regressing last season. Quarterback Sam Bradford’s shredded left knee sidelined him for the season’s final nine games and resulted in a more pedestrian, ground-and-pound attack. A possession receiver, Pettis seemed to mesh with Bradford late in the 2012 season but caught only 13 balls after Bradford went down in Carolina last October.

The first receiver selected in the ’13 draft, Austin fought the ball early last year.

Bailey will miss the season’s first four games because of a league PED-related suspension.

Signed as a free agent for $35 million ($19 million guaranteed) before last season, Cook amassed 21 percent of his receiving yards in Week 1, then averaged 35.9 yards in eight road games.

Fisher remembers well Austin’s 305-yard November breakout in Indianapolis and weighs the return of Givens and Quick for their third seasons. Bradford’s return is huge. “They’ve obviously shown they can make plays on the field,” Fisher said. “As they get experience, they improve. We still like that position. We don’t necessarily see that as a need position.”

The game slowed for Austin toward the end of last season — a good thing. “It’s all about getting comfortable,” said Austin, taken No. 8 overall in the 2013 draft. “It was a pretty big adjustment for me at first. The playbook was different. The speed of the game was different. I eventually caught on and the game settled down.”

Still, calling it a proven position may be a stretch.

The Rams are still betting on the come. They believe qualities that moved the club to draft each receiver translate at this level. However, there is nuance. Austin, for example, had some trouble adjusting to the football. (The college ball is striped, the NFL ball is not. The difference can make reading depth and rotation more difficult.) Quick remains a practice phenom who has 29 receptions in 31 regular-season games. Givens says he has cleansed his personal life of distractions that weighed on him last season.

“I feel much more comfortable with everything on and off the field,” Givens said late Tuesday afternoon. “I have a different feel and vibe about myself.”

A secondary argument for drafting Watkins or signing a signature pass-catcher was to create greater freedom for the remaining receivers. Fisher believes a robust running game can do much the same.

“A run game is going to make a receiver better,” Fisher said. “You create match-ups and one-on-ones. The defense has to commit to stopping the run. It’s why we have to establish the run game from the beginning of the year.”

Listen to Fisher and you believe the Rams will run the ball as often as they throw it this season. (NFC West rivals Seattle and San Francisco were the only teams to do so in 2013.) The Rams drafted that way, importing earth-mover tackle Greg Robinson and Heisman finalist Tre Mason. The signing of low-cost receiver Kenny Britt represents the only nod to the offensive perimeter. Describing what he will emphasize to his receivers this summer, Fisher noted, “They need to block in the run game. They understand that if we have 12 pass attempts with nine completions and 35 to 40 rushes and we win 13-10 they had a big part of it.”

Regarding Britt, a gifted, physical player involved in numerous off-field scrapes during a five-year career, Fisher said, “We have nothing to lose and everything to gain by giving him an opportunity. He just wants a new opportunity, a new start.”

The Rams managed four of seven wins last season without Bradford. They did so by embracing a no-nonsense offense that nearly made rookie running back Zac Stacy into a 1,000-yard rusher. They were 4-1 without Bradford when allowing 20 points or fewer, 0-4 when surrendering more than 20 points.

Fisher is a defensive-minded coach. He prefers to suffocate an opponent on the ground rather than bedazzle it through the air. He all but ruled out embracing a hurry-up style attack last season even after Bradford looked comfortable working it against Arizona and Atlanta.

Fisher likes his odds better when shortening a game rather than extending it. Not surprisingly, the Rams have devoted significant resources to a dominant defensive front and upgrades on the offensive line.

Apparently, the gamble resides in asking receivers to determine games rather than to help manage them. I wonder.
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
It's a calculated gamble. And I still think that once Watkins and Evans were off the board, what was left was pretty comparable to what we already had.

I do worry about our ability to come back if we get behind, but hopefully the awesome defense should limit those situations. And between Hekker's punting and Austin's returning, I expect our starting field position to be much better than average.

In the long run, I look at like this: Barring miracles, we're not going to the Super Bowl this year anyway. If lack of a #1 WR ends up a glaring problem, then it should be 1st priority next year if anyone good is available. If someone DOES step up though, it should make the rest of the corps a lot better. If, say, BOTH Britt and Quick step up, then Fisher is the biggest supergenius since Wile E. Coyote. Without the masochistic Road Runner hunting.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
Shades of Mel Grey with better moves and hands.


FWIW I think Strauss is a decent writer but I wonder what he thinks our record would have been with Clemens if we hadn't run the ball.
JMO but we are gonna be able to do either style this year throw or run and I'll bet our recs. have more yards this year than Buffalo's,even if the "oft injured" Bradford does get hurt cuz our backup this year can wing it,just sayin' an article that mentions Clemens aught to consider Hill a pretty nice " The signing of low-cost receiver Kenny Britt represents the only nod to the offensive perimeter"
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
We lost our QB, didn't matter much on who was outside. It's a different story is Clemens doesn't take the reigns mid season. I don't see the disconnect with the media besides they simply would rather be blind to how good our team is. Why don't they go pick some flaws on the Seahawks? It's not hard to do with how many players they lost.
 

RamsAndEwe

Rookie
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
421
(The college ball is striped, the NFL ball is not. The difference can make reading depth and rotation more difficult.)

Last year the absence of a striped football killed our young receivers. Now that every wide receiver on the Rams roster has had a year to get used to an un-striped football, I expect huge improvement unilaterally across the board!
 
Last edited:

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
10,845
Name
Charlie
I do agree after Watkins and Evans there was no point in drafting a receiver. There wasn't anyone any different than what we had. And weighing the needs Robinson made more sense than Watkins. Come hell or high water we're going to run ball. That is who we are.
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
I do agree after Watkins and Evans there was no point in drafting a receiver. There wasn't anyone any different than what we had. And weighing the needs Robinson made more sense than Watkins. Come hell or high water we're going to run ball. That is who we are.
I think it was more Robinson being viewed as BPA than need.... but probably it's a little of column A, a little of column B.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933

lockdnram21

Legend
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,348
I think it was more Robinson being viewed as BPA than need.... but probably it's a little of column A, a little of column B.

yea it was said the rams wasnt that high on watkins. they probably would have picked mack before watkins to
 

lockdnram21

Legend
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,348
Makes sense. Austin isn't suited for sitting on slot routes waiting for the ball. Likely to get blown up. Get him in motion on the outside and doing those crossing patterns and he'll eat DBs and LBs up though.

And Moe is very talented in the slot. I really do see him sticking.

i dont see him sticking who are u going to cut? if anything Pettis and Bailey will man the slot
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
Pettis if Britt is the real deal. Pettis becomes even more expendable if the Brian Quick light switch flips.

Britt
Quick
Austin
Bailey
Givens
Moe

I think Moe's a better slot guy than Pettis and will surprise people. And he may play so well they're forced to keep an extra WR.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
6,884
I do agree after Watkins and Evans there was no point in drafting a receiver. There wasn't anyone any different than what we had. And weighing the needs Robinson made more sense than Watkins. Come hell or high water we're going to run ball. That is who we are.

One could argue, what the Rams probably believed, in that there was no point in drafting a WR period. And that the separation between Watkins & Evans vs. the others in this deep draft class wasn't as vast as many of the media and fans made out.
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
Snead & Fisher made the right decision here. Sam has latent young weapons all over his offense. You keep Sam from being molested and secure he will find a target. Snead & fisher have added some good looking receiver Nuggets IMO in Britt, Moe, Spencer, Franklin & Sherman plus a new good soft handed pass catcher TE in Alex Bayer.

I feel real comfortable with our pass catching abilities of our three TE's too, to go along with last years 6 WR's that were on the roster. The youthful RB's Stacy- Mason- Cunningham- Pead could also play heavy in pass catching here from Sam....looks crowded to me. Like I said here keep Sam from being molested & the magic will happen trust me!
 

junkman

Farewell to all!
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
822
Name
junkman
i dont see him sticking who are u going to cut? if anything Pettis and Bailey will man the slot

I like Cook and Pettis in the slot. They're not little slot guys like Wes Welker, but they have hands, size, catch radius.

I think of Bailey as more of an outside guy... though he looks more like a Z (flanked ie can go in motion) than an X (tethered to the line). He was Z-ish (off the line) on that catch against against TruJo in OTAs.

A lot of folks traditionally think of the Xs as being more physical, like Britt or (theoretically) Quick, that they can get off the line even if pressed and tethered by formation to the line pre-snap. In that sense, it feels like the very physical Britt has jumped to the top candidate for the X over Quick. But I imagine when in 11-personnel (1 RB and 1 TE) that the Rams will just put the best receivers on the field. So if we wind up with X-Austin, Y-Cook, Z-Bailey, so be it.

When we're in 11 personnel, I kinda foresee a snap distribution like this:
  • X-Britt (60%), Austin (20%), Quick (20%).
  • Y-Cook (60%), Pettis (30%), Austin (10%, yeah, Austin will show up here sometimes)
  • Z-Austin (30%), Bailey (40%), Givens (30%)
I just don't see Moe making the team, esp if you consider that many of the Y snaps will be going to Cook. I think they gave up on Cook as an inline TE last year (just terrible blocker!), so when he's on the field, it's slot or nothing. Maybe short yardage against a team with small CBs they might sneak him out to X or Z and throw him a slant or fade.

Austin would be the real wild card, showing up everywhere except TE and QB (maybe 5% of RB snaps).

.
 

lockdnram21

Legend
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,348
I like Cook and Pettis in the slot. They're not little slot guys like Wes Welker, but they have hands, size, catch radius.

I think of Bailey as more of an outside guy... though he looks more like a Z (flanked ie can go in motion) than an X (tethered to the line). He was Z-ish (off the line) on that catch against against TruJo in OTAs.

A lot of folks traditionally think of the Xs as being more physical, like Britt or (theoretically) Quick, that they can get off the line even if pressed and tethered by formation to the line pre-snap. In that sense, it feels like the very physical Britt has jumped to the top candidate for the X over Quick. But I imagine when in 11-personnel (1 RB and 1 TE) that the Rams will just put the best receivers on the field. So if we wind up with X-Austin, Y-Cook, Z-Bailey, so be it.

When we're in 11 personnel, I kinda foresee a snap distribution like this:
  • X-Britt (60%), Austin (20%), Quick (20%).
  • Y-Cook (60%), Pettis (30%), Austin (10%, yeah, Austin will show up here sometimes)
  • Z-Austin (30%), Bailey (40%), Givens (30%)
I just don't see Moe making the team, esp if you consider that many of the Y snaps will be going to Cook. I think they gave up on Cook as an inline TE last year (just terrible blocker!), so when he's on the field, it's slot or nothing. Maybe short yardage against a team with small CBs they might sneak him out to X or Z and throw him a slant or fade.

Austin would be the real wild card, showing up everywhere except TE and QB (maybe 5% of RB snaps).

.


I think Quick is going to get more of a opportunity then people think. But other then that i see where your going with this
 

junkman

Farewell to all!
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
822
Name
junkman
I think Quick is going to get more of a opportunity then people think. But other then that i see where your going with this

Yeah, I'm not down on Quick, I'm really not. Guy totally looks the part of an X, and his blocking is outstanding (e.g. on the Tavon Austin catch against Indy). But this is the year for Quick to step it up and consistently make the plays we know he can make. With Britt on the roster and also looking the part, Quick will have to fight for his X snaps.

I'd love nothing more than a Quick breakout year, kinda like it looked like we were going to have with Pettis last year (also his 3rd year). I had to check Pettis stats to make sure my memory on him was accurate... Pettis was training camp MVP, but unremarkable in pre-season. His regular season mirrored Bradford's until Bradford went down, then he really disappeared with Clemens at QB.
 

thirteen28

I like pizza.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
8,341
Name
Erik
I definitely like the idea of putting Tavon on the outside more as Demoff was quoted as stating in the post above, as his short area quickness would make him extremely difficult to press.

As for Quick, if only the light can go on and he can develop a little bit of a nasty streak for contested balls, we would really have something. Here's hoping year 3 is when it happens.
 

Ram Quixote

Knight Errant
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
2,923
Name
Tim
I like Cook and Pettis in the slot. They're not little slot guys like Wes Welker, but they have hands, size, catch radius.

I think of Bailey as more of an outside guy... though he looks more like a Z (flanked ie can go in motion) than an X (tethered to the line). He was Z-ish (off the line) on that catch against against TruJo in OTAs.

A lot of folks traditionally think of the Xs as being more physical, like Britt or (theoretically) Quick, that they can get off the line even if pressed and tethered by formation to the line pre-snap. In that sense, it feels like the very physical Britt has jumped to the top candidate for the X over Quick. But I imagine when in 11-personnel (1 RB and 1 TE) that the Rams will just put the best receivers on the field. So if we wind up with X-Austin, Y-Cook, Z-Bailey, so be it.

When we're in 11 personnel, I kinda foresee a snap distribution like this:
  • X-Britt (60%), Austin (20%), Quick (20%).
  • Y-Cook (60%), Pettis (30%), Austin (10%, yeah, Austin will show up here sometimes)
  • Z-Austin (30%), Bailey (40%), Givens (30%)
I just don't see Moe making the team, esp if you consider that many of the Y snaps will be going to Cook. I think they gave up on Cook as an inline TE last year (just terrible blocker!), so when he's on the field, it's slot or nothing. Maybe short yardage against a team with small CBs they might sneak him out to X or Z and throw him a slant or fade.

Austin would be the real wild card, showing up everywhere except TE and QB (maybe 5% of RB snaps).

.
Except that Bailey will be out the first 4 games. That's the place for competition.
 

lockdnram21

Legend
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,348
Yeah, I'm not down on Quick, I'm really not. Guy totally looks the part of an X, and his blocking is outstanding (e.g. on the Tavon Austin catch against Indy). But this is the year for Quick to step it up and consistently make the plays we know he can make. With Britt on the roster and also looking the part, Quick will have to fight for his X snaps.

I'd love nothing more than a Quick breakout year, kinda like it looked like we were going to have with Pettis last year (also his 3rd year). I had to check Pettis stats to make sure my memory on him was accurate... Pettis was training camp MVP, but unremarkable in pre-season. His regular season mirrored Bradford's until Bradford went down, then he really disappeared with Clemens at QB.

Pettis started to loose snaps before bradford went down. I also think as the season progresses Quick will see more of the field if he gets consistent. The first 4 weeks are going to be huge for Quick while Bailey is out. I also think Austin sees all his snaps as Y/Z. The thing with Pettis is he has such a hard time getting separation he's better in short yardage situation. Imo he's better in the slot. I think Given will see his snaps decrease.