Rams rookie Aaron Donald out to prove he's more than meets the eye/SI.com

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Rams rookie Aaron Donald out to prove he's more than meets the eye
by Joan Niesen

http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/07/31/aaron-donald-rams-rookie-nfl-training-camp

EARTH CITY, Mo.-- Before the NFL draft in early May, Rams defensive line coach Mike Waufle hatched a plan. As St. Louis looked to beef up its already top-level unit, Waufle perused his options. He found himself keeping a close eye on two big defensive tackles, both comparable in stature to 6-foot-5, 320-pound Michael Brockers, the Rams' first-round selection in 2012.

But Waufle has never been a man for whom size is the ultimate prize. When he ran the Raiders’ defensive line from 1998-2003, the coach at times butted heads with Al Davis on that very subject, and he prides himself on winning a Super Bowl in with the Giants in 2007 with a line that weighed in lighter than most people realized. So when tape of one particular defensive tackle came across Waufle’s desk in the spring, he was compelled to give it a second look -- and a third, and a fourth, and a fifth. Suddenly, those two big tackles were far less appealing than this undersized one, who stands just 6 feet tall and weighs in at about 280 pounds.

Waufle still touted the bigger players, though, until the draft got closer. Then, as May 8 approached, he asked Rams general manager Les Snead about calling a staff-wide meeting. Snead granted permission, and Waufle began to prepare his presentation.

“I lured everybody in thinking, okay, which defensive tackle were we going to choose between [those] two,” Waufle said. “And then I said, there’s one player, though, that’s better than these two guys. His name’s Aaron Donald.

“Aaron had some unbelievable tape that I hadn’t seen in 17 years. I’d never seen productive tape like that.”


Waufle’s colleagues agreed. With the 13th pick in the 2014 draft -- the Rams had already selected offensive tackle Greg Robinson second overall -- St. Louis took Donald, the too-short, too-small tackle out of Pittsburgh. It might have been the biggest steal of the first round.

When the Rams reported to camp last week, attention naturally shifted to the team’s defensive line. So what if quarterback Sam Bradford is back from a torn ACL -- if St. Louis wins come fall, it’ll be due in large part to its defense, and as if to drive that point home, Donald strode into camp and left fans on the sidelines drooling.

“When he reported with the rookies, the offensive line couldn’t block him,” Rams coach Jeff Fisher said. “It was consistently, play after play after play … whether it was run or pass, what the protection was.”

Others around the Rams' facility resorted to less nuanced explanations of what they’ve seen. “Oh man,” was all Brockers could muster. “He’s keeping us vets on our toes.” Waufle’s sentiment was just as simple: “He’s showed up,” the coach said, with the self-satisfied smile of a man who fleeced the 14 teams who picked before him.

Waufle got his first inkling of what Donald could accomplish as a pro in February at the combine. Waufle has been running defensive line drills in Indianapolis for years, and when he timed Donald, the rookie’s speed -- an unofficial 4.65 seconds in the 40-yard dash -- stood out. Add that to his low center of gravity, and that adds up to a force at the line of scrimmage, where he can get closer to the ground and up under offensive linemen’s pads.

By conventional NFL wisdom, yes, Donald is small. When his unit takes the field, he’s among the shortest, but only for those few seconds when he trots out in a pack. Then he bends over, the center snaps the ball, and size becomes irrelevant, even if numbers hint otherwise. In the past 20 years, there have been just 33 defensive linemen to play more than one season in the NFL and stand at Donald’s height or shorter. In the past 25 years, only one defensive tackle standing 6-foot or smaller has made a Pro Bowl: Dan Saleaumua, in 1990. And in a league where the girth of linemen is only increasing, Donald’s weight, which hovers around 280, is a good 30 pounds lighter than the average for defensive tackles over the past decade.

The Rams hope, though, that their rookie can be the exception to the rule, and they believe they have good evidence to back that up. Their defensive line has been built with size as only a secondary concern, and it’s managed to be consistently among the NFL’s best since Fisher took over.

“If you can play, you can play,” Donald said. “It don’t matter … It’s a perfect scheme that fits me perfectly, with great coaches.”

Donald’s is the right measure of confidence: enough to know he deserves what he’s earned, but not so much as to seem anything approaching cocky. The 23-year-old is soft-spoken off the field, and when asked what parts of his game he most wants to improve, he can’t pick just one. The whole thing, he says, sincerely enough that it’s believable, and then he shakes his head and laughs, because the playbook is just so freaking big. “You always hear about the playbook, but I’m like, ‘I’m the defensive line, there ain’t going to be that much,’” Donald said, having already shed that bit of overconfidence.

But don’t let his self-deprecation fool you: Donald knows his plays. He’s known them since he showed up for organized team activities in the spring, thanks in part to Waufle’s methods, which the coach sums up with one Ralph Waldo Emerson quote: “To be simple is to be great.”

And maybe that’s the rub with Donald. Maybe it’s too easy to wonder about height and weight even when Donald’s size has yet to be a problem, when that very size couldn't keep him from winning the ACC Defensive Player of the Year, the Outland Trophy and the Bronko Nagurski Trophy in 2013. It’s too easy to overthink, to not just look in awe at that tape that dropped Waufle's jaw.

So when it comes to Aaron Donald, turn off your brain and turn on your eyes, and just watch for a minute.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
17,084
Name
Jemma
I'm guessing that Hageman was one of the two defensive tackles on their board. He certainly fits the mold at 6'6", 311, and the Falcons got a steal when he landed with them in the second round. But I'm more than happy with Donald. He can flat-out play.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
Like Mem, I was on Reshede Hageman, as a trade down option...I never thought donald would be available...I saw a game or 2, but I saw some senior bowl practice tape, and he was giving everybody trouble. I was quick to say he's small but his tape, man I'd take him...So glad we got this guy...
 

rking4441

Rookie
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
342
Name
Richard
Aaron Donald was one of the players, for me, that made the NFL Draft exciting. I remember just counting the players and picks before the Rams second 1st round pick hoping that he would fall to us! I think he will be one of the players to put this defense over the top! Collapsing the pocket so opposing QB have no place to escape. :p
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,766
Memento thinking DT was a huge need:
I'm guessing that Hageman was one of the two defensive tackles on their board. He certainly fits the mold at 6'6", 311, and the Falcons got a steal when he landed with them in the second round. But I'm more than happy with Donald. He can flat-out play.
LACHAMP46 thinking DT was a huge need:
Like Mem, I was on Reshede Hageman, as a trade down option...I never thought donald would be available...I saw a game or 2, but I saw some senior bowl practice tape, and he was giving everybody trouble. I was quick to say he's small but his tape, man I'd take him...So glad we got this guy...
I was excited about the opportunity to draft Donald when he fell to us at #13 because he was obviously a special player but absent something unexpected like that happening I knew we had huge needs at OT, CB and FS. I'm curious as to your reasoning behind actually wanting to draft a player at a position we really didn't need to address. That's not even addressing the fact that Hageman didn't impress at the Senior Bowl or even the combine. You guys see something special in this guy that convinced you he should be a priority over our other obvious needs?
 

rhinobean

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
2,152
Name
Bob
I was excited about the opportunity to draft Donald when he fell to us at #13 because he was obviously a special player but absent something unexpected like that happening I knew we had huge needs at OT, CB and FS. I'm curious as to your reasoning behind actually wanting to draft a player at a position we really didn't need to address. That's not even addressing the fact that Hageman didn't impress at the Senior Bowl or even the combine. You guys see something special in this guy that convinced you he should be a priority over our other obvious needs?
I'm one of those who thought a db was going to be our obvoius pick with the second pick we had. Not unhappy with the pick, though! BPA makes sense to me.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
I'm one of those who thought a db was going to be our obvoius pick with the second pick we had. Not unhappy with the pick, though! BPA makes sense to me.
I think we did OK in the second round anyway and unless I'm wrong I can't imagine a better combo of those picks
 

paceram

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
1,732
Aaron Donald was one of the players, for me, that made the NFL Draft exciting. I remember just counting the players and picks before the Rams second 1st round pick hoping that he would fall to us! I think he will be one of the players to put this defense over the top! Collapsing the pocket so opposing QB have no place to escape. :p

Totally Agree! I did the same thing! I never thought he would make it to the Rams!
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,766
rhinobean liking the Donald:
I'm one of those who thought a db was going to be our obvious pick with the second pick we had. Not unhappy with the pick, though! BPA makes sense to me.
Loved the pick of Donald. I would be crying right now had we picked Hageman though. Maybe there's something I haven't thought of concerning him. I'm very interested to hear what their thoughts on this is.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
I was excited about the opportunity to draft Donald when he fell to us at #13 because he was obviously a special player but absent something unexpected like that happening I knew we had huge needs at OT, CB and FS. I'm curious as to your reasoning behind actually wanting to draft a player at a position we really didn't need to address. That's not even addressing the fact that Hageman didn't impress at the Senior Bowl or even the combine. You guys see something special in this guy that convinced you he should be a priority over our other obvious needs?
IMO our run defense was not where it needed to be, yeah numbers say we're 9th, but the eye test says the Hawks & 9ers ( plus the Minnesota game) ran it up our cornhole, and we knew these teams were running. Also, we have great pressure on the edges, and to really make the pass rush pop, I thought we needed some extra presence up the middle. A rotational player. Definitely not Cujo & Conrath (yes, I'd like to cut him). We needed to make our strength better. It would also help the db's. All by adding a DT in the earlier rounds. I wanted a OT too....but I also wanted a DT....with a trade back...and use the extra pick on a Safety, or corner..or even an OLB....or maybe a OG...just my thoughts...I'm a defensive guy at heart.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
That's not even addressing the fact that Hageman didn't impress at the Senior Bowl or even the combine. You guys see something special in this guy that convinced you he should be a priority over our other obvious needs?
Something about Hageman, while not the motor, or activity you want, I see a kid who plays every down on a weak defense in college. Kinda like that Star kid at Carolina. He has ability, just needs a rotation to get some rest...And he can rush the passer.
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,766
LACHAMP46 thinking about presence up the middle:
IMO our run defense was not where it needed to be, yeah numbers say we're 9th, but the eye test says the Hawks & 9ers ( plus the Minnesota game) ran it up our cornhole, and we knew these teams were running. Also, we have great pressure on the edges, and to really make the pass rush pop, I thought we needed some extra presence up the middle. A rotational player. Definitely not Cujo & Conrath (yes, I'd like to cut him). We needed to make our strength better. It would also help the db's. All by adding a DT in the earlier rounds. I wanted a OT too....but I also wanted a DT....with a trade back...and use the extra pick on a Safety, or corner..or even an OLB....or maybe a OG...just my thoughts...I'm a defensive guy at heart.
A couple of things:

I was, after filling our needs on the O-line, also just interested in beefing up our D.

Also, I had/have the same reservations about what Lankford brings to the table vis-a-vis collapsing the center of their O-line.

Now that we've got the agreements out of the way we can move to things I still don't understand. As you said nothing at all about the player (Hageman), I'm assuming that it wasn't a particular player you were enamored with (I agree that he's probably nothing special). So that leaves me thinking that you think the problem is a major one and that most any highly ranked DT would be an upgrade. Weren't you worried that we might miss out on one of the highly ranked FSs (Pryor & Dix)? Turns out we would have missed out on both of them (like we did when we picked Donald).

Had Donald not been there I wouldn't have minded trading (with my crystal ball) down to #20 for Dix. I think we would have lost a lot of value taking a DT though. The only other DT chosen in the 1st round was Easley who was taken at #29 (he of the two knee surgeries). As it turns out, the only other decent safeties in the draft (Bucannon and Ward who are both SSs) would have been unavailable with what ever extra pick we would have received in the trade.

That's all hindsight thinking though. I'm just surprised that you think drafting a rotational interior pass rusher was such a high priority. For myself, drafting Fuller, Martin or Dix would have been much better value and filled bigger needs.

You got your wish though and with a much, much better player than Hageman. (y)

EDIT: Just saw your last post. Let me read it and I'll edit this one again with my reply.

So I hear you about what you think Hageman would bring to the table. I didn't look at any tape of his play and I understand how he might have been (and probably was) double teamed much of the time due to the weakness of the players around him, but why didn't he show up in the Senior Bowl? I believe that his performance there caused him to drop out of the first round.
 
Last edited:

RamWoodie

Legend
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
5,034
I'm saying it again. Donald was drafted with foresight. This is the guy to replace Langford, next year. Not because Langford is not good...he is...but Donald will grow under him...and next year Langford moves on...because the salary cap...makes you look at such things!
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,766
RamWoodie looking at the situation proactively:
I'm saying it again. Donald was drafted with foresight. This is the guy to replace Langford, next year. Not because Langford is not good...he is...but Donald will grow under him...and next year Langford moves on...because the salary cap...makes you look at such things!
I'm not sure that Langford won't be here next year but we'd better enjoy/take advantage of the wealth we have on the D-line now because I doubt we'll ever have 4 first round picks there again. After the next few years of course. I doubt we'll be able to keep all of them much longer than 3 years or so.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,176
Name
Burger man
Hard to believe, but Langford's contract expires after 2015.

His base is $6 million in 2015, with $1MM of prorated bonus that must be paid, which equals $7MM cap hit. He'll be 29 next season, so plenty of juice left. Cap saving of $6MM if cut next season.

Personally; I think he's a damn good player. He's a tad under appreciated IMO.