- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 33,953
- Name
- Stu
Watching Kirk Cousins and his alleged 6'3" frame and "noodle arm" simply getting it done while the stars Andrew Luck and RGKnee watch from the sidelines....
We all know the saga of RGKnee but Luck wasn't exactly lighting it up while he was playing this season. Hassleback has arguably been better this season than Luck and his 55% completions and near equal TD/INT rate to go with his 2-5 record as a starter.
I am not saying that Cousins is better than Luck. On the contrary. But Cousins was considered a weak armed, fairly accurate QB that could use his feet a bit - a game manager and potential back-up. And he is getting it done in spite of arguably lesser talent than what the Rams have. 69% completions, TD/INT rate of 26/11. This while getting mediocre help from his running game.
Now granted, WA is hardly a great team but that is also hardly because Cousins is not playing well. He started out with pretty bad numbers and has progressed over his time sitting on the bench and playing back-up duty. Now given the keys to the car, he is doing arguably more than merely managing games.
So is it really a fluke that the diminutive Case Keenum has been doing what it takes to win games in this - his first real shot at taking the keys to the car? Or is this his chance to show that he can not only manage a game but play well enough to win games while our future sits on the sidelines as many franchise QBs have in the past?
I know the latest flavors of the year at QB are a huge attraction to some. But there is about as much a possibility that we already have our future at QB as there is that one of the latest first rounders will be that guy.
Do we mortgage our next Aaron Donald, or Todd Gurley, or Robert Quinn, or Orlando Pace, or the next Julio Jones, or pick two of those, on a QB that most have acknowledged are not up to the par of QB classes from years past?
I realize some say we shouldn't go after a stud WR in the first round if we have no one to throw to him. Is that really the best direction? Or is it better to get a QB that can make most of the throws in tune with your offense and give him a stud or two to throw to while our O-line learns and opens holes for our stud RB? While BTW, still having your 1st round picks to restock your shelves when you need a new CB or whatever?
In my mind - the answer is no. But then some look at the QB class as far better than I so...
We all know the saga of RGKnee but Luck wasn't exactly lighting it up while he was playing this season. Hassleback has arguably been better this season than Luck and his 55% completions and near equal TD/INT rate to go with his 2-5 record as a starter.
I am not saying that Cousins is better than Luck. On the contrary. But Cousins was considered a weak armed, fairly accurate QB that could use his feet a bit - a game manager and potential back-up. And he is getting it done in spite of arguably lesser talent than what the Rams have. 69% completions, TD/INT rate of 26/11. This while getting mediocre help from his running game.
Now granted, WA is hardly a great team but that is also hardly because Cousins is not playing well. He started out with pretty bad numbers and has progressed over his time sitting on the bench and playing back-up duty. Now given the keys to the car, he is doing arguably more than merely managing games.
So is it really a fluke that the diminutive Case Keenum has been doing what it takes to win games in this - his first real shot at taking the keys to the car? Or is this his chance to show that he can not only manage a game but play well enough to win games while our future sits on the sidelines as many franchise QBs have in the past?
I know the latest flavors of the year at QB are a huge attraction to some. But there is about as much a possibility that we already have our future at QB as there is that one of the latest first rounders will be that guy.
Do we mortgage our next Aaron Donald, or Todd Gurley, or Robert Quinn, or Orlando Pace, or the next Julio Jones, or pick two of those, on a QB that most have acknowledged are not up to the par of QB classes from years past?
I realize some say we shouldn't go after a stud WR in the first round if we have no one to throw to him. Is that really the best direction? Or is it better to get a QB that can make most of the throws in tune with your offense and give him a stud or two to throw to while our O-line learns and opens holes for our stud RB? While BTW, still having your 1st round picks to restock your shelves when you need a new CB or whatever?
In my mind - the answer is no. But then some look at the QB class as far better than I so...