- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
- Messages
- 1,511
yes please to both Wight and Poole. fyi...looks like we could get Wright for about what we would save by cutting Young.Ok, we always hear about how significant June 2nd is for the salary cap. Does anyone have any thoughts on what the Rams may be doing starting tomorrow?
Do we add Wright or Poole? Does Kenny Young get the boot? Anyone else?
Nothing - all their moves have been made?
He would give them a proven rotational DE behind Lewis.
Goff's Cap hit is all in 2021 according to Sportrac, and Gurley's hit was spread out over 20-21. Not seeing where the 2 deferral rule would have come in to playSince the Rams already have Goff for this year and next year, and Gurley for one more year they can't add another until next year when Gurley will be off the dead cap list. Teams are only allowed two of these types of deferrals per year.
No way would I cut Young to sign Wright. Young played much better in the second half than he was given credit for on this forum. He's a developing player, which is more valuable than a declining player. At the very least the Rams could get a draft comp pick for Young in a few years, if he continues to improve. With Wright there's not much h left to gain. Besides, Shehawk stink won't ever wash off of KJ Wright. :alol:yes please to both Wight and Poole. fyi...looks like we could get Wright for about what we would save by cutting Young.
Perhaps I have selective memory but time and time again I saw soft coverage short middle by the Rams ILBs and a propensity for giving up chunk yardage up the middle once an RB penetrated our DL. I would like our weaknesses to be a focus of improvement thus my call for something added to our ILB corp.No way would I cut Young to sign Wright. Young played much better in the second half than he was given credit for on this forum. He's a developing player, which is more valuable than a declining player. At the very least the Rams could get a draft comp pick for Young in a few years, if he continues to improve. With Wright there's not much h left to gain. Besides, Shehawk stink won't ever wash off of KJ Wright. :alol:
Both edges are probably going to be OLB for a couple of reasons. OLB gets paid less than a DE. But more importantly, and OLB gives them positional flexibility.
Floyd is the JACK which is an OLB that plays much like a DE with his hand in the dirt. Brockers isn't on the team for a variety of reasons one of which is a lack of positional versatility. He simply couldn't play in coverage just like Fowler. You want that versatility because the OL is never sure if both edges are rushing or if one is going to drop out into coverage. Especially on passing downs a hybrid 3-4 is often a 2-5. It's a way for the DC to disguise the coverage.
Last year Ebukam was shifted from his SAM LB position to that DE position. Lewis was drafted IMO to replace Brockers who simply didn't fit the scheme. The way some teams play the hybrid system it can be played with no ILB type of players. The Chargers did it on occasion when they were in San Diego. They ran a 2-5 with no ILB because they intentionally drafted OLBs with speed and coached them up on their coverages. This is why Hollins who came in as an OLB has been talked about being able to play inside and outside.
Centers and QBs call out and point to the MIKE before each snap. Whether the player is or isn't an actual MIKE LB is not relevant. They do it so that the OL now knows where their count starts and they know who to block based upon the blocking call. It also, helps them identify who to watch for blitzes and stunts. Defensively, the MIKE (who is usually the middle LB) generally is the one making the defensive calls. This is why on the breakdowns of Staley's scheme it showed where the MIKE was whether it was Reeder or often times it was Young.
Look at the breakdowns of Staley's scheme and there was often only one ILB, i.e. Reeder or Young because they have the speed to cover. This is why even though they proclaim publicly that Morris is going to stick with Staley's scheme I question it because of how Morris wanted Jones whose weakness is coverage due to his lack of speed. If you are playing a regular 3-4 hybrid scheme you can use an early-down thumper MIKE.
3-4 hybrid is a one-gap scheme, not a two-gap scheme. Therefore the DE is a DE in name only. All DL positions, i.e. DE, NT, DT, JACK are all aligned on the shoulders of the OL. In a regular 3-4, it's a two-gap scheme with the DL lined up on the heads of the OL. They are there to eat up blockers and free up the 3 LBs to flow to the POA to make the play. The hybrid aligns like a standard 4-3 with the JACK LB as the second DE and it's a one-gap penetration scheme. Therefore, just as in a standard 4-3 the DEs are lighter and faster than a standard 3-4.
This is old hat to most but I'm describing it for those who don't know.
In a 3-4 both edges are almost always OLB, because they're lighter, faster, and better at rushing the passer from the outside than a lineman.Both edges are probably going to be OLB for a couple of reasons. OLB gets paid less than a DE. But more importantly, and OLB gives them positional flexibility.
Floyd, Ebukam, Hollins, Fowler, Obo are all OLB. Brockers is a lineman, he's not standing up on the outside, he's hands in the dirt on the inside, Brock isn't asked to drop into coverage. None of those guys are playing the same position as Brockers, even in passing downs, Brock moves to 3T and the OLBS are 7-9T.Floyd is the JACK which is an OLB that plays much like a DE with his hand in the dirt. Brockers isn't on the team for a variety of reasons one of which is a lack of positional versatility. He simply couldn't play in coverage just like Fowler. You want that versatility because the OL is never sure if both edges are rushing or if one is going to drop out into coverage. Especially on passing downs a hybrid 3-4 is often a 2-5. It's a way for the DC to disguise the coverage.
Last year Ebukam was shifted from his SAM LB position to that DE position. Lewis was drafted IMO to replace Brockers who simply didn't fit the scheme. The way some teams play the hybrid system it can be played with no ILB type of players. The Chargers did it on occasion when they were in San Diego. They ran a 2-5 with no ILB because they intentionally drafted OLBs with speed and coached them up on their coverages. This is why Hollins who came in as an OLB has been talked about being able to play inside and outside.
In all but 1 of his games started Reeder played well over 90% of the snaps, he only played 89% in the 1 game. Young is the part time player, except for wk 5 vs WAS and 14 vs NE where he played 70% and 69% of the snaps. Hollins also took snaps at ILB, throw those in with Young's snaps and it looks like there are 2 ILBs on the field a lot more than you think.Centers and QBs call out and point to the MIKE before each snap. Whether the player is or isn't an actual MIKE LB is not relevant. They do it so that the OL now knows where their count starts and they know who to block based upon the blocking call. It also, helps them identify who to watch for blitzes and stunts. Defensively, the MIKE (who is usually the middle LB) generally is the one making the defensive calls. This is why on the breakdowns of Staley's scheme it showed where the MIKE was whether it was Reeder or often times it was Young.
Look at the breakdowns of Staley's scheme and there was often only one ILB, i.e. Reeder or Young because they have the speed to cover. This is why even though they proclaim publicly that Morris is going to stick with Staley's scheme I question it because of how Morris wanted Jones whose weakness is coverage due to his lack of speed. If you are playing a regular 3-4 hybrid scheme you can use an early-down thumper MIKE.
Scheme's change, they're not static. Even Wade was known to mix things up even a little when he was here, but not nearly as much as Staley. Brockers would be and was a DT in a 4-3, not end.3-4 hybrid is a one-gap scheme, not a two-gap scheme. Therefore the DE is a DE in name only. All DL positions, i.e. DE, NT, DT, JACK are all aligned on the shoulders of the OL. In a regular 3-4, it's a two-gap scheme with the DL lined up on the heads of the OL. They are there to eat up blockers and free up the 3 LBs to flow to the POA to make the play. The hybrid aligns like a standard 4-3 with the JACK LB as the second DE and it's a one-gap penetration scheme. Therefore, just as in a standard 4-3 the DEs are lighter and faster than a standard 3-4.
To me it looked like our run stoppage game looked much better in 2020 than it did in 2019.Perhaps I have selective memory but time and time again I saw soft coverage short middle by the Rams ILBs and a propensity for giving up chunk yardage up the middle once an RB penetrated our DL. I would like our weaknesses to be a focus of improvement thus my call for something added to our ILB corp.
Considered far more strong safety than corner while at BYU. Looks like a strong special teams player to me. Not sure why to add another safety to the Rams overflowing safety room. Maybe Nickle Back is a slight possibility with that 4.41-second 40-yard dash?Reported the Rams signed DB Dayan Lake.
If the name sounds familiar, he was with the Rams last year in camp. A post 2020 NFL Draft signing but did not make the final 53 or Practice Squad. Believe he was on the Patriots' PS for a time last season.
I saw him listed as a corner and that's what I was hoping he was.Considered far more strong safety than corner while at BYU. Looks like a strong special teams player to me. Not sure why to add another safety to the Rams overflowing safety room. Maybe Nickle Back is a slight possibility?
Speed? More like a turtle.Look at the breakdowns of Staley's scheme and there was often only one ILB, i.e. Reeder or Young because they have the speed to cover.
To me it looked like our run stoppage game looked much better in 2020 than it did in 2019.